Public policy instruments to promote freight modal shift in Europe: evidence from evaluations

References

• Aperte, X. G., & Baird, A. J. (2013). Motorways of the sea policy in Europe. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2012.705028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askildsen, T. C. (2005). Evaluering av short sea promotion centre Norway (TØI report No. 773/2005). transportøkonomisk institutt. Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, E., Holloway, T., Karambelas, A., Johnston, M., Adams, T., Janssen, M., & Moberg, C. (2014). Emissions and air quality impacts of truck-to-rail freight modal shifts in the Midwestern United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4016102
   Google Scholar
• CE Delft. (2020). Handbook on the external costs of transport: Version 2019–1.1. European Commission. Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, C. (2003). What guides evaluation? A study of how evaluation practice maps onto evaluation theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 2003(97), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.72
   Google Scholar
• Colin, E., Sandström, C., & Wennberg, C. (2021). Utvärderingar av näringspolitik – en intressekonflikt mellan myndigheter, konsultföretag, politik och skattebetalare? Ekonomisk Debatt, 49, 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cooksy, L. J., & Caracelli, V. J. (2005). Quality, context, and Use: Issues in achieving the goals of metaevaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214004273252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabb, A., & Leroy, P. (2012). The handbook of environmental policy evaluation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849773072
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2014). Review of revenue support freight grant schemes (Summary Report IR002 Issue 21). Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Department for transport. (2020). Review of revenue support freight grant schemes (Final report Issue 4). Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011a). Mid-term progress report on the implementation of the NAIADES Action Programme for the promotion of inland waterway transport (Commission staff working document SEC 2011 453 final).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011b). Subject: State aid No SA.32603 – Italy – Subsidy scheme “Ferrobonus” for combined transport (C (2011), 9794 final), Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). SA.33412 (2011/N) – Italy Prolongation of the aid scheme for the development of logistics chains and the upgrading of intermodality (Ecobonus) (C (2012) 5020 final). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Commission staff working document: Ex-post evaluation of Directive 1999/62/EC, as amended, on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014a). State aid No SA.38152 (2014/N) – Italy – Emilia Romagna region – aid in favour of rail freight transport (C(2014) 4025 final). European Commission, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014b). EU competition law: Rules applicable to state aid: Situation as at 15 April 2014. Publications Office, LU.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016a). Refit ex-post evaluation of combined transport Directive 92/106/EEC (Commission staff working document SWD(2016) 141 final).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016b). Mobility and transport - combined transport (website). https://op.europa.eu/webpub/com/refit-scoreboard/en/policy/14/14-1.html Accessed March 23, 2021
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016c). Report on the analysis of the Open public consultation on the Evaluation of Regulation (EU) 913/2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016d). Subject: SA.44627 – Italy – ‘Ferrobonus’ – incentive for rail transport (C(2016) 7676 final).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017a). Better regulation guidelines (commission staff working document SWD (2017) 350), Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017b). State aid SA.48390 – Austria. Prolongation of aid scheme for transport of goods by rail in certain combined transport services for 2018-2022.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Report from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on the mid-term evaluation of the connecting Europe facility (CEF) (COM(2018) 66 final/2). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019a). State Aid SA.54990 (2019/N) – Italy aid in favour of rail freight transport in Emilia-Romagna region. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019b). State Aid SA.55025 – Italy prolongation of rail freight transport scheme 2020-2022.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020a). State Aid SA.54911 (2019/N) – UK Waterborne Freight Grant. European Commission, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020b). Subject: State Aid SA.56718 (2020/N) – Italy incentives for rail transport (C (2020) 2528 final). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020c). Progress report on implementation of the TEN-T network in 2016-2017 (report from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions COM(2020) 433 final).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021a). Mobility and Transport - White paper 2011 (website). https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/european-strategies/white-paper-2011_en Accessed March 2, 2021
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021b). Case search - Competition - European Commission (website). https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm?clear = 1&policy_area_id = 3 Accessed April 28, 2021
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Auditors. (2013). Have the Marco Polo programmes been effective in shifting traffic off the road? (Special Report No 3, 2013.). Publications Office, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Auditors. (2015). Inland waterway transport in Europe: no significant improvements in modal share and navigability conditions since 2001: (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU).
   Google Scholar
• Europe Economics. (2011). Evaluation of the Marco polo programme 2003-2010 final report.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2020). Freight transport statistics - modal split. Eurostat – Statistics Explained (website). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Freight_transport_statistics_-_modal_split#Modal_split_in_the_EU Accessed April 26, 2021
   Google Scholar
• Fontanel, E., Smith, R., Allen, H., Dooms, M., & European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility and Transport. (2017). Interim evaluation of Shift2Rail joint undertaking (2014-2016) interim evaluation report.
   Google Scholar
• Harmelink, M., Nilsson, L., & Harmsen, R. (2008). Theory-based policy evaluation of 20 energy efficiency instruments. Energy Efficiency, 1(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, C., Rayner, T., Jordan, A., Hildingsson, R., Stripple, J., Monni, S., Huitema, D., Massey, E., van Asselt, H., & Berkhout, F. (2010). Navigating the dilemmas of climate policy in Europe: Evidence from policy evaluation studies. Climatic Change, 101(3-4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9682-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., Jordan, A., Massey, E., Rayner, T., van Asselt, H., Haug, C., Hildingsson, R., Monni, S., & Stripple, J. (2011). The evaluation of climate policy: Theory and emerging practice in Europe. Policy Sciences, 44(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9125-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICF, TRT, ISL. (2017). Motorways of the sea: An ex-post evaluation on the development of the concept from 2001 and possible ways forward. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Innovation and networks executive agency (INEA). (2020). Marco Polo II: 2007 2013 : Final report. Publications Office, LU.
   Google Scholar
• Kaack, L. H., Vaishnav, P., Morgan, M. G., Azevedo, I. L., & Rai, S. (2018). Decarbonizing intraregional freight systems with a focus on modal shift. Environmental Research Letters, 13(8), 083001. http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad56c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KombiConsult GmbH, Intermodality Ltd, PLANCO Consulting GmbH, Gruppo CLAS S.p.A. (2015). Analysis of the EU Combined Transport (Contract N° FV355/2012/MOVE/D1/ETU/SI2.659386). European Commission, Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, V., Tocchi, D., Papola, A., Aponte, D., Simonelli, F., & Cascetta, E. (2018). Incentives to freight railway undertakings compensating for infrastructural gaps: Methodology and practical application to Italy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 110, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nealer, R., Matthews, H. S., & Hendrickson, C. (2012). Assessing the energy and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation effectiveness of potential US modal freight policies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(3), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Database on policy for the environment. OECD. (website) https://pinedatabase.oecd.org/Default.aspx?isid = 07ff0e7c-96fe-43f6-8deb-85dfc6f97035 Accessed April 28, 2021
   Google Scholar
• OECD/DAC Network on Development Evaluation. (2019). Better criteria for better evaluation revised evaluation criteria definitions and principles for Use. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pinchasik, D. R., Hovi, I. B., Mjøsund, C. S., Grønland, S. E., Fridell, E., & Jerksjö, M. (2020). Crossing borders and expanding modal shift measures: Effects on mode choice and emissions from freight transport in the nordics. Sustainability, 12(3), 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman, R., Jandová, M., Król, M., Nekrasenko, L., & Paleta, T. (2020). The effectiveness of EC policies to move freight from road to rail: Evidence from CEE grain markets. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAM, S. p. a. (2019). Capitalization and harmonization of the adriatic region gate of Europe - policy framework for the adriatic freight transport sustainability - D 5.1.1 – Analysis of practices to support multimodality (Project number: 10041221). European Regional Development Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. F., Limbourg, S., & Carreira, J. S. (2015). The impact of transport policies on railroad intermodal freight competitiveness – The case of Belgium. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer Davis Gleave. (2011). Mid-term evaluation of the TEN-T Programme (2007-2013) (Final report). European Commission, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez-Alemán, A. (2016). Short sea shipping in today’s Europe: A critical review of maritime transport policy. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 18, 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svindland, M., & Hjelle, H. M. (2019). The comparative CO2 efficiency of short sea container transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 77, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish environmental protection agency. (2012). Styrmedel för att nå miljökvalitetsmålen: en kartläggning. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Styrmedel för att förändra val och beslut som orsakar miljöproblem. Naturvårdsverket. (website) https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Stod-i-miljoarbetet/Vagledningar/Samhallsekonomisk-konsekvensanalys/Hur-losa-miljoproblem/Utforligare-stod/Styrmedel/ Accessed April 7, 2021
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Transport Administration. (2020). Miljökompensation till järnvägsföretag. Uppföljning Enligt 15 § förordning (2018:675) om miljökompensation för godstransporter på järnväg (No. TRV 2020/20665.).
   Google Scholar
• Tsamboulas, D., Chiappetta, A., Moraiti, P., & Karousos, I. (2015). Could subsidies for maritime freight transportation achieve social and environmental benefits? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2479(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.3141/2479-10
   Google Scholar
• Windisch, E., Gibson, G., Loehr, E., Rass-Masson, N., Meura, L., Morel, S., Markowska, A., Pastori, E., & Sitran, A. (2016). Ex-post evaluation of social legislation in road transport and its enforcement (Study Contract no. MOVE/D3/2014-256). European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Woodburn, A. (2007). Evaluation of rail freight facilities grant funding in Britain. Transport Reviews, 27(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640600990418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar