The arrival of Ukrainian refugees as an opportunity to advance migrant integration policy

References

• Act No. 66/2022. n.d. “Act No. 66/2022 Coll., on Measures in the Field of Employment and Social Security in Connection with the Armed Conflict on the Territory of Ukraine Caused by the Invasion of the Russian Federation Troops, as Amended, and Other Related Laws (Lex Ukraine).”
   Google Scholar
• Akar, Sevda, and M. Mustafa Erdoğdu. 2019. “Syrian Refugees in Turkey and Integration Problem Ahead.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 20 (3): 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-0639-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson, Seema, and Oscar Larsson. 2021. “Lives in Limbo: Migrant Integration and Rural Governance in Sweden.” Journal of Rural Studies 82:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaś, Monika. 2021. “Migrant Integration Policy in Sweden After 2015. A Revised Approach in the Shadow of the Migration Crisis.” Fuori Luogo. Rivista Di Sociologia Del Territorio Turismo 9 (1): 69–85. https://doi.org/10.6093/2723-9608/7916.
   Google Scholar
• Borselli, Marco, and Toon Van Meijl. 2021. “Linking Migration Aspirations to Integration Prospects: The Experience of Syrian Refugees in Sweden.” Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (1): 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broschek, Jörg. 2015. “Exploring Authority Migration in Multilevel Architectures: A Historical-Institutionalist Framework.” Comparative European Politics 13 (6): 656–681. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bürgin, Alexander. 2016. “Why the EU Still Matters in Turkish Domestic Politics: Insights from Recent Reforms in Migration Policy.” South European Society and Politics 21 (1): 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1152653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čada, Karel, and Karina Hoření. 2021. “Governing Through Rituals: Regulatory Ritualism in Czech Migration and Integration Policy.” In Migrants, Refugees and Asylum Seekers’ Integration in European Labour Markets, edited by Veronica Federico and Simone Baglioni, 115–134. IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67284-3_6.
   Google Scholar
• Caillault, Clotilde. 2012. “The Implementation of Coherent Migration Management Through IOM Programs in Morocco.” In The New Politics of International Mobility. Migration Management and Its Discontents, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 133–156. Osnabrück: IMIS – Beiträge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlà, Andrea. 2019. “From Security Considerations to De-Securitising the Discourse on ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Minorities.” In Extending Protection to Migrant Populations in Europe: Old and New Minorities, 1st ed., edited by Roberta Medda-Windischer, Caitlin Boulter, and Tove H. Malloy, 1–20. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429490866.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, Stephen, Hein de Haas, and Mark J. Miller. 2014. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. 5th ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Čerychová, Pavla, Simona Kalíková, Eva Valentová, Filip Pospíšil, and Ondřej Valenta. 2020. Analýza Situace v Oblasti Integrace Migrantů s Důrazem Na Její Regionální a Lokální Rovinu. Praha: Sdružení pro integraci a migraci.
   Google Scholar
• Cusumano, Eugenio, and Marianne Riddervold. 2023. “Failing Through: European Migration Governance Across the Central Mediterranean.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 49 (12): 3024–3042. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2193713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czech Statistical Office. 2022. Foreigners in the Czech Republic 2021. Czech Statistical Office. https://www.czso.cz/csu/cizinci/number-of-foreigners-data#rok.
   Google Scholar
• David, Paul A. 2007. “Path Dependence: A Foundational Concept for Historical Social Science.” Cliometrica 1 (2): 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-006-0005-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dražanová, Lenka, and Andrew Geddes. 2023. “Attitudes Towards Ukrainian Refugees and Governmental Responses in 8 European Countries.” In EU Responses to the Large-Scale Refugee Displacement from Ukraine: An Analysis on the Temporary Protection Directive and Its Implications for the Future EU Asylum Policy, edited by Sergio Carrera and Meltem Ineli-Ciger. Florence: European University Institute. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. https://doi.org/10.2870/90812.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund, Helena. 2014. “The Establishment of FRONTEX: A New Institutionalist Approach.” Journal of European Integration 36 (2): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.809345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgi, Fabian, and Susanne Schatral. 2012. “Towards a Critical Theory of Migration Control: The Case of the International Organization for Migration (IOM).” In The New Politics of International Mobility. Migration Management and Its Discontents, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 193–221. Osnabrück: IMIS – Beiträge.
   Google Scholar
• Gheorghiev, Olga. 2023. “Economic Migrants in the Czech Segmented Labour Market: Covid-19 as a Magnifying Glass.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 43 (3/4): 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-06-2022-0162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glorius, Birgit. 2022. “Multilevel Governance of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Germany: A Chronological Analysis of Governance Approaches and Implementation Outcomes.” In Coping with Migrants and Refugees, 1st ed., edited by Tiziana Caponio and Irene Ponzo, 200–218. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003129950-9.
   Google Scholar
• Gorodzeisky, Anastasia. 2023. “Public Opinion Toward Asylum Seekers in Post-Communist Europe: A Comparative Perspective.” Problems of Post-Communism 70 (6): 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1987267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grima, François, Irène Georgescu, and Lionel Prud’Homme. 2020. “How Physicians Cope with Extreme Overwork: An Exploratory Study of French Public-Sector Healthcare Professionals.” Public Management Review 22 (1): 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1638440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gropas, Ruby. 2021. “Migrant Integration and the Role of the EU.” In Migrants, Refugees and Asylum Seekers’ Integration in European Labour Markets, edited by Veronica Federico and Simone Baglioni, 73–93. IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67284-3_4.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, Oliver, and Sieglinde Rosenberger. 2023. “Between Opportunities and Constraints: Right-Wing Populists as Designers of Migrant Integration Policy.” Policy Studies 44 (2): 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2021.2019212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guild, Elspeth, Stefanie Grant, and Kees Groenendijk. 2020. “Unfinished Business: The IOM and Migrants’ Human Rights.” In The International Organization for Migration, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 29–51. International Political Economy Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32976-1_2.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, Seung-Hwan, and Kyung-Eun Yang. 2022. “The Impact of Anti-Discrimination Policies on Immigrant Youths’ Sense of National Belonging: An Institutionalist Account.” Policy Studies 43 (4): 821–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1782869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1951. Hegel’s Science of Logic. 2 vols. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, Vilde. 2018. “Cross-National Convergence in Times of Crisis? Integration Policies Before, During and After the Refugee Crisis.” West European Politics 41 (6): 1305–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1429748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hnilicová, Helena, and Karolína Dobiášová. 2011. “Migrants’ Health and Access to Healthcare in the Czech Republic.” Central European Journal of Public Health 19 (3): 134–138. https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a3657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horáček, Filip. 2023. “Česko Se Otevírá Migrantům. Do Firem Přijdou Tisíce Filipínců i Mongolů.” Seznam.Cz, October 4. https://www.seznamzpravy.cz/clanek/ekonomika-byznys-trendy-analyzy-do-ceskych-firem-prijde-od-ledna-az-40-tisic-cizincu-stacit-to-ale-nebude-237694.
   Google Scholar
• Icoz, Gülay, and Natalie Martin. 2021. “Historical Institutionalism and EU–Turkey Relations: Path Dependence and Critical Junctures in the Accession Process.” In EU-Turkey Relations, edited by Wulf Reiners and Ebru Turhan, 83–106. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70890-0_4.
   Google Scholar
• James, Toby S. 2016. “Neo-Statecraft Theory, Historical Institutionalism and Institutional Change.” Government and Opposition 51 (1): 84–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelínková, Marie. 2019. “A Refugee Crisis Without Refugees: Policy and Media Discourse on Refugees in the Czech Republic and Its Implications.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 13 (1): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2019-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Jelínková, Marie, ed. 2023. Local Migrant Integration Policies and Their Structural Mechanisms. Prague: Karolinum Press. https://doi.org/10.14712/9788024641959.
   Google Scholar
• Jelínková, Marie, Karolína Dobiášová, Jolana Kopsa Těšínová, and Michal Koščík. 2023. “Zkušenosti Lékařů s Interkulturními Rozdíly v Komunikaci s Ukrajinskými Uprchlíky v Době Rusko-Ukrajinského Ozbrojeného Konfliktu” [Experience of doctors with intercultural differences in communication with Ukrainian refugees during the Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict]. Časopis Lékařů Českých / Czech Medical Journal 162: 76–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jelínková, Marie, František Ochrana, and Michal Plaček. 2023. “Příchod Ukrajinských Uprchlíků Perspektivou Obcí v Česku” [Arrival of Ukrainian refugees the perspective of municipalities in the Czech Republic]. Geografie 128 (3): 271–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelínková, Marie, and Blanka Tollarová. 2022. Support for Ukrainian Refugees Remains Makeshift, Strategic Governance Is Failing. Policy Brief. Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University. https://fsv.cuni.cz/sites/default/files/uploads/files/Support%20for%20Ukrainian%20refugees%20remains%20makeshift%2C%20strategic%20governance%20is%20failing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jelínková, Marie, and Ondřej Valenta. 2022. “Migration Integration in the Czech Republic: An Analysis of the Priorities the Country Has Set and Its Support for Them.” Czech Sociological Review 58 (1): 71–98. https://doi.org/10.13060/csr.2022.008.
   Google Scholar
• Jelínková, Marie, Vladislav Valentinov, Michal Plaček, and Gabriela Vaceková. 2023. “Human-Made Disasters in a Decentralized Context: How Czech Municipalities Are Dealing with the Ukrainian Crisis.” Public Money & Management 43 (4): 367–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2154950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konsorcium. 2023. “Vývoj Počtu Osob s Udělenou Dočasnou Ochranou v Souvislosti v Válkou Na Ukrajině v ČR” [Development of the number of persons granted temporary protection in the context of the war in Ukraine in the Czech Republic]. Konsorcium nevládních organizací pracujících s migranty. https://migracnikonsorcium.cz/cs/data-statistiky-a-analyzy/uprchlici-z-ukrajiny-v-datech/#uprchlici-cr-pocty.
   Google Scholar
• Kušniráková, Tereza. 2014. “Is There an Integration Policy Being Formed in Czechia?” Identities 21 (6): 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2013.828617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra. 2002. “EU Enlargement and the Challenge of Policy Transfer: The Case of Refugee Policy.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 28 (4): 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183021000032272.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra. 2016. “Multilevelling EU External Governance: The Role of International Organizations in the Diffusion of EU Migration Policies.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (4): 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1102047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienen, Carmen S., and Emily LeRoux-Rutledge. 2022. “Refugee Identity and Integration in Germany During the European ‘Migration Crisis’: Why Local Community Support Matters, and Why Policy Gets It Wrong.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2022.2098445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukešová, Anna. 2023. “Is Czechia an Immigration Country? Evidence from Civic Integration Policies.” Problemy Polityki Społecznej Studia i Dyskusje 59 (4): 267–287. https://doi.org/10.31971/pps/159026.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Ann Thelen, eds. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maroukis, Thanos. 2013. “Economic Crisis and Migrants’ Employment: A View from Greece in Comparative Perspective.” Policy Studies 34 (2): 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2013.767589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, Patrice C. 2017. The NGO Game: Post-Conflict Peacebuilding in the Balkans and Beyond. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Michael, Clara Moder, Michaela Neumayr, and Peter Vandor. 2020. “Civil Society and Its Institutional Context in CEE.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 31 (4): 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00106-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourad, Lama, and Kelsey P. Norman. 2020. “Transforming Refugees into Migrants: Institutional Change and the Politics of International Protection.” European Journal of International Relations 26 (3): 687–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119883688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochrana, František. 2022. “Historical-Evolutionary and Retrograde Approach to the Study of Social Phenomena and Public Administration.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 15 (2): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2020. OECD Economic Surveys: Czech Republic 2020. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/1b180a5a-en.
   Google Scholar
• PAQ. 2023a. “Integrace Uprchlíků Na Trhu Práce a v Bydlení.” 6. Vlna Výzkumu Hlas Ukrajinců – Červen 2023. PAQ Research. https://www.paqresearch.cz/post/uprchlici-posun-jazyk-prace-bydleni.
   Google Scholar
• PAQ. 2023b. “Ukrainian Refugee Integration: One Year On.” PAQ Research. https://www.paqresearch.cz/post/integrace-ukrajinskych-uprchliku-rok-pote.
   Google Scholar
• PAQ Research & České Priority. 2022. “Bydlení, Trh Práce, Vzdělávání: Jak Postupovat v Integraci Ukrajinských Uprchlíků v ČR 2022” [Integration of Ukrainian refugees in the Czech Republic 2022+/ housing, labour market, education]. https://www.paqresearch.cz/post/integrace-ukrajinskych-uprchl%C3%ADku-v-cr-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pécoud, Antoine. 2018. “What Do We Know About the International Organization for Migration?” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (10): 1621–1638. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1354028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., and G. Fontaine, eds. 2020. Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pettrachin, Andrea. 2023. “The Politics of Multi-Level Migration Policymaking: A Network-Centred Perspective.” Policy Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2187043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaček, M., F. Ochrana, M. Půček, and J. Nemec. 2020. Fiscal Decentralization Reforms. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Plaček, Michal, František Ochrana, Milan Půček, Juraj Nemec, and Milan Křápek. 2018. “Devolution in the Czech and Slovak Institutions of Cultural Heritage.” Museum Management and Curatorship 33 (6): 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1496356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaček, Michal, David Špaček, and František Ochrana. 2020. “Public Leadership and Strategies of Czech Municipalities During the COVID-19 Pandemic – Municipal Activism vs Municipal Passivism.” International Journal of Public Leadership 17 (1): 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-06-2020-0047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaček, Michal, Gabriela Vaceková, Vladislav Valentinov, and František Ochrana. 2022. “Historical Institutionalism: A Tool for Researching the Nonprofit Sector in Times of Pandemic.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2052027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakušan, V. (@Vit_Rakusan, note: Minister of the Interior). 2022. “Neexistuje žádné ‘my, nebo Ukrajinci’ … ” [There is no ‘us or the Ukrainians’ …]. Twitter, March 5, 2022. https://twitter.com/Vit_Rakusan/status/1500147941885030405.
   Google Scholar
• Saxonberg, Steven, Tomáš Sirovátka, and Miroslava Janoušková. 2013. “When Do Policies Become Path Dependent? The Czech Example.” Journal of European Social Policy 23 (4): 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928713507465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, Maria, and Elina Jonitz. 2023. “The Entanglement of Substantive and Symbolic Politics in Immigrant Integration: Insights from a Regional State in Germany.” Policy Studies 44 (4): 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2022.2080813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, Peter W. A., Elizabeth Collett, and Milica Petrovic. 2017. “Mainstreaming Migrant Integration? A Critical Analysis of a New Trend in Integration Governance.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (2): 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315612902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomaker, Rahel M., and Michael W. Bauer. 2020. “What Drives Successful Administrative Performance During Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Public Administration Review 80 (5): 845–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Yu, Hee S. Jang, Laura Keyes, and Lisa Dicke. 2020. “Nonprofit Service Continuity and Responses in the Pandemic: Disruptions, Ambiguity, Innovation, and Challenges.” Public Administration Review 80 (5): 874–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirovátka, Tomáš, Steven Saxonberg, and Eduard Csudai. 2023. “Emergency Welfare States in Action: Social Policy Adaptations to COVID-19 in the Czechia, Hungary and Slovakia.” Social Policy & Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano, Giacomo, and Thomas Huddleston. 2020. “MIPEX2020 (Migrant Integration Policy Index).”
   Google Scholar
• Solano, Giacomo, Samuel D. Schmid, and Marc Helbling. 2023. “Extending Migrants’ Rights but Limiting Long-Term Settlement: Migrant Integration Policy Trends in EU and OECD Countries Between 2010 and 2019.” International Migration Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183231172102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solodoch, Omer. 2021. “Regaining Control? The Political Impact of Policy Responses to Refugee Crises.” International Organization 75 (3): 735–768. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmo, Sven. 2008. “Historical Institutionalism.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences, 1st ed., edited by Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.008.
   Google Scholar
• STEM. 2023. “Czech Society Is Divided on the Topic of Support for Ukrainian Refugees. The Perception of Russia as the Main Culprit of the War Is Not Diminishing.” https://www.stem.cz/ceska-spolecnost-je-rozpolcena-na-tematu-podpory-ukrajinskych-uprchliku-vnimani-ruska-jako-hlavniho-vinika-valky-neklesa/.
   Google Scholar
• Stojanov, Robert, Radka Klvaňová, Aneta Seidlová, and Oldřich Bureš. 2022. “Contemporary Czech Migration Policy: ‘Labour, Not People’?” Population, Space and Place 28 (4): e2533. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, Roy, and Royston Greenwood. 2009. “Methodological Issues in Researching Institutional Change.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, edited by Alan Bryman and David A. Buchanan, 177–195. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sunata, Ulaş, and Salіh Tosun. 2019. “Assessing the Civil Society’s Role in Refugee Integration in Turkey: Ngo-R as a New Typology.” Journal of Refugee Studies 32 (4): 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fey047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titěrová, Kristýna. 2021. “Strategické Cíle pro Jazykovou Přípravu a Rovné Příležitosti pro Roky 2021–2022” [Strategic objectives for language training and equal opportunities for 2021–2022]. Policy Paper. META, o.p.s. https://cloud.meta-ops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/meta_policy-paper_2021-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tkaczyk, Michal. 2017. “Between Politicization and Securitization: Coverage of the European Migration Crisis in Czech Online News Media.” Communication Today; Trnava 8 (2): 90–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wolleghem, Pierre Georges. 2019. “Why Implement Without a Tangible Threat? The Effect of a Soft Instrument on National Migrant Integration Policies.” In The EU’s Policy on the Integration of Migrants, edited by Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem, 133–161. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97682-2_5.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Darrin H. E., Brad A. M. Johnson, Eric Stokan, and Michael Overton. 2020. “Institutional Collective Action During COVID-19: Lessons in Local Economic Development.” Public Administration Review 80 (5): 862–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zardo, Federica, and Chiara Loschi. 2022. “EU-Algeria (Non)Cooperation on Migration: A Tale of Two Fortresses.” Mediterranean Politics 27 (2): 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2020.1758453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelano, Karin. 2018. “Balancing Informality and Need – Policy Responses to Informal East-West Migration in Austria, the Netherlands and Sweden.” Policy Studies 39 (5): 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1487051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zogata-Kusz, Agnieszka. 2020. “Immigration and Integration Policies in Czechia.” In Relations Between Immigration and Integration Policies in Europe, edited by Maciej Duszczyk, Marta Pachocka, and Dominika Pszczółkowska, 173–196. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar