Policy Context for Transitions to Adulthood Experienced by Young People with Complex Support Needs: Australian Federal and State Perspectives

References

• Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care (2019). The Australian health system [Website]. https://www.health.gov.au/about-us/the-australian-health-system
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Social Services (2019). Our responsibilities [Website]. https://www.dss.gov.au/our-responsibilities
   Google Scholar
• Baldry, E., Clarence, M., Dowse, L., & Trollor, J. (2013). Reducing vulnerability to harm in adults with cognitive disabilities in the Australian criminal justice system. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(3), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., Suter, J., Bruns, E., & O’Rourke, K. (2011). Implementation research and wraparound literature: Building a research agenda. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-010-9430-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Ecological systems theory (1992). In U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development (pp. 106–173). Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Burris, S. (2015). Public health law monitoring and evaluation in a big data future. ISJLP, 11, 115.
   Google Scholar
• Cuervo, H., & Wyn, J. (2014). Reflections on the use of spatial and relational metaphors in youth studies. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(7), 901–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.878796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, T. M., Strnadová, I., H. M. Lee, & Lonergan, R. (2022). Education-centred formal wraparound services in support of school-aged students with complex needs: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education (Q1). https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2022.1
   Google Scholar
• Didi, A., Dowse, L., & Smith, L. (2018). Intellectual disability and complex support needs: human rights perspective for policy and practice. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(8), 989–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1485653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowse, L., Cumming, T., Strnadová, I., Lee, J. S., & Trofimovs, J. (2014). Young people with complex needs: Whose responsibility? Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2014.953671
   Google Scholar
• Dowse, L., & Dew, A. (2016). Commentary by Leanne Dowse and Angela Dew on ‘Reducing the inequality of luck: Keynote address at the 2015 Australasian Society for Intellectual Disability National Conference’ (Bonyhady, 2016). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2016.1220262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, P. D., Gothberg, J. E., Fowler, C., & Coyle, J. (2016). Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: A model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs. Western Michigan University. Available at https://doi.org/http://www.transitionta.org
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Berrick, J. D. (2014). Experiences of youth who transition to adulthood out of care: Developing a theoretical framework. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.08.00
   Google Scholar
• Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. C., Strnadová, I., & Cumming, T. M. (2017). Systems barriers to community re-entry for incarcerated youths: A review. Children and Youth Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.025
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Strnadová, I., & Cumming, T. (2016). Lifespan transitions for individuals with disabilities: A holistic perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J., & Sanders, B. (2011). The community supports for wraparound inventory: An assessment of the implementation context for wraparound. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-010-9432-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, D., Brooks, F., Perry, L., Kang, M., & Steinbeck, K. (2021). Australian federal, state and territory policy on the health and wellbeing of young people: A scoping review. Health Policy, 125(8), 1065–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, G., & Gilson, L. (1994). Reforming the health sector in developing countries: The central role of policy analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 9, 353–70.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2005). World Health Organization assessment instrument for mental health systems – WHO-AIMS version 2.2. World Health Organization. https://doi.org/https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70771
   Google Scholar
• Wyn, J., & White, R. (2015). Complex worlds, complex identities: Complexity in youth studies. In D. Woodman & A. Bennett (Eds.), Youth cultures, transitions, and generations. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, S., & Roulstone, A. (2013). Social policy and transitions to training and work for disabled young people in the United Kingdom: Neo-liberalism for better and for worse? Disability & Society, 28(4), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar