Predicting compliance with interpersonal masking requests: insights from relational framing and reactance theories

References

• Anderson, C. M., & Martin, M. M. (1995). The effects of communication motives, interaction involvement, and loneliness on satisfaction: A model of small groups. Small Group Research, 26(1), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496495261007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asai, N., & Mikamo, H. (2021). Prophylaxis of influenza viral transmission: What is the Current prophylaxis? In J. Fujita (Ed.), Influenza (pp. 191–197). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9109-9_19
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D. (2013). Supportive and persuasive communication: Theoretical intersections. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 237–255). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., & Burleson, B. R. (2008). Explaining variations in the effects of supportive messages a dual-process framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 32(1), 355–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2008.11679082
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cegala, D. J. (1981). Interaction involvement: A cognitive dimension of communicative competence. Communication Education, 30(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528109378460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegala, D. J. (1984). Affective and cognitive manifestations of interaction involvement during unstructured and competitive interactions. Communications Monographs, 51(4), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegala, D. J. (2009). Interaction involvement. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (pp. 526–528). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959384.n199
   Google Scholar
• Cegala, D., Savage, G., Brunner, C., & Conrad, A. (1982). An elaboration of the meaning of interaction involvement: Toward the development of a theoretical concept. Communication Monographs, 49(4), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758209376087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Anderson, J. W., & Knobloch, L. K. (2002). Interpersonal influence. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 423–474). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27(4), 461–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Solomon, D. H., & Samp, J. A. (1996). Framing social reality: The relevance of relational judgments. Communication Research, 23(6), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023006004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Tian, X., Cruz, S. M., Smith, R. A., & Shen, L. (2021). Persuasive messages, social norms, and reactance: A study of masking behavior during a COVID-19 campus health campaign. Health Communication, 38(7), 1–11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2007579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorrance-Hall, E., Wilcox, S., Holmstrom, A., McGraw, J., & Schmalzle, R. (2021). Reactance to healthy eating and physical activity messages: Face threat and face management strategies in memorable daily conversations among couples. Health Communication, 38(7), 1404–1415. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2010354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., Vallade, J. I., Huber, C. J., Tristan, A., & Murphy, A. A. (2023). An analysis and comparison of the instructor-student relationship using relational framing theory. Western Journal of Communication, 1–20. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2023.2183364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, C. G. (2019). Measuring Relational Meaning Making: A Reoperationalization of Relational Framing Theory ( Master’s thesis). University of Georgia. https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/graves_clint_g_201905_ma.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A. (2016). Interpreting social–sexual communication: Relational framing theory and social–sexual communication, attraction, and intent. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen, M. L. M., Henningsen, D. D., Cruz, M. G., & Morrill, J. (2003). Social influence in groups: A comparative application of relational framing theory and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication Monographs, 70(3), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000167398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S.-M. (1992). Hong’s psychological reactance scale: A further factor analytic validation. Psychological Reports, 70(2), 512–514. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.70.2.512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S.-M., & Faedda, S. (1996). Refinement of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056001014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y. (2012). Social diffusion of campaign effects: Campaign-generated interpersonal communication as a mediator of antitobacco campaign effects. Communication Research, 39(1), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210389029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, M., & Dragojevic, M. (2013). Explaining the process of resistance to persuasion: A politeness theory-based approach. Communication Research, 40(4), 559–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211420136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, J., Erickson, W. W., Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Cotfas, L.-A. (2021). # MaskOn!# MaskOff! Digital polarization of mask-wearing in the United States during COVID-19. PloS One, 16(4), e0250817. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, R. M., & Solomon, D. H. (2021). Relational framing theory. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt Eds., Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 76–88). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195511-7
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (2012). On being persuaded: Some basic distinctions. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 70–82). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218410.n5
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G., Boster, F., Roloff, M., & Seibold, D. (1977). Compliance‐gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757709390113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardoe, I.(2020). Applied Regression Modeling (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119615941
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1–24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. (2006). Definitions and approaches to conflict and communication. In The SAGE handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976176
   Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L. (2012). What is the best measure of psychological reactance? An empirical test of two measures. Health Communication, 27(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.567446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, B. D., & Siegel, J. T. (2018). A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. Motivation Science, 4(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. B., & Bell, R. A. (2021). Predictors of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Results of a nationwide survey. Vaccine: X, 39(7), 1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.010
   Google Scholar
• Scheid, J. L., Lupien, S. P., Ford, G. S., & West, S. L. (2020). Commentary: Physiological and psychological impact of face mask usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P. (2016). Relational frames as mediators of everyday talk and relational satisfaction in stepparent–stepchild relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514568751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L. (2019). Features of empathy–arousing strategic messages. Health Communication, 34(11), 1329–1339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1485078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. (2006). Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: Multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(5), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H. (2006). A relational framing perspective on perceptions of social-sexual communication at work. In B. A. LePoire & R. M. Dailey (Eds.), Applied research in interpersonal communication: Family communication, health communication, and communicating across social boundaries (pp. 271–298). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., Dillard, J. P., & Anderson, J. W. (2002). Episode type, attachment orientation, and frame salience: Evidence for a theory of relational framing. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., & Salmon, S. K. (2017). Relational framing: (Dillard, Solomon, & Samp, 1996). In D. L. Worthington & G. D. Bodie (Eds.), The sourcebook of listening research: Methodology and measures (pp. 537–544). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Asmundson, G. J., & Capraro, V. (2021). Negative attitudes about facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic: The dual importance of perceived ineffectiveness and psychological reactance. PLoS One, 16(2), e0246317. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X., Solomon, D. H., & Brisini, K. S. C. (2020). How the comforting process fails: Psychological reactance to support messages. Journal of Communication, 70(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. R., Rasmussen, E. E., & King, A. J. (2015). Restrictive mediation and unintended effects: Serial multiple mediation analysis explaining the role of reactance in US adolescents. Journal of Children and Media, 9(4), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1088873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. R. (2002). Seeking and resisting compliance: Why people say what they do when trying to influence others. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233185
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. L., Chawla, G., Chen, L., & Farmer, A. (2020). Tracking mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper (2020-104). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3667149
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. (2020). Effects of freedom restoration, language variety, and issue type on psychological reactance. Health Communication, 35(11), 1316–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1631565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Warner, M. E. (2020). COVID-19 policy differences across US states: Shutdowns, reopening, and mask mandates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9520. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Bowen, S. A. (2023). Factors related to compliance with CDC COVID-19 guidelines: Media use, partisan identity, science knowledge, and risk assessment. Western Journal of Communication, 1–28. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2023.2219239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar