Invisible for a few but essential for many: the role of Histotechnologists in the establishment of digital pathology

References

• Huisman A, Looijen A, van den Brink SM, et al. Creation of a fully digital pathology slide archive by high-volume tissue slide scanning. Hum Pathol. 2010 May;41(5):751–757. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.08.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraggetta F, Caputo A, Guglielmino R, et al. A survival guide for the rapid transition to a fully digital workflow: the “Caltagirone example”. Diagnostics. 2021 Oct 1;11(10):1916. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraggetta F, L’imperio V, Ameisen D, et al. Best practice recommendations for the implementation of a digital pathology workflow in the anatomic pathology laboratory by the European society of digital and integrative pathology (ESDIP). Diagnostics. 2021 Nov 1;11(11):2167. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffner S, Colgan O, Doolan C Leica biosystems knowledge pathway. What is digital pathology? benefits, future trends & more. [cited 2022 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.leicabiosystems.com/en-pt/knowledge-pathway/digital-pathology/#What_is_Digital_Pathology
   Google Scholar
• Cross S, Furness P, Igali L, et al. Best practice recommendations for implementing digital pathology. The Royal College of Pathologists [Internet]. 2018;3–5. Available from: https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/f465d1b3-797b-4297-b7fedc00b4d77e51/Best-practice-recommendations-for-implementing-digital-pathology.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turnquist C, Roberts-Gant S, Hemsworth H, et al. On the edge of a digital pathology transformation: views from a cellular pathology laboratory focus group. J Pathol Inform. 2019 Jan 1;10(1):37. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_38_19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schömig-Markiefka B, Pryalukhin A, Hulla W, et al. Quality control stress test for deep learning-based diagnostic model in digital pathology. Mod Pathol. 2021 Dec 1;34(12):2098–2108. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00859-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aeffner F, Adissu HA, Boyle MC et al. Digital microscopy, image analysis, and virtual slide repository. Vol. 59. ILAR Journal. Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 66–79. doi:10.1093/ilar/ily007.
   Google Scholar
• Betmouni S. Diagnostic digital pathology implementation: learning from the digital health experience. Digit Health. 2021;7:205520762110202. doi: 10.1177/20552076211020240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bainbridge SCR Testing times to come? An evaluation of pathology capacity across the UK. 2016 [cited 2022 Aug 22]. Available from: www.cancerresearchuk.org
   Google Scholar
• Williams BJ, Bottoms D, Treanor D. Future-proofing pathology: the case for clinical adoption of digital pathology. J Clin Pathol. 2017 Dec 1;70(12):1010–1018. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robboy SJ, Weintraub S, Horvath AE, et al. Pathologist workforce in the United States: I. Development of a predictive model to examine factors influencing supply. Arch Pathol Lab Med [Internet]. 2013 Dec 1 [cited 2022 Dec 18];137(12):1723–1732. Available from: https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/137/12/1723/186010/Pathologist-Workforce-in-the-United-States-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Janabi S, Huisman A, Van Diest PJ. Digital pathology: Current status and future perspectives. Histopathology. 2012;61(1):1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03814.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin J, Treanor D. Digital pathology in clinical use: where are we now and what is holding us back? Histopathology. 2017 Jan 1;70(1):134–145. doi: 10.1111/his.12993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lujan G, Quigley JC, Hartman D, et al. Dissecting the business case for adoption and implementation of digital pathology: a white paper from the digital pathology association. J Pathol Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):17. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_67_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richelia Jara-Lazaro A, Paulraj TT, Teh M et al. Digital pathology: exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice. Pathol. 2010;6:512–518.
   Google Scholar
• Ho J, Ahlers SM, Stratman C, et al. Can digital pathology result in cost savings? A financial projection for digital pathology implementation at a large integrated health care organization. J Pathol Inform. 2014 Jan;5(1):33. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.139714
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartman DJ, Pantanowitz L, Mchugh JS, et al. Enterprise implementation of digital pathology: feasibility, challenges, and opportunities. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30(5):555–560. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-9946-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baidoshvili A, Bucur A, van Leeuwen J, et al. Evaluating the benefits of digital pathology implementation: time savings in laboratory logistics. Histopathology. 2018 Nov 1;73(5):784–794. doi: 10.1111/his.13691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathonikos N, Nguyen TQ, Spoto CP, et al. Being fully digital: perspective of a Dutch academic pathology laboratory. Histopathology. 2019 Nov 1;75(5):621–635. doi: 10.1111/his.13953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Johnsen S, Zeuthen MC, et al. On the road to digital pathology in Denmark—national survey and interviews. J Digit Imaging. 2022;35(5):1189–1206. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00638-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retamero JA, Aneiros-Fernandez J, Del Moral RG. Complete digital pathology for routine histopathology diagnosis in a multicenter Hospital network. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(2):221–228. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0541-OA
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathonikos N, Nguyen TQ, Van Diest PJ. Rocky road to digital diagnostics: implementation issues and exhilarating experiences. J Clin Pathol. 2021 Jul 1;74(7):415–420. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eloy C, Vale J, Curado M, et al. Digital pathology workflow implementation at IPATIMUP. Diagnostics. 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 5];11(11):2111. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betmouni S Diagnostic digital pathology implementation: learning from the digital health experience. [cited 2022 Jul 4]. Available from: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage
   Google Scholar
• Temprana-Salvador J, López-García P, Vives JC, et al. DigiPatICS: digital pathology transformation of the Catalan health institute network of 8 hospitals—planification, implementation, and preliminary results. Diagnostics. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):852. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montezuma D, Monteiro A, Fraga J, et al. Digital pathology implementation in private practice: specific challenges and opportunities. Diagnostics. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):529. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unternaehrer J, Grobholz R, Janowczyk A, et al. Current opinion, status and future development of digital pathology in Switzerland. J Clin Pathol. 2020 Jun 1;73(6):341–346. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathonikos N, Veta M, Huisman A, et al. Going fully digital: perspective of a Dutch academic pathology lab. J Pathol Inform. 2013 Jan;4(1):15. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.114206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Araújo LDA, Do Amaral-Silva GK, Pérez-de-Oliveira ME, et al. Fully digital pathology laboratory routine and remote reporting of oral and maxillofacial diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: a validation study. Virchows Arch. 2021;479(3):585–595. Available from: https://w2.fop.unicamp.br/patologia/index.php?sid=2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian H, Subramanian S. Improving diagnosis through digital pathology: proof-of-concept implementation using smart contracts and decentralized file storage. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2022 Mar 28 cited 2022 Apr 17;24(3):e34207. doi: 10.2196/34207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng CL, Azhar R, Sng SHA, et al. Enabling digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: navigating through the implementation journey in an academic medical centre. J Clin Pathol [Internet]. 2016 Sep 1 [cited 2022 Jul 6];69(9):784–792. Available from: https://jcp.bmj.com/content/69/9/784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen MLN, Frederiksen MH, Marcussen N, et al. Prior to implementation of digital pathology—assessment of expectations among staff by means of normalization process theory. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2022 Jun 14 [cited 2022 Jul 5];19(12):7253. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning L, Colling R, Rittscher J, et al. Implementation of digital pathology into diagnostic practice: perceptions and opinions of histopathology trainees and implications for training. J Clin Pathol. 2020 Apr 1;73(4):223–227. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B, Treanor D. The leeds guide to digital pathology; 2018 [cited 2022 Oct 16]. Available from: https://www.leicabiosystems.com/sites/default/files/media_document-file/2022-01/Brochure%20-%20Leeds%20Guide%20to%20Digital%20Pathology%20%2818778%20RevA%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ho J, Aridor O, Parwani AV. Use of contextual inquiry to understand anatomic pathology workflow: implications for digital pathology adoption. J Pathol Inform [Internet]. 2012 Jan [cited 2022 Aug 14];3(1):35. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23243553/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorstenson S, Molin J, Lundström C. Implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: digital pathology experiences 2006-2013. J Pathol Inform [Internet]. 2014 Jan [cited 2022 Jul 6];5(1):14. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4023034/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coulter C, Mckay F, Hallowell N, et al. Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of digital pathology. Clinical Research J Pathol Clin Res. 2022;8(2):101–115. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atallah NM, Toss MS, Verrill C, et al. Potential quality pitfalls of digitalized whole slide image of breast pathology in routine practice. Mod Pathol. 2021 Jul 1;35(7):903–910. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-01000-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuraw A, Staup M, Klopfleisch R, et al. Developing a qualification and verification strategy for digital tissue image analysis in toxicological pathology. Toxicol Pathol. 2021;49(4):773–783. doi: 10.1177/0192623320980310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chlipala EA, Butters M, Brous M, et al. Impact of preanalytical factors during histology processing on section suitability for digital image analysis. Toxicol Pathol. 2021 Jun 1;49(4):755–772. doi: 10.1177/0192623320970534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster JD, Dunstan RW. Whole-slide imaging and automated image analysis: considerations and opportunities in the practice of pathology. Vet Pathol. 2014 Jan;51(1):211–223. doi: 10.1177/0300985813503570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowczyk A, Zuo R, Gilmore H, et al. HistoQC: an open-source quality control tool for digital pathology slides. JCO Clin Cancer Inform [Internet]. 2019;(3): 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith J, Johnsen S, Zeuthen MC, et al. On the road to digital pathology in Denmark—national survey and interviews. J Digit Imaging. [cited 2022 Jul 6];35(5):1189–1206. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00638-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diploma of specialist practice - institute of biomedical science [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 27]. Available from: https://www.iHTL.org/education/specialist-qualifications/diploma-of-specialist-practice/
   Google Scholar
• Fraggetta F, Garozzo S, Zannoni G, et al. Routine digital pathology workflow: the Catania experience. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8(1):51. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_58_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raab SS, Grzybicki DM, Condel JL, et al. Effect of Lean method implementation in the histopathology section of an anatomical pathology laboratory. J Clin Pathol [Internet]. 2008 Nov 1 [cited 2022 Nov 13];61(11):1193–1199. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.051326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liker JK. The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Roh EH, Park S. A literature review of quality, costs, process-associated with digital pathology. J Exercise Rehabil Korean Soc Exercise Rehabil. 2021;17(1):11–14. doi: 10.12965/jer.2142018.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa D. Automation, lean, six sigma: synergies for improving laboratory efficiency. J Med Biochem. 2010 Oct 1;29(4):339–348. doi: 10.2478/v10011-010-0038-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lujan G, Quigley JC, Hartman D, et al. Dissecting the business case for adoption and implementation of digital pathology: a white paper from the digital pathology association. J Pathol Inform. 2021 Jan 1;12(1):17. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_67_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans AJ, Salama ME, Henricks WH, et al. Implementation of whole slide imaging for clinical purposes issues to consider from the perspective of early adopters WSI implementation for clinical use. Canada Arch Pathol Lab Med [Internet]. 2017;141(7):944–959. Available from: http://meridian.allenpress.com/doi/pdf/10.5858/arpa.2016-0074-OA
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams BJ, Bottoms D, Clark D, et al. Future-proofing pathology part 2: building a business case for digital pathology. J Clin Pathol. 2019 Mar 1;72(3):198–205. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A, Balis UGJ, Cheng J, et al. Contemporary whole slide imaging devices and their applications within the modern pathology department: a selected hardware review. J Pathol Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):50. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_66_21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Browning L, Fryer E, Roskell D, et al. Role of digital pathology in diagnostic histopathology in the response to COVID-19: results from a survey of experience in a UK tertiary referral hospital. J Clin Pathol [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 7];74(2):129–132. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam S, Chong Y, Jung CK, et al. Introduction to digital pathology and computer-aided pathology. J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(2):125–134. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2019.12.31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schü Ffler PJ, Geneslaw L, Vijay D, et al. Integrated digital pathology at scale: a solution for clinical diagnostics and cancer research at a large academic medical center. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2021;28(9):1874–1884. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AI-powered tissue biomarker analysis - visiopharm [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 31]. Available from: https://visiopharm.com/visiopharm-digital-image-analysis-software-features/ai-features/
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar J, Iyengar J. Whole slide imaging: the futurescape of histopathology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2021;64(3):596. doi: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_972_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aeffner F, Zarella MD, Buchbinder N, et al. Introduction to digital image analysis in whole-slide imaging: a white paper from the digital pathology association. J Pathol Inform. 2019 Jan 1;10(1):9. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_82_18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pantanowitz L, Hartman D, Qi Y, et al. Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses. Diagn Pathol [Internet]. 2020 Jul 4 [[cited 2023 May 31]];15(1):1–10. Available from: https://diagnosticpathology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13000-020-00995-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim A, Lashen A, Toss M, et al. Assessment of mitotic activity in breast cancer: revisited in the digital pathology era. J Clin Pathol [Internet]. 2022 Jun 1 [cited 2023 May 31];75(6):365–372. Available from: https://jcp.bmj.com/content/75/6/365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva LM, Pereira EM, Salles PGO, et al. Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system. J Pathol. 2021 Jun 1;254(2):147–158. doi: 10.1002/path.5662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantanowitz L, Sinard JH, Henricks WH, et al. CAP laboratory improvement programs validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology guideline from the College of American pathologists pathology and laboratory quality center. Archives Of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2022 Jul 5];137(12):1710–1722. Available from: www.archivesofpathology.org
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautista PA, Hashimoto N, Yagi Y. Color standardization in whole slide imaging using a color calibration slide. J Pathol Inform. 2014 Jan;5(1):4. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.126153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bui MM, Riben MW, Allison KH, et al. Quantitative image analysis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry for breast cancer: guideline from the college of American pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(10):1180–1195. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0378-CP
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) Assay (US FDA Approved) [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 1]. Available from: https://diagnostics.roche.com/global/en/products/tests/ventana-pd-l1-_sp142-assay1.html
   Google Scholar
• Cheng CL, Tan PH. Digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: beyond technology into best practice and service management. J Clin Pathol [Internet]. 2017 May 1 [cited 2022 Jul 4];70(5):454–457. Available from: https://jcp.bmj.com/content/70/5/454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna MG, Reuter VE, Samboy J, et al. Implementation of digital pathology offers clinical and operational increase in efficiency and cost savings. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(12):1545–1555. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0514-OA
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue T, Yagi Y. Color standardization and optimization in whole slide imaging. Clin Diagn Pathol. 2020;4(1). doi: 10.15761/CDP.1000139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romero Lauro G, Cable W, Lesniak A, et al. Digital pathology consultations-a new era in digital imaging, challenges and practical applications. [cited 2022 Jul 5]. Available from: www.aperio.com
   Google Scholar
• Williams B, Brettle D, Aslam M, et al. Guidance for remote reporting of digital pathology slides during periods of exceptional service pressure: an emergency response from the UK royal college of pathologists. J Pathol Inform. Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. 2020;11(1):12. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_23_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schüffler PJ, Geneslaw L, Yarlagadda DVK, et al. Integrated digital pathology at scale: a solution for clinical diagnostics and cancer research at a large academic medical center. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2021 Sep 1;28(9):1874–1884. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’imperio V, Gibilisco F, Fraggetta F. What is essential is (no more) invisible to the eyes: the introduction of blocdoc in the digital pathology workflow. J Pathol Inform. 2021 Jan 1;12(1):32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Policy PP. Minimum period of retention of laboratory records and materials. 2020 September.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins B. The retention and storage of pathological records and specimens. 5th ed. Royal College of Pathologists [Internet]; 2015 [cited 2023 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.rcpath.org/static/049ea966-df5c-4a9f-9353ba24a69bb808/The-retention-and-storage-of-pathological-records-and-specimens-5th-edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams BJ, Jayewardene D, Treanor D. Digital immunohistochemistry implementation, training and validation: experience and technical notes from a large clinical laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 2019;72(5):373–378. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digital pathology certificate - national society for histotechnology [Internet]. [ cited 2023 May 27]. Available from: https://www.nsh.org/learn/pathology-certificate
   Google Scholar
• Education - PathLAKE: PathLAKE [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 25]. Available from: https://www.pathlake.org/education/
   Google Scholar
• Programme result - UK NEQAS [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 27]. Available from: https://ukneqas.org.uk/programmes/result/?programme=digital-pathology-imaging
   Google Scholar
• HQIP whole slide image quality improvement program-HQWSI [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 27]. Available from: https://estore.cap.org/OA_HTML/xxCAPibeCCtpItmDspRte.jsp?section=10650&item=688517&sitex=10020:22372:US
   Google Scholar