The entanglement of accounting goodwill: Einstein’s “spooky action at a distance”

References

• Abreu, R. (2016). From accounting to firm value. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30290-8
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, N. S. (2012). New quantum theory. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(11), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2012/v5i11.5
   Google Scholar
• Allee, V. (2008). Value network analysis and value conversion of tangible and intangible assets. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810845777
   Google Scholar
• Baboukardos, D., & Rimmel, G. (2014). Goodwill under IFRS: Relevance and disclosures in an unfavorable environment. Accounting Forum, 38(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. M. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. M. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2010.0206
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. M. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., & Schulte, S. (2017). Representing the market perspective: Fair value measurement for non-financial assets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 56, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 70(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1086/258584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J. S. (1964). On the Einstein podolsky rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1(3), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, E. (2015). From the firm to economic policy: The problem of coase’s cost. History of Political Economy, 47(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3153152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betancourt, L., & Irving, J. H. (2019). The Challenge of Accounting for Goodwill: Impact of a Possible Return to Amortization, The CPA Journal. Retrieved in 04/07/2020 in https://www.cpajournal.com/2019/11/27/the-challengeof-accounting-for-goodwill/.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.-C., & Passeron, J.-C. (1991). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries. Translated by Richard Nice. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2017). Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, A., Hoogendoorn, M., & Naarding, E. (2015). Will the changes proposed to the conceptual framework’s definitions and recognition criteria provide a better basis for IASB standard setting? Accounting and Business Research, 45(5), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1048769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruza, P., Busemeyer, J. R., & Gabora, L. (2009). Introduction to the special issue on quantum cognition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(5), 303–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., & Veloso, L. (2018). Métodos Móveis. Tempo Social. Revista de Sociologia da USP, 30(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2018.142258
   Google Scholar
• Busco, C., & Quattrone, P. (2018). In search of the “perfect One”: How accounting as a maieutic machine sustains inventions through generative ‘ in -tensions’. Management Accounting Research, 39, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Bruza, P. (2012). Quantum models of cognition and decision. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., Wang, Z., & Townsend, J. T. (2006). Quantum dynamics of human decision-making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50(3), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrita, M. R., & Vaz, J. L. (2005). Intellectual capital and value creation: Evidence from the Portuguese banking industry. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 11–20. https://www.academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejkm/article/view/731
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In The laws of the market (pp. 244–269). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Canning, J. B. (1929). The Economics of accountancy: A Critical analysis of accounting theory. The Ronald Press Company, 367 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, B., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S., & Vidgen, R. (2010). On sociomateriality of information systems and organizing, MIS Quarterly, Call for Papers MISQ.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, A., Toke, I. M., Patriarca, M., & Abergel, F. (2011). Econophysics review: I. Empirical facts. Quantitative Finance, 11(7), 991–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2010.539248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1990). Accounting and the theory of the firm. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1-3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, J. R., & Volkan, A. G. (1988). Accounting for goodwill. Accounting Horizons, 2(1), 35–41. https://www.proquest.com/openview/687ccd2d6d3d4a3a2fb545aca71bb0ad/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=3330
   Google Scholar
• Courtis, J. K. (1983). Business goodwill: Conceptual clarification Via accounting, legal and etymological perspectives. Accounting Historians Journal, 10(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.2308/0148-4184.10.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Cozza, M. (2021). Elderliness: The agential inseparability of Ageing and assistive technologies. In A. Peine, B. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-Gerontechnology – interdisciplinary Critical studies of Ageing and technology (pp. 70–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Demski, J. S., Fitzgerald, S. A., Ijiri, Y., Ijiri, Y., & Lin, H. (2006). Quantum information and accounting information: Their salient features and conceptual applications. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(4), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.05.004
   Google Scholar
• d’Espagnat, B. (1979). The quantum theory and reality. Scientific American, 241(5), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1179-158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, K. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1999). Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organization Science, 10(3), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, R. (2002). Classifications manipulation and Nash accounting standards. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1125–1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, C. (2004). The measurement and recognition of intangible assets: Then and now. Accounting Forum, 28(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Egger, D. J., Gutiérrez, R. G., Mestre, J. C., & Woerner, S. (2020). Credit risk analysis using quantum computers. IEEE Transactions on Computers (Early Access), 70(12), 2136–2145. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2020.3038063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality Be considered complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777–780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
   Google Scholar
• El-Tawy, N., & Tollington, T. (2013). Some thoughts on the recognition of assets, notably in respect of intangible assets. Accounting Forum, 37(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Falk, H., & Gordon, L. (1977). Imperfect markets and the nature of goodwill. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 4(4), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1977.tb00727.x
   Google Scholar
• Fellingham, J., & Schroeder, D. (2006). Quantum information and accounting. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(1-2), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filip, A., Jeanjean, T., & Paugam, L. (2015). Using real activities to avoid goodwill impairment losses: Evidence and effect on future performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(3-4), 515–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, I. (1906). The nature of capital and income. The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J. S. D. (2018). Posthuman vulnerability, criticism, and the agency of the matter. Natureza Humana, 20(1), 58–68. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-24302018000100004&lng=pt&tlng=pt
   Google Scholar
• Garzella, S., Ferri, S., Fiorentino, R., & Paolone, F. (2019). The (in)coherence in accounting for goodwill. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2018-0398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gröblacher, S., Paterek, T., Kaltenbaek, R., Brukner, Č, Żukowski, M., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2007). An experimental test of non-local realism. Nature, 446(7138), 871–875. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, L. (1998). Spooky action at a distance in quantum mechanics. Contemporary Physics, 39(6), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/001075198181757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haven, E., & Khrennikov, A. (2013). Quantum social science. Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, S. L., Lewis, B. L., & Shaw, W. H. (2000). Valuation of the components of purchased goodwill. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(2), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, L., Hardman, M., Noakes, J., & Wegerif, R. (2018). Making the case for a material-dialogic approach to science education. Studies in Science Education, 54(2), 141–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1598036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højgaard, L., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309359965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holford, W. D. (2018). An agential realist perspective on the construction and flow of knowledge: The case of dynamic entanglement and “cuts” within an aircraft engine manufacturing workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(7), 1442–1470. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2017-0342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höne, K. E. (2017). Quantum social Science. Oxford Bibliographies Online. Retrieved in oct 22nd, 2020 at https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199743292/obo-9780199743292-0203.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, T., & Powell, A. (1985). Making sense of research into the organizational and social aspects of management accounting: A review of its underlying assumptions. Journal of Management Studies, 22(5), 429–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1985.tb00007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, H. P. (1972). A History of the Issues and Problems Surrounding Goodwill in Accounting, Doctoral Dissertation, the University of Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Huikku, J., Mouritsen, J., & Silvola, H. (2017). Relative reliability and the recognisable firm: Calculating goodwill impairment value. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 56(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Iatridis, G. E., Pappas, K., & Walker, M. (2022). Narrative disclosure quality and the timeliness of goodwill impairments. The British Accounting Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.100978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, E., & Moya, D. (2005). Econophysics: From game theory and information theory to quantum mechanics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 348, 505–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., & Petrone, K. (1998). Is goodwill an asset? Accounting Horizons, 12(3), 293–303. https://www.proquest.com/openview/57173e4608a4fa90b102082a1e3d6358/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=3330
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S., & Messner, M. (2012). Enabling control and the problem of incomplete performance indicators. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(8), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justesen, L., & Mouritsen, J. (2011). Effects of actor-network theory in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(2), 161–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571111100672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, B. M., & Thiele, K. (2014). Diffraction: Onto-epistemology, quantum physics and the critical humanities. Parallax, 20(3), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 52–63. https://hbr.org/2004/02/measuring-the-strategic-readiness-of-intangible-assets
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliestik, T., Kovacova, M., Podhorska, I., & Kliestikova, J. (2018). Searching for key sources of goodwill creation as new global managerial challenge. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.17.1.12
   Google Scholar
• Kutner, R., Ausloos, M., Grech, D., Di Matteo, T., Schinckus, C., & Stanley, H. E. (2019). Econophysics and sociophysics: Their milestones & challenges. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 516, 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. A. (1971). An example of will-o'-the-wisp accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 1(4), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1971.9728985
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, P.-C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2020). Auditors’ liability to lenders and auditor conservatism. Management Science, 66(8), 3788–3798. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustosa, P. R. B. (2017). A New Approach to Accounting Goodwill (and other identified intangibles with indefinite useful lives): Theory and Empirical Evidence, Working Paper. Retrieved in oct 5th, 2019 at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3023311.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, R., & Hopkins, R. (1988). Goodwill – An example of puzzle-solving in accounting. Abacus, 24(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1988.tb00204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, E. (1972). Contribuição à Avaliação do Ativo Intangível. Doctoral Dissertation. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade. Universidade de São Paulo, USP.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzi, F., André, P., Dionysiou, D., & Tsalavoutas, I. (2017). Compliance with goodwill-related mandatory disclosure requirements and the cost of equity capital. Accounting and Business Research, 47(3), 268–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1254593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennicken, A., & Miller, P. (2012). Accounting, territorialization and power. Foucault Studies, 3(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i13.3503
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Power, M. (2013). Accounting, organizing and economizing: Connecting accounting research and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 557–605. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.783668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, L. (2017). Carving nature at its joints: The entity concept in an entangled society. Accounting Historians Journal, 44(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-10556
   Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, J. (2003). Intellectual capital and the capital market: The circulability of intellectual capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570310464246
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagata, K., Laskowski, W., Wieśniak, M., & Żukowski, M. (2004). Rotational invariance as an additional constraint on local realism. Physical Review Letters, 93(230403), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.230403
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (1999). O manifesto da transdisciplinaridade. Translation into Portuguese by Lúcia Pereira de Souza. Triom.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, D., O’Regan, P., Coates, B., Kennedy, T., Keary, B., & Berkery, G. (2003). Human interaction: The critical source of intangible value. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930310455405
   Google Scholar
• Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, K. V., Lustosa, P. R. B., & Gonçalves, A. O. (2021). O goodwill na perspectiva da appreciative inquiry (AI): a inovação transformando o patrimônio intangível. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 18(47), 03–17. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2021.e75538
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). 10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orrell, D. (2018). Quantum economics. Economic Thought, 7(2), 63–81. http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/2018/11/WEA-ET-7-2.pdf#page=65
   Google Scholar
• Pinnuck, M., & Shekhar, C. (2013). The profit versus loss heuristic and firm financing decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6-7), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2009). A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1665), 2171–2178. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebentrost, P., Gupt, B., & Bromley, T. R. (2018). Quantum computational finance: Monte carlo pricing of financial derivatives. Physical Review A, 98(022321), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.022321
   Google Scholar
• Robson, K. (1992). Accounting numbers as “inscription”: Action at a distance and the development of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(7), 685–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90019-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, J. A. C., Martínez, A. A., & Mazón, A. C. (2021). Economic effects of goodwill accounting practices: Systematic amortisation versus impairment test. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 50(2), 224–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2020.1778376
   Google Scholar
• Sanz, A. F., Borondo, F., & Miret-Artes, S. (2002). Particle diffraction studied using quantum trajectories. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14(24), 6109–6145. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/14/24/312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2010). Materiality and social life. Nature and Culture, 5(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2010.050202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2009). Getting the truth”: exploring the material grounds of institutional dynamics in social media. Working Paper Series - London School of Economics and Political Science, 177, 1–25. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/26699/1/WP_177.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open systems perspectives. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sehgal, M. (2014). Diffractive propositions: Reading alfred north whitehead with donna Haraway and karen barad. Parallax, 20(3), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalm, L. K., Meyer-Scott, E., Christensen, B. G., Bierhorst, P., Wayne, M. A., Stevens, M. J., Gerrits, T., Glancy, S., Hamel, D. R., Allman, M. S., & Coakley, K. J. (2015). Strong loophole-free test of local realism. Physical Review Letters, 115(250402), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402
   Google Scholar
• Souza, A. M. (2008). Um Estudo de Emaranhamento e Desigualdades de Bell em Sistemas Térmicos Magnéticos. Doctoral Dissertation, Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas. 164p.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatopoulos, N., Egger, D. J., Sun, Y., Zoufal, C., Iten, R., Shen, N., & Woerner, S. (2020). Option pricing using quantum computers. Quantum, 4(291), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-07-06-291
   Google Scholar
• Stauffer, D. (2013). A biased review of sociophysics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 151(1-2), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0604-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias-Renstrøm, S., & Køppe, S. (2020). Karen barad, psychology, and subject models: Why we need to take experience seriously. Theory & Psychology, 30(5), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320903089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueblood, J. S., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2011). A quantum probability account of order effects in inference. Cognitive Science, 35(8), 1518–1552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01197.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J. R., Atmanspacher, H., & Pothos, E. M. (2013). The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(4), 672–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, H., & Moehrle, S. R. (2016). Accounting for goodwill: An academic literature review and analysis to inform the debate. Research in Accounting Regulation, 28(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2016.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum mind and social science: Unifying physical and social ontology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheatley, M. (2006). Leadership and the New science: Discovering order in a chaotic world (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Wiese, A. (2005). Accounting for goodwill: The transition from amortisation to impairment – an impact assessment. Meditari Accountancy Research, 13(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222529200500007
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. F. (2009). Reshaping accounting research: Living in the world in which we live. Accounting Forum, 33(4), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Wittmann, B., Ramelow, S., Steinlechner, F., Langford, N. K., Brunner, N., Wiseman, H. M., Ursin, R., & Zeilinger, A. (2012). Loophole-free einstein–podolsky–rosen experiment via quantum steering. New Journal of Physics, 14(053030|53030), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053030
   Google Scholar
• Woerner, S., & Egger, D. J. (2019). Quantum risk analysis. npj Quantum Information, 5(15), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0130-6
   Google Scholar
• Yukalov, V. I., & Sornette, D. (2011). Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement. Theory and Decision, 70(3), 283–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-010-9202-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, Y. (2008). Discretionary behavior with respect to the adoption of SFAS no. 142 and the behavior of security prices. Review of Accounting and Finance, 7(1), 38–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/14757700810853842
   Google Scholar