Understanding the role of online teaching assistants in student engagement

References

• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S., & Te Wiata, I. (2020). Maori mentors: Expectations and perceptions. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 24(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.195553051981261
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blouin, D. D., & Moss, A. R. (2015). Graduate student teacher training: Still relevant (and missing?) 20 years later. Teaching Sociology, 43(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X14565516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman, J. S. (2013). Graduate student teaching development: Evaluating the effectiveness of training in relation to graduate student characteristics. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v43i1.2072
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. J. (2020). Academic communities of engagement: An expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 807–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. G. (2017). The persistence and attrition of online learners. School Leadership Review, 12(1), 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley-Cyr, L., & Hevers, J. (2021). Using peer assisted learning to improve academic engagement and progression of first year online law students. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, M. Y., Zhang, G. Y., & Amer, B. (2019). Social networks among students, peer TAs, and instructors and their impacts on student learning in the blended environment: A model development and testing. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44(1), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04436
   Google Scholar
• de Smet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008). Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour. Computers & Education, 50(1), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, R. (2009). Implications of online learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 23(2), 93–104. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/471
   Google Scholar
• Gill, B., Walsh, L., Wulsin, C. S., Matulewicz, H., Severn, V., Grau, E., Lee, A., & Kerwin, T. (2015). Inside online charter schools: A report of the National study of online charter schools. Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/download-media?MediaItemId={66DF6691-3601-49B9-8A07-365F97A55C7C}
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, C. M., Niederhauser, D. S., Davis, N. E., Roblyer, M.D., & Gilbert, S.B. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. Journal of Communication, 16(1), 17–24. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/entities/publication/88e846fc-f8b8-432d-91c7-483dd41f5aaa
   Google Scholar
• Hensen, C., & Barbera, J. (2019). Assessing affective differences between a virtual general chemistry experiment and a similar hands-on experiment. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(10), 2097–2108. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmons, R., Charles, G. R., & Rick, W. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 176–198. https://citejournal.org/volume-20/issue-1-20/general/the-picrat-model-for-technology-integration-in-teacher-preparation/
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W.-C., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W.-C., & Yang, S. C. (2013). Exploring the roles of Google.doc and peer e-tutors in English writing. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 12(1), 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B., & Tomlinson, M. (2017). Critical and alternative perspectives on student engagement. Higher Education Policy, 30(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022). Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michinov, N., Brunot, S., Bohec, O., Le Juhel, J., & Delaval, M. (2011). Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 56, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1980). Independent study. In R. Boyd & J. Apps (Eds.), Redefining the discipline of adult education (pp. 16–31). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction [Editorial]. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. D. (2005). Course completion rates among distance learners: Identifying possible methods to improve retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4), 1–26. https://ojdla.com/archive/winter84/nash84.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oviatt, D. R., Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Davies, R. S. (2018). Online student use of a proximate community of engagement at an independent study program. Online Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1153
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2004). The graduate teaching assistant (GTA): Lessons from North American experience. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000216660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M. A., Ashe, D., Boersma, J., Hicks, R., & Bennett, V. (2015). Good teaching starts here: Applied learning at the Graduate Teaching Assistant Institute. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(3), 84–110. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v45i3.187546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansone, N., Ligorio, M. B., & Buglass, S. L. (2018). Peer e-tutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1190296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieminski, S., Messenger, J., & Murphy, S. (2016). Case study: What supports students to improve their grades? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1188691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, Ed.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar