Equity, diversity, and inclusion in open education: A systematic literature review

References

• References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the review.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, N. (Ed.). (2022). Enhancing inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility (IDEA) in open educational resources (OER). University of Southern Queensland. https://usq.pressbooks.pub/diversityandinclusionforoer/
   Google Scholar
• *Bossu, C., Bull, D., & Brown, M. (2012). Opening up Down Under: The role of open educational resources in promoting social inclusion in Australia. Distance Education, 33(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossu, C., & Ellis, D. (2023). Open educational practice as an enabler for virtual universities. In M. D. Sankey, H. Huijser, & R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning and the virtual university: University development and administration (pp. 1–13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9438-8_21-1
   Google Scholar
• Bossu, C., Iniesto, F., Vladimirschi, V., Jordan, K., & Pete, J. (2023). GO-GN guidelines for equity diversity and inclusion in open education with a focus on Africa and Latin America. Global OER Graduate Network. https://go-gn.net/gogn_outputs/edi-guidelines/
   Google Scholar
• *Bossu, C., Pete, J., Prinsloo, P., & Agbu, J. F. (2019, September 9–12). How to tame a dragon: Scoping diversity, inclusion and equity in the context of an OER project [Paper presentation]. Ninth Pan-Commonwealth Forum (PCF9) on Open Learning, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. https://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/3349
   Google Scholar
• *Brown, M., & Croft, B. (2020). Social annotation and an inclusive praxis for open pedagogy in the college classroom. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cachia, R., Aldaoud, M., Eldeib, A. M., Hiari, O., Tweissi, A., Onrubia, D. V., Wimpenny, K., & Maya-Jariego, I. (2020). Cultural diversity in the adoption of open education in the Mediterranean Basin: Collectivist values and power distance in the universities of the Middle East. Araucaria: Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política, Humanidades y Relaciones Internacionales, 22(44), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2020.i44.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. (2021). Equity education initiatives within Canadian universities: Promise and limits. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 25(2), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2019.1631226
   Google Scholar
• *Cox, G., Masuku, B., & Willmers, M. (2020). Open textbooks and social justice: Open educational practices to address economic, cultural and political injustice at the University of Cape Town. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• *Croft, B., & Brown, M. (2020). Inclusive open education: Presumptions, principles, and practices. Distance Education, 41(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in open educational practices. Open Praxis, 10(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasli, M. (2019). UNESCO guidelines on intercultural education: A deconstructive reading. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 27(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2018.1451913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewidar, O., Elmestekawy, N., & Welch, V. (2022). Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00123-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• dos Santos, A. I., Punie, Y., & Muñoz, J. C. (2016). Opening up education: A support framework for higher education institutions. Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC101436
   Google Scholar
• Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 8–33). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, M. A., Zelaya, D. G., & Madsen, J. W. (2021). Rethinking the course syllabus: Considerations for promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion. Teaching of Psychology, 48(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Funes, M., & Mackness, J. (2018). When inclusion excludes: a counter narrative of open online education. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1444638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, A. (2019). [Review of the book Open education: International perspectives in higher education, by P. Blessinger & T. J. Bliss]. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34(3), 290–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1577728
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An overview of content analysis. The Marketing Review, 3(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
   Google Scholar
• *Hockings, C., Brett, P., & Terentjevs, M. (2012). Making a difference—inclusive learning and teaching in higher education through open educational resources. Distance Education, 33(2), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Paskevicius, M. (2012). The role of postgraduate students in co-authoring open educational resources to promote social inclusion: A case study at the University of Cape Town. Distance Education, 33(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniesto, F., Rodrigo, C., & Hillaire, G. (2023). A case study to explore a UDL evaluation framework based on MOOCs. Applied Sciences, 13(1), Article 13010476. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010476
   Google Scholar
• *Iniesto, F., Tabuenca, B., Rodrigo, C., & Tovar, E. (2021). Challenges to achieving a more inclusive and sustainable open education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, R., & Bossu, C. (2014). Conversations from south of the equator: Challenges and opportunities in OER across Broader Oceania. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 11(3), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i3.2220
   Google Scholar
• *Kalir, J. H. (2018). Equity-oriented design in open education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2018-0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2007). Reconsidering open and distance learning in the developing world: Meeting students’ learning needs. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Konow, J., Saijo, T., & Akai, K. (2020). Equity versus equality: Spectators, stakeholders and groups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 77, Article 102171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koseoglu, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2018). An exploratory literature review on open educational practices. Distance Education, 39(4), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (dis)course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290
   Google Scholar
• *Lapum, J., Bailey, A., St-Amant, O., Garmaise-Yee, J., Hughes, M., & Mistry, S. (2022). Equity, diversity, and inclusion in open educational resources: An interpretive description of students' perspectives. Nurse Education Today, 116, Article 105459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina-García, M., Doña-Toledo, L., & Higueras-Rodríguez, L. (2020). Equal opportunities in an inclusive and sustainable education system: An explanatory model. Sustainability, 12(11), Article 4626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, R., Peñafiel, M., Tenemaza, M., & Luján-Mora, S. (2019). Towards an accessible UX for people with disabilities in open educational resources websites. In T. Ahram & C. Falcão (Eds.), Advances in intelligent systems and computing: Vol. 972. Advances in usability and user experience (pp. 58–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_7
   Google Scholar
• *Nusbaum, A. T., Cuttler, C., & Swindell, S. (2020). Open educational resources as a tool for educational equity: Evidence from an introductory psychology class. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00152
   Google Scholar
• Olcott, D., Jr. (2012). OER perspectives: emerging issues for universities. Distance Education, 33(2), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.700561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pautasso, M. (2019). The structure and conduct of a narrative literature review. In M. Shoja, A. Arynchyna, M. Loukas, A. V. D’Antoni, S. M. Buerger, M. Karl, & R. S. Tubbs (Eds.), A guide to the scientific career: Virtues, communication, research and academic writing (pp. 299–310). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118907283.ch31
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A. H., Agosto, D., Greenberg, J., Lin, X., & Yan, E. (2021). Where do we stand? Diversity, equity, inclusion, and social justice in North American library and information science education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(3), 258–286. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis.2020-0018
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. (2019, May 17). Interactive session: Equity, diversity, and inclusion in open education [Paper presentation]. Oregon Statewide OER Summit, Lane Community College in Eugene, OR, United States of America. https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/39269
   Google Scholar
• *Veletsianos, G. (2021). Open educational resources: expanding equity or reflecting and furthering inequities? Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09840-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villegas, T. (2017, July 11). Inclusion, exclusion, segregation, and integration: How are they different? Think Inclusive. https://www.thinkinclusive.us/post/inclusion-exclusion-segregation-and-integration-how-are-they-different
   Google Scholar
• Wedemeyer, C. A. (1981). Learning at the back door: Reflections on non-traditional learning in the lifespan. The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open educational resources: A review of the literature. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 781–789). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_63
   Google Scholar
• *Willems, J., & Bossu, C. (2012). Equity considerations for open educational resources in the glocalization of education. Distance Education, 33(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, N., & Anastasi, K. (2018). More than free: Equity in open educational resources. CUNY Academic Works. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/bx_oers/22/
   Google Scholar
• Yuchi, Z., & Zhujun, J. (2019). Bridging the gap: ICT and OER for equitable and quality rural education in China. In Dialogue on ICT and Education Innovation –Towards Sustainable Development Goal for Education (SDG 4)—Proceedings of the Ministerial Forum (pp. 175–184). UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Unesco_003_Proccedings_COLOR-2.pdf#page=177
   Google Scholar