Pareto efficiency as alternative to Nash equilibrium in competitive discrete location under delivered pricing

References

• Andree, K., Heywood, J. S., Schwan, M., & Wang, Z. (2018). A spatial model of cartel stability: The influence of production cost convexity. Bulletin of Economic Research, 70(3), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Aspremont, C., Gabszewicz, J. J., & Thisse, J.-F. (1979). On hotelling’s stability in competition. Econometrica, 47(5), 1145–1150. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Palma, A., Ginsburgh, V., & Thisse, J. F. (1987). On existence of location equilibria in the 3-firm Hotelling problem. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Bañez, J. M., Heredia, M., Pelegrín, B., Pérez-Lantero, P., & Ventura, I. (2011). Finding all pure strategy Nash Equilibria in a planar location game. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorta-González, P., Santos-Peñate, D. R., & Suárez-Vega, R. (2005). Spatial competition in networks under delivered pricing. Papers Regional Science, 84, 271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichberger, J. (1993). Game theory for Economists. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, J., Salhi, S., & Toth, B. G. (2014). Location equilibria for a continuous competitive facility location problem under delivered pricing. Computers & Operations Research, 41, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FICO Xpress Mosel. (2021). Fair Isaac Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz, J. J., & Thisse, J. F. (1992). Location. In R. Aumann & S. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of game theory with economic applications (pp. 281–304). Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• García, M. D., Pelegrín, B., & Fernández, P. (2011). Location strategy for a firm under competitive delivered prices. The Annals of Regional Science, 47(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0372-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, B. (1994). Competitive spatial price discrimination with strictly convex production costs. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)02035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, B., & Venkatu, G. (2002). Tacit collusion in a spatial model with delivered pricing. Journal of Economics, 76(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s712-002-8220-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. H., Thisse, J. F., & Weskamp, A. (1989). Spatial discrimination, Bertrand vs. Cournot in a model of location choice. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(89)90035-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, E. M. (1937). Spatial price discrimination. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(3), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967453
   Google Scholar
• Huck, S., Knoblauch, V., & Muller, W. (2003). On the profitability of collusion in location games. Journal of Urban Economics, 54(3), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00076-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkenny, M., & Thisse, J. F. (1999). Economics of location: A selective survey. Computers & Operations Research, 26(14), 1369–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer, P. J., & Hurter, A. P. (1986). Competition of chains, discriminatory pricing and location. Econometrica, 54(3), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer, P. J., & Thisse, J. F. (1990). Competitive location on networks under delivered pricing. Operations Research Letters, 9(3), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(90)90012-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T., & Matsushima, N. (2005). Cartel stability in a delivered pricing oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 86(3), 259–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-005-0150-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwemezi, J. J., & Huang, Y. (2011). Optimal facility location on spherical surfaces: Algorithm and application. New York Science Journal, 4, 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nessah, R., & Parvulescu, R. (2017). On the existence of pareto efficient Nash equilibria in discontinuous games. International Game Theory Review, 19(03), 1750014–1750013. pages. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198917500141
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, M. J., & Pitchik, C. (1987). Equilibrium in hotelling’s model of spatial competition. Econometrica, 55(4), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, M. J., & Rubinstein, A. (1990). Bargaining and markets. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, C. (2009). Location choice under delivered pricing: A reinterpretation. The Annals of Regional Science, 43, 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelegrín, B., Dorta, P., & Fernández, P. (2011). Finding location equilibria for competing firms under delivered pricing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 729–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelegrín, B., Fernández, P., & García, M. D. (2017). Nash equilibria in network facility location under delivered pricing. In: Mazolli L., D’Amato E. and Pardalos P.M. (eds.) Spatial Interaction Models. (pp. 273–292) Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pelegrín, M., & Pelegrín, B. (2017). Nash equilibria in location games on a network. Or Spectrum, 39(3), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-017-0472-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phlips, L. (1983). The Economics of Price Discrimination. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plastria, F. (2002). Formulating logical implications in combinatorial optimisation. European Journal of Operational Research, 140(2), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00073-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalzo, V. (2010). Pareto efficient Nash equilibrium in discontinuous games. Economics Letters, 107(3), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalzo, V. (2012). Discontinuous stable games and efficient Nash equilibria. Economics Letters, 115(3), 387–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardos, E., & Wexler, T. (2007). Network formation games and the potential function method. In Algorithmic game theory (pp. 487–516). Univ. Press Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Thisse, J. F., & Vives, X. (1988). On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. The American Economic Review, 78, 122–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, G. (2015). On the existence of equilibria in games with arbitrary strategy spaces and preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 60, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar