Solving multi-attribute decision making problems with incomplete weights: A dual approach

References

• Ahn, B. S. (2006). Multiattribute decision aid with extended ISMAUT. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Part A), 36, 507–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, B. S. (2015). Extreme point-based multi-attribute decision analysis with incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 748–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, B. S. (2017). Approximate weighting method for multiattribute decision problems with imprecise parameters. Omega, 72, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriosopoulos, D., Doumpos, M., Pardalos, P. M., & Zopounidis, C. (2019). Computational approaches and data analytics in financial services: A literature review. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(10), 1581–1599. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1595193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanassopoulos, A. D., & Podinovski, V. V. (1997). Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapat, R. B., & Raghavan, T. E. S. (1997). Nonnegative matrices and applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, F. H., & Barret, B. E. (1996). Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Science, 42(11), 1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.11.1515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcherding, K., & von Winterfeldt, D. (1988). The effect of varying value trees on multiattribute evaluations. Acta Psychologica, 68(1–3), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(88)90052-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrizosa, E., Conde, E., Fernandez, F. R., & Puerto, J. (1995). Multi-criteria analysis with partial information about the weighting coefficients. European Journal of Operational Research, 81(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0270-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, M. N. A., Lootsma, F. A., & Vogt, F. J. (1991). An elementary proof of Paelinck’s theorem on the convex hull of ranked criterion weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 52(2), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90086-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis. Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2004). A multicriteria classification approach based on pairwise comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(2), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W., & Barron, F. H. (1994). SMART and SMARTER: Improved simple method for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. W. (1995). Range sensitivity of attribute weights in multiattribute value models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. R. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Han, C. H., & Ahn, B. S. (2005). Interactive group decision-making procedure using weak strength of preference. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(10), 1204–1212. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., Brinberg, D., & Ackerman, L. J. (1986). Assessing attribute importance: A comparison of six methods. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 463–468. https://doi.org/10.1086/208530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., & Siskos, J. (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 10(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(82)90155-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., & Siskos, Y. (2001). Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00035-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, A. (2011). Using imprecise estimates for weights. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(6), 1048–1055. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasakal, E., Eryilmaz, U., & Karasakal, O. (2022). Ranking using PROMETHEE when weights and thresholds are imprecise: A data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(9), 1978–1995. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1963195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H., & Ahn, B. S. (1999). Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(3), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00040-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, C. W., & Sarin, R. K. (1985). Ranking with partial information: A method and an application. Operations Research, 33(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.33.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmietowicz, Z. W., & Pearman, A. D. (1984). Decision theory, linear partial information and statistical dominance. Omega, 12(4), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(84)90075-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofler, E., Kmietowicz, Z. W., & Pearman, A. D. (1984). Decision making with linear partial information (L.P.I.). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(12), 1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.2307/2582095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahdelma, R., & Salminen, P. (2001). SMAA-2: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research, 49(3), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.3.444.11220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malakooti, B. (2000). Ranking and screening multiple criteria alternatives with partial information and use of ordinal and cardinal strength of preference. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mármol, A. M., Puerto, J., & Fernandez, F. R. (1998). The use of partial information on weights in multicriteria decision problems. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 7(6), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199811)7:6<322::AID-MCDA203>3.0.CO;2-4
   Google Scholar
• Mármol, A. M., Puerto, J., & Fernandez, F. R. (2002). Sequential incorporation of imprecise information in multiple-criteria decision processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 137(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00082-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos, A., Ríos-Insua, S., & Jiménez, A. (2007). Dominance, potential optimality and alternative ranking in imprecise multi-attribute decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K. S., & Kim, S. H. (1997). Tools for interactive multiattribute decisionmaking with incompletely identified information. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00121-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearman, A. D., & Kmietowicz, Z. W. (1986). Stochastic dominance with linear partial information. European Journal of Operational Research, 23(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90214-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelissari, R., Oliveira, M. C., Amor, S. B., Kandakoglu, A., & Helleno, A. L. (2020). SMAA methods and their applications: A literature review and future research directions. Annals of Operations Research, 293(2), 433–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03151-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puerto, J., Marmol, A. M., Monroy, L., & Fernandez, F. R. (2000). Decision criteria with partial information. International Transactions in Operational Research, 7(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2000.tb00184.x
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, F., & Ryan, C. (1992). Client perceptions of hotels: A multi-attribute approach. Tourism Management, 13(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(92)90058-F
   Google Scholar
• Salo, A. A., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (1992). Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements. Operations Research, 40(6), 1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.40.6.1053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo, A. A., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (2001). Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME) – Elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 31(6), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.983411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solymosi, T., & Dombi, J. (1986). A method for determining the weights of criteria: The centralized weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 26(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90157-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, T. J. (1996). Robustness of additive value function methods in MCDM. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5(4), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199612)5:4<301::AID-MCDA120>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Z. P., Nie, R. X., & Wang, J. Q. (2020). Probabilistic linguistic multi-criteria decision-making based on evidential reasoning and combined ranking methods considering decision-maker’s psychological preferences. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(5), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1632752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatankhah, S., Darvishmotevali, M., Rahimi, R., Jamali, S. M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2023). Assessing the application of multi-criteria decision making techniques in hospitality and tourism research: A bibliometric study. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2022-0643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1987). Decision making with imprecise information. European Journal of Operational Research, 28(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90168-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Liao, H. (2023). An evidential reasoning-based stochastic multi-attribute acceptability analysis method for uncertain and heterogeneous multi-attribute reverse auction. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74(1), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2035271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar