Some notes on non-reciprocal matrices in the multiplicative pairwise comparisons framework

References

• Andres, R. d A., Cascon, J. M., & Gonzalez-Arteaga, T. (2020). Preferences stability: A measure of preferences changes over time. Decision Support Systems, 129, 113169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bana, C. A., De Corte, J. M., & Vansnick, J. C. (2005). On the Mathematical Foundation of MACBETH. In: Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Vol. 78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-510
   Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P., & Vincke, P. (1985). A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science, 31(6), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli, M. (2017). Studying a set of properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons. Annals of Operations Research, 248(1-2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2166-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli, M. (2018). A survey of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons. International Journal of General Systems, 47(8), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2018.1523156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli, M., & Fedrizzi, M. (2015). Axiomatic properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, N. (1995). A goal programming method for generating priority vectors. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(5), 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1995.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Balteiro, L., González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2009). Forest management with multiple criteria and multiple stakeholders: An application to two public forests in Spain. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 24(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802687440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, E., & González-Pachón, J. (2003). Consistency-driven approximation of a pairwise comparison matrix. Kybernetika, 39(5), 561–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fülöp, J., & Markovits-Somogyi, R. (2012). Ranking decision making units based on DEA-like nonreciprocal pairwise comparisons. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 9(2), 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fülöp, J., Koczkodaj, W. W., & Szarek, S. J. (2012). On some convexity properties of the Least Squares Method for pairwise comparisons matrices without the reciprocity condition. Journal of Global Optimization, 54(4), 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-011-9785-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, B., & Wang, Q. (1989). An alternate measure of consistency. In: B. Golden, E. Wasil, & P. T. Harker (Eds.), The analytic hierarchy process, Applications and studies. Springer-Verlag. 68–81.
   Google Scholar
• González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2004). A method for dealing with inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(2), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2007). Inferring consensus weights from pairwise comparison matrices without suitable properties. Annals of Operations Research, 154(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0182-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Pachón, J., Rodríguez-Galiano, M., & Romero, C. (2003). Transitive approximation to pairwise comparison matrices by using interval goal programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(5), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016). ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzybowski, A. Z. (2012). Note on a new optimization based approach for estimating priority weights and related consistency index. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(14), 11699–11708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker, P. T., & Vargas, L. G. (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 33(11), 1383–1403. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovanov, N. V., Kolari, J. W., & Sokolov, M. V. (2008). Deriving weights from general pairwise comparison matrices. Mathematical Social Sciences, 55(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2007.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karapetrovic, E. S., & Rosenbloom, A. (1999). A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 119(3), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00334-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koczkodaj, W. W., & Orłowski, M. (1999). Computing a consistent approximation to a generalized pairwise comparisons matrix. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 37(3), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00048-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koczkodaj, W. W., & Szwarc, R. (2014). On axiomatization of inconsistency indicators for pairwise comparisons. Fundamenta Informaticae, 132(4), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2014-1055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koczkodaj, W. W., & Urban, R. (2018). Axiomatization of inconsistency indicators for pairwise comparisons. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 94, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivulin, N. (2016). Using tropical optimization techniques to evaluate alternatives via pairwise comparisons. In: Proceedings of the SIAM Workshop on Combinatorial Scientific Computing (CSC). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974690.ch7
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C., Kou, G., & Ergu, D. (2014). A statistical approach to measure the consistency level of the pairwise comparison matrix. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(9), 1380–1386. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linares, P., Lumbreras, S., Santamaria, A., & Veiga, A. (2016). How relevant is the lack of reciprocity in pairwise comparisons? An experiment with AHP. Annals of Operations Research, 245(1-2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1767-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Liu, T., & Hu, Y. K. (2022a). Reaching consensus in group decision making with non-reciprocal pairwise comparison matrices. Applied Intelligence, 53(10), 12888–12907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04136-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Qiu, M. -Y., & Zhang, W. -G. (2021a). An uncertainty-induced axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process and its implication. Expert Systems with Applications, 183, 115427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Yang, H., & Hu, Y.-K. (2022b). A prioritization approach of non-reciprocal fuzzy preference relations and its extension. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 168, 108076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., You, Q.-R., Hu, Y.-. K., & Zhang, W.-G. (2021c). The breaking of additively reciprocal property of fuzzy preference relations and its implication to decision making under uncertainty. Information Sciences, 580, 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.08.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Guo, Z., Li, Y., Zhu, L., & Yuan, C. (2021b). An improved failure risk assessment method for bilge system of the large luxury cruise ship under fire accident conditions. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(9), 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9090957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits-Somogyi, R., & Bokor, Z. (2014). Assessing the logistics efficiency of European countries by using the DEA-PC methodology. TRANSPORT, 29(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2014.928787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazurek, J. (2018). Some notes on the properties of inconsistency indices in pairwise comparisons. Operations Research and Decisions, 1, 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Nishizawa, K. (2019a). Mutual evaluation and solution method. In: I. Czarnowski, R. Howlett, & I., Jain (Eds.), Intelligent decision technologies 2019. Smart innovation, systems and technologies (Vol. 143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8303-8_20
   Google Scholar
• Nishizawa, K. (2019b). Non-reciprocal pairwise comparisons and solution method in AHP. In: I. Czarnowski, R. Howlett, L. Jain, & L. Vlacic (Eds.), Intelligent decision technologies 2018, KES-IDT 2018, Smart innovation, systems and technologies (Vol. 97). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92028-3_16
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE). Revue Française D'informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle, 2(8), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/196802V100571
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). Analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundations of the analytic hierarch process. Management Science, 32(7), 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process – What is it and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making. RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
   Google Scholar
• Sekitani, K., & Yamaki, N. (1999). A logical interpretation for the eigenvalue method in AHP. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 42(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.42.219
   Google Scholar
• Starczewski, T. (2017). Remarks on the impact of the adopted scale on the priority estimation quality. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computational Mechanics, 16(3), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.17512/jamcm.2017.3.10
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgments. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070288
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39(10), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas, L. G. (2008). The consistency index in reciprocal matrices: Comparison of deterministic and statistical approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 191(2), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z.-J., & Deng, S. (2022). Note on ‘The breaking of additively reciprocal property of fuzzy preference relations and its implication to decision making under uncertainty’. Information Sciences, 616, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z.-J., & Deng, S. (2023). Comments on ‘An uncertainty-induced axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process and its implication’. Expert Systems with Applications, 224, 119914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X. (2022). Comments on ‘A prioritization approach of non-reciprocal fuzzy preference relations and its extension’ – Technical note. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 171, 108449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108449
   Google Scholar