An integrated model for occupational health and safety risk assessment based on probabilistic linguistic information and social network consensus analysis

References

• Ak, M. F., Yucesan, M., & Gul, M. (2022). Occupational health, safety and environmental risk assessment in textile production industry through a Bayesian BWM-VIKOR approach. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36(2), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02069-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyildiz, E. (2022). A novel pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology for e-scooter charging station location-selection. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 111, 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalış Boyacı, A., & Selim, A. (2022). Assessment of occupational health and safety risks in a Turkish public hospital using a two-stage hesitant fuzzy linguistic approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(24), 36313–36325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18191-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, E., & Gul, M. (2021). Hazard identification, risk assessment and control for dam construction safety using an integrated BWM and MARCOS approach under interval type-2 fuzzy sets environment. Automation in Construction, 127, 103699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Gou, X. (2022). The application of probabilistic linguistic CODAS method based on new score function in multi-criteria decision-making. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 41(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01568-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q. Y., Liu, H. C., Wang, J. H., & Shi, H. (2022). New model for occupational health and safety risk assessment based on Fermatean fuzzy linguistic sets and CoCoSo approach. Applied Soft Computing, 126, 109262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko, A. P., & Liang, D. (2023). A heterogeneous opinion-driven decision-support model for tourists’ selection with different travel needs in online reviews. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74(1), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2035274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., Dhalmahapatra, K., & Maiti, J. (2020). Z-number integrated weighted VIKOR technique for hazard prioritization and its application in virtual prototype based EOT crane operations. Applied Soft Computing, 94, 106419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, R., Raheja, S., & Garg, R. K. (2022). Decision support system for optimal selection of software reliability growth models using a hybrid approach. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 71(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2021.3104232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou, X., Xiao, P., Huang, D., & Deng, F. (2021a). Probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic alternative queuing method for real economy development evaluation under the perspective of economic financialization. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 3225–3244. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1870520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou, X., Xu, Z., Liao, H., & Herrera, F. (2021). Probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic term set and its use in designing an improved VIKOR method: The application in smart healthcare. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(12), 2611–2630. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1806741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou, X., Xu, Z., Zhou, W., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2021b). The risk assessment of construction project investment based on prospect theory with linguistic preference orderings. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 709–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1868324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, M. (2018). A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24(7), 1723–1760. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1424531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, M., & Ak, M. F. (2020). Assessment of occupational risks from human health and environmental perspectives: A new integrated approach and its application using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy MAIRCA. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 34(8), 1231–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01816-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, M., Ak, M. F., & Guneri, A. F. (2017). Occupational health and safety risk assessment in hospitals: A case study using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 23(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2016.1234363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, M., & Celik, E. (2018). Fuzzy rule-based Fine–Kinney risk assessment approach for rail transportation systems. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24(7), 1786–1812. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1422975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, M., & Guneri, A. F. (2016). A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: A case study for aluminum industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 40, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, M., Lo, H. W., & Yucesan, M. (2021). Fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for occupational risk assessment in manufacturing. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(5), 2635–2653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00417-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, M., Yucesan, M., & Ak, M. F. (2022). Control measure prioritization in Fine- Kinney-based risk assessment: A Bayesian BWM-Fuzzy VIKOR combined approach in an oil station. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(39), 59385–59402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19454-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, S. S., Wang, Y. T., Peng, J. J., & Wang, J. Q. (2022). Risk ranking of wind turbine systems through an improved FMEA based on probabilistic linguistic information and the TODIM method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(3), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1854629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Liu, H. C., Duan, C. Y., & Song, M. S. (2022). An improved reliability model for FMEA using probabilistic linguistic term sets and TODIM method. Annals of Operations Research, 312(1), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03447-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamustafa, M., & Cebi, S. (2021). Extension of safety and critical effect analysis to neutrosophic sets for the evaluation of occupational risks. Applied Soft Computing, 110, 107719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2018). Simultaneous evaluation of criteria and alternatives (SECA) for multi-criteria decision-making. Informatica, 29(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2018.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(3), 25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Fata, C. M., Giallanza, A., Micale, R., & La Scalia, G. (2021). Ranking of occupational health and safety risks by a multi-criteria perspective: Inclusion of human factors and application of VIKOR. Safety Science, 138, 105234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Chen, Q., Li, X., & Gou, X. (2021). An improved PL-VIKOR model for risk evaluation of technological innovation projects with probabilistic linguistic term sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 23(2), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00971-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., Xu, Y., Liu, X., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2023). A trust risk dynamic management mechanism based on third-party monitoring for the conflict-eliminating process of social network group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 53(6), 3399–3413. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2022.3159866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, D., Li, F., & Xu, Z. (2023). A group-based FMEA approach with dynamic heterogeneous social network consensus reaching model for uncertain reliability assessment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.2020694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., Liu, R., Gu, X., & Yang, M. (2023a). From total quality management to Quality 4.0: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0243-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C. (2016). FMEA using Uncertainty Theories and MCDM Methods. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Li, Y., Zhang, X., & Pedrycz, W. (2023b). A multiattribute group decision-making method with probabilistic linguistic information based on an adaptive consensus reaching model and evidential reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 53(3), 1905–1919. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2022.3165030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Zhang, K., Wang, P., & Wang, F. (2022). A clustering-and maximum consensus-based model for social network large-scale group decision making with linguistic distribution. Information Sciences, 602, 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R., Hou, L. X., Liu, H. C., & Lin, W. (2020a). Occupational health and safety risk assessment using an integrated SWARA-MABAC model under bipolar fuzzy environment. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 39(4), 276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01311-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R., Liu, Z., Liu, H. C., & Shi, H. (2021a). An improved alternative queuing method for occupational health and safety risk assessment and its application to construction excavation. Automation in Construction, 126, 103672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R., Mou, X., & Liu, H. C. (2020b). Occupational health and safety risk assessment based on combination weighting and uncertain linguistic information: Method development and application to a construction project. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 8(4), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.1875519
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, R., Zhu, Y. J., Chen, Y., & Liu, H. C. (2021b). Occupational health and safety risk assessment using an integrated TODIM-PROMETHEE model under linguistic spherical fuzzy environment. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(11), 6814–6836. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mete, S., Serin, F., Oz, N. E., & Gul, M. (2019). A decision-support system based on Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR for occupational risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline construction. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 71, 102979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2019.102979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohandes, S. R., & Zhang, X. (2021). Developing a holistic occupational health and safety risk assessment model: An application to a case of sustainable construction project. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, R. X., Tian, Z. P., Kwai Sang, C., & Wang, J. Q. (2022). Implementing healthcare service quality enhancement using a cloud-support QFD model integrated with TODIM method and linguistic distribution assessments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(2), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1824554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 369, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raheja, S., Obaidat, M. S., Kumar, M., Sadoun, B., & Bhushan, S. (2022). A hybrid MCDM framework and simulation analysis for the assessment of worst polluted cities. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 118, 102540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., & Mishra, D. K. (2021). An analysis of thematic structure of research trends in occupational health and safety concerning safety culture and environmental management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, Y., Ding, R., & Wang, H. (2020). A novel approach for occupational health and safety and environment risk assessment for nuclear power plant construction project. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, M., Liao, H., & Kou, G. (2022). Type α and type γ consensus for multi-stage emergency group decision making based on mining consensus sequences. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1830724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepe, S., & Kaya, İ. (2020). A fuzzy-based risk assessment model for evaluations of hazards with a real-case study. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 26(2), 512–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1521262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ünal, Ö., Akbolat, M., Amarat, M., & Tilkilioğlu, S. (2021). The role of the human factor in occupational safety and health performance. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics : JOSE, 27(1), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1554932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valipour, M., Yousefi, S., Jahangoshai Rezaee, M., & Saberi, M. (2022). A clustering-based approach for prioritizing health, safety and environment risks integrating fuzzy C-means and hybrid decision-making methods. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36(3), 919–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02045-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Liao, H., & Xu, Z. (2022). Order relations and operations on the set of probabilistic linguistic term sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(5), 1475–1485. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3062294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., Wang, X., Zhang, B., & Zhang, H. (2022). Consensus-driven methodology to managing diversity and complex linguistic ratings in quality function deployment: An optimization-based approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society2. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2129482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. S. (2004). Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. Information Sciences, 168(1-4), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., Xu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2022). The DEMATEL-COPRAS hybrid method under probabilistic linguistic environment and its application in third party logistics provider selection. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 21(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09358-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, M., Kou, G., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Bounded confidence evolution of opinions and actions in social networks. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(7), 7017–7028. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3043635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Xiao, J., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2021). Consensus and -based failure mode and effect analysis approach for reliability management in social network and uncertainty contexts. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 208, 107425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Mohandes, S. R. (2020). Occupational health and safety in green building construction projects: A holistic Z-numbers-based risk management framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., Shen, X., Liao, H., & Cai, M. (2022). Selecting products through text reviews: An MCDM method incorporating personalized heuristic judgments in the prospect theory. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 21(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09359-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar