165
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Optimization consensus analysis for group decision making in view of non-transferable and transferable allocation schemes

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1325-1342 | Received 13 Dec 2022, Accepted 26 May 2023, Published online: 02 Aug 2023

References

  • Ben-Arieh, D., & Easton, T. (2007). Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decision Support Systems, 43(3), 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.009
  • Ben-Arieh, D., Easton, T., & Evans, B. (2009). Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 39(1), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2008.2006373
  • Black, D. (1948). On the rationale of group decision making. Journal of Political Economy, 56(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/256633
  • Chao, X. R., Dong, Y. C., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). How to determine the consensus threshold in group decision making: A method based on efficiency benchmark using benefit and cost insight. Annals of Operations Research, 316(1), 143–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03927-8
  • Chao, X. R., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Herrera Viedma, E. (2021a). Large-scale group decision-making with non-cooperative behaviors and heterogeneous preferences: An application in financial inclusion. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(1), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.047
  • Chao, X. R., Kou, G., Peng, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2021b). An efficient consensus reaching framework for large-scale social network group decision making and its application in urban resettlement. Information Sciences, 575, 499–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.047
  • Cheng, D., Yuan, Y., Wu, Y., Hao, T., & Cheng, F. (2022). Maximum satisfaction consensus with budget constraints considering individual tolerance and compromise limit behaviors. European Journal of Operational Research, 297(1), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.04.051
  • Cheng, D., Zhou, Z., Cheng, F., Zhou, Y., & Yujing, X. (2018). Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(3), 1122–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.041
  • Del Moral, M. J., Chiclana, F., Tapia, J. M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). A comparative study on consensus measures in group decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(8), 1624–1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21954
  • Dong, Y., Xu, Y., Li, H., & Feng, B. (2010). The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.013
  • Dong, Y., Zhang, G., Hong, W. C., & Xu, Y. (2010). Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decision Support Systems, 49(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.03.003
  • Gao, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Consensus reaching with non-cooperative behavior management for personalized individual semantics-based social network group decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(11), 2518–2535. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1997654
  • Gong, Z., Guo, W., & Słowiński, R. (2021). Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction. Omega, 104, 102491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2021.102491
  • Gong, Z., Xu, X., Guo, W., Enrique, H.-V., & Cabrerizo, F. J. (2021). Minimum cost consensus modelling under various linear uncertain-constrained scenarios-ScienceDirect. Information Fusion, 66, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.015
  • Gong, Z., Zhang, H., Forrest, J., Li, L., & Xu, X. (2015). Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.035
  • Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2007). A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15(5), 863–877. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.889952
  • Hwang, C. L., & Lin, M. J. (1988). Group decision making under multiple criteria – Methods and applications (Vol. 281). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90267-6
  • Kalai, E. (1977). Nonsymmetric Nash solutions and replications of 2-person bargaining. International Journal of Game Theory, 6(3), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01774658
  • Knutson, T. J. (1972). An experimental study of the effects of orientation behavior on small group consensus. Speech Monographs, 39(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757209375753
  • Kou, G., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Inventive problem-solving map of innovative carbon emission strategies for solar energy-based transportation investment projects. Applied Energy, 311, 118680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118680
  • Labella, Á., Liu, H., Rodríguez, R. M., & Martínez, L. (2020). A cost consensus metric for consensus reaching processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model. European Journal of Operational Research, 281(2), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.030
  • Li, C. C., Dong, Y., Pedrycz, W., & Herrera, F. (2022b). Integrating continual personalized individual semantics learning in consensus reaching in linguistic group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(3), 1525–1536. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.3031086
  • Li, Y. H., Kou, G., Li, G. X., & Peng, Y. (2022a). Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network. European Journal of Operational Research, 303(2), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.040
  • Li, G. X., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). Heterogeneous large-scale group decision making using fuzzy cluster analysis and its application to emergency response plan selection. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(6), 3391–3403. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2021.3068759
  • Li, X. F., & Liao, H. C. (2023). A consensus model for large scale group decision making based on empathetic network analysis and its application in strategical selection of COVID-19 vaccines. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74(2), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2064782
  • Long, J., Liang, H., Gao, L., Guo, Z., & Dong, Y. (2021). Consensus reaching with two-stage minimum adjustments in multi-attribute group decision making: A method based on preference-approval structure and prospect theory. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 158(10), 107349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107349
  • Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907266
  • Panda, S., Modak, N. M., Basu, M., Goyal, S. K., Economics, I. J. P., & Grubbstrm, R. W. (2015). Channel coordination and profit distribution in a social responsible three-layer supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.001
  • Qu, S., Li, Y., & Ji, Y. (2021). The mixed integer robust maximum expert consensus models for large-scale GDM under uncertainty circumstances. Applied Soft Computing, 107, 107369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107369
  • Rachmilevitch, S. (2014). Fairness, efficiency, and the Nash bargaining solution. https://econpapers.repec.org/ paper/hafhuedwp/wp201110.htm
  • Tang, M., Liao, H. C., & Kou, G. (2022). Type α and type β consensus for multi-stage emergency group decision making based on mining consensus sequences. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1830724
  • Weston, S. B., & English, H. B. (1926). The influence of the group on psychological test scores. The American Journal of Psychology, 37(4), 600–601. https://doi.org/10.2307/1414922
  • Wu, Z., Yuan, R., & Tu, J. (2021). Group decision making with transitive preferences under ordinal and cardinal consistencies: An optimization approach. Group Decision and Negotiation, 30(1), 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09714-x
  • Xiao, J., Wang, X. L., & Zhang, H. J. (2022a). Exploring the ordinal classifications of failure modes in the reliability management: An optimization-based consensus model with bounded confidences. Group Decision and Negotiation, 31(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09756-9
  • Xiao, J., Wang, X. L., Zhang, B. W., & Zhang, H. J. (2022b). Consensus driven methodology to managing diversity and complex linguistic ratings in quality function deployment: An optimization-based approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2129482
  • Xiao, H., Zhang, Y., Kou, G., Zhang, S., & Branke, J. (2023). Ranking and selection for pairwise comparison. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 70(3), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22093
  • Xu, Y., & Wu, N. (2019). A two-stage consensus reaching model for group decision making with reciprocal fuzzy preference relations. Soft Computing, 23(17), 8057–8073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3442-0
  • Zha, Q., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Consensus reaching in multiple attribute group decision making: A multi-stage optimization feedback mechanism with individual bounded confidences. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(8), 3333–3346. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3113571
  • Zha, Q., Dong, Y., Zhang, H., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2021). A personalized feedback mechanism based on bounded confidence learning to support consensus reaching in group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(6), 3900–3910. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2019.2945922
  • Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Chiclan, F., & Yu, S. (2019). Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(2), 580–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.052
  • Zhang, B., Dong, Y., & Xu, Y. (2013). Maximum expert consensus models with linear cost function and aggregation operators. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(1), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.06.001
  • Zhang, B., Dong, Y., & Xu, Y. (2014). Multiple attribute consensus rules with minimum adjustments to support consensus reaching. Knowledge-Based Systems, 67, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.06.010
  • Zhang, G., Dong, Y., & Xu, Y. (2012). Linear optimization modeling of consistency issues in group decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2415–2420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.090
  • Zhang, G., Dong, Y., Xu, Y., & Li, H. (2011). Minimum-cost consensus models under aggregation operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 41(6), 1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2113336
  • Zhang, B., Dong, Y., Zhang, H., & Pedrycz, W. (2020). Consensus mechanism with maximum-return modifications and minimum-cost feedback: A perspective of game theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(2), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.014
  • Zhang, X., Ge, B., Jiang, J., & Tan, Y. (2016). Consensus building in group decision making based on multiplicative consistency with incomplete reciprocal preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 106, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.05.036
  • Zhang, H. H., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2019). Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations. European Journal of Operational Research, 277(3), 964–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.009
  • Zhang, B., Liang, H., Zhang, G., & Xu, Y. (2018). Minimum deviation ordinal consensus reaching in GDM with heterogeneous preference structures. Applied Soft Computing, 67, 658–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.016
  • Zhang, H. J., Wang, F., Dong, Y. C., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Social trust-driven consensus reaching model with a minimum adjustment feedback mechanism considering assessments-modifications willingness. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(6), 2019–2031. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3073251

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.