Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria

Sanne Hugena Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information

Nynke Ankringab Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsView further author information

Joris Henricus Robbena Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsView further author information

Chiara Valtolinaa Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsView further author information

Pages 1-8 | Received 07 Feb 2023, Accepted 01 Jul 2023, Published online: 14 Sep 2023

Cite this article
https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2023.2233584
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Supplemental
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF View EPUB EPUB

References

Burton JL, Underwood J. 2007. Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet. 369(9571):1471–1480. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60376-6.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Dank G, Segev G, Moshe D, Kent MS. 2012. Follow-up study comparing necropsy rates and discrepancies between clinical and pathologic diagnoses at a veterinary teaching hospital: 2009 versus 1989 and 1999. J Small Anim Pract. 53(12):679–683. https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-MR2RRFT0-C/fulltext.pdf. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.2012.01296.x.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Fernandez-Segoviano P, Lazaro A, Esteban A, Rubio JM, Iruretagoyena JR. 1988. Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 16(7):683–685. doi:10.1097/00003246-198807000-00007.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Fröhlich S, Ryan O, Murphy N, McCauley N, Crotty T, Ryan D. 2014. Are autopsy findings still relevant to the management of critically ill patients in the modern era? Crit Care Med. 42(2):336–343. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23989180. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a275b1.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M. 1983. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med. 308(17):1000–1005. doi:10.1056/NEJM198304283081704.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kurz SD, Sido V, Herbst H, Ulm B, Salkic E, Ruschinski TM, Buschmann CT, Tsokos M. 2021. Discrepancies between clinical diagnosis and hospital autopsy: a comparative retrospective analysis of 1,112 cases. PLoS One. 16(8):e0255490. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2561074631. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255490.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Lakhdhir S, Viall A, Alloway E, Keene B, Baumgartner K, Ward J. 2020. Clinical presentation, cardiovascular findings, etiology, and outcome of myocarditis in dogs: 64 cases with presumptive antemortem diagnosis (26 confirmed postmortem) and 137 cases with postmortem diagnosis only (2004–2017). J Vet Cardiol. 30:44–56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1760273420300473. doi:10.1016/j.jvc.2020.05.003.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Molesan A, Goodman L, Ford J, Lovering SJ, Kelly K. 2019. The causes of canine myocarditis and myocardial fibrosis are elusive by targeted molecular testing: retrospective analysis and literature review. Vet Pathol. 56(5):761–777. doi:10.1177/0300985819839241.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Podbregar M, Kralj E, Čičak R, Pavlinjek A. 2011. A triad algorithm for analysing individual ante- and post-mortem findings to improve the quality of intensive care. Anaesth Intensive Care. 39(6):1086–1092. doi:10.1177/0310057X1103900617.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Rusu S, Lavis P, Domingues Salgado V, Van Craynest M-P, Creteur J, Salmon I, Brasseur A, Remmelink M. 2021. Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients. Virchows Arch. 479(2):385–392. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00428-020-03016-y. doi:10.1007/s00428-020-03016-y.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Schertenleib TI, Pospischil A, Hässig M, Kircher PR, Hilbe M. 2017. Comparison of clinical and pathological diagnoses in cats and dogs. J Comp Pathol. 156(2–3):217–234. doi:10.1016/j.jcpa.2017.01.004.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. 2003. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA. 289(21):2849–2856. doi:10.1001/jama.289.21.2849.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Tejerina E, Esteban A, Fernández-Segoviano P, María Rodríguez-Barbero J, Gordo F, Frutos-Vivar F, Aramburu J, Algaba Á, Gonzalo Salcedo García Ó, Lorente JA, et al. 2012. Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 40(3):842–846. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00003246-201203000-00019. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f64f.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Tejerina EE, Padilla R, Abril E, Frutos-Vivar F, Ballen A, Rodríguez-Barbero JM, Lorente JÁ, Esteban A. 2018. Autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time in the intensive care unit. Hum Pathol. 76:85–90. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2018.02.025.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Tokarz D, Poppenga R, Kaae J, Filigenzi M, Lowenstine LJ, Pesavento P. 2012. Amanitin toxicosis in two cats with acute hepatic and renal failure. Vet Pathol. 49(6):1032–1035. doi:10.1177/0300985811429307.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Vos JH, Borst GHA, Visser IJR, Soethout KCJ, de Haan L, Haffmans F, Hovius MPJ, Goedendorp P, de Groot MAMH, Prud’homme van Reine FH, et al. 2005. Comparison of clinical and pathological diagnoses in dogs. Vet Q. 27(1):2–10. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300997512. doi:10.1080/01652176.2005.9695181.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Winters B, Custer J, Galvagno SM, Colantuoni E, Kapoor SG, Lee H, Goode V, Robinson K, Nakhasi A, Pronovost P, et al. 2012. Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies. BMJ Qual Saf. 21(11):894–902. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000803.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zachary JF. 2022. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of disease. In Pathologic basis of veterinary disease. 7th ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; p. 16–395.
Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date