908
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter to the Editor

Individuality really matters for fish welfare

Pages 1-5 | Received 07 Mar 2023, Accepted 10 Oct 2023, Published online: 27 Oct 2023

References

  • Arechavala-López P. 2022. A guide on fish welfare in Spanish aquaculture - volume 1: concepts and generalities. Madrid, Spain: Asociación Empresarial de Acuicultura de España.
  • Arechavala-López P, Saraiva JL. 2019. Welfare of cultured and experimental fishes. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI.
  • Balcombe J. 2016. What a fish knows: the inner lives of our underwater cousins. New York: Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Bessa E, Brandão ML, Gonçalves-de-Freitas E. 2022. Integrative approach on the diversity of nesting behaviour in fishes. Fish and Fisheries. 23(3):564–583. doi: 10.1111/faf.12632.
  • Bovenkerk B, Meijboom FLB. 2013. Fish welfare in aquaculture: explicating the chain of interactions between science and ethics. J Agric Environ Ethics. 26(1):41–61. doi: 10.1007/s10806-012-9395-x.
  • Braithwaite VA, Boulcott P. 2007. Pain perception, aversion and fear in fish. Dis Aquat Organ. 75(2):131–138. doi: 10.3354/dao075131.
  • Branson JJ. 2008. Fish welfare. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Brown C. 2012. Tool use in fishes. Fish and Fisheries. 13(1):105–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00451.x.
  • Budaev S, Brown C. 2011. Personality traits and behaviour. In: Krause J, Brown C, Laland K, editors. Fish cognition and behavior. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd; p. 135–165.
  • Costa FV, Rosa LV, Quadros VA, de Abreu MS, Santos ARS, Sneddon LU, Kalueff AV, Rosemberg DB. 2022. The use of zebrafish as a non-traditional model organism in translational pain research. Curr Neuropharmacol. 20(3):476–493. doi: 10.2174/1570159X19666210311104408.
  • Csányi V, Csizmadia G, Miklosi A. 1989. Long-term memory and recognition of another species in the paradise fish. Animal Behav. 37:908–911. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(89)90134-6.
  • Duncan IJH. 2006. The changing concept of animal sentience. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 100(1–2):11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.011.
  • Dunlop R, Laming P. 2005. Mechanoreceptive and nociceptive responses in the central nervous system of goldfish (Carassius auratus) and trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Pain. 6(9):561–568. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.02.010.
  • Fryer G, Iles TD. 1972. Breeding habits. In: Fryer G, Iles TD, editors. The cichlid fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa. New Jersey: T.F.H. publications; p. 105–172.
  • Gesto M, Villarroel M, Tort L. 2020. Fish individuality, physiology and welfare. Physiol Behav. 219:112867. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112867.
  • Harrison R. 1964. Animal machines: the new factory farming industry. London, UK: Vincent Stuart Publishers.
  • Johansen IB, Höglund E, Øverli Ø. 2020. Individual variations and coping style. In: Kiessling A, van de Vis H, Flik G, Mackenzie S, editors. The welfare of fish. Berlin, Germany: Springer Cham; p. 283–301.
  • Kiessling A, van de Vis H, Flik G, Mackenzie S. 2012. Welfare of farmed fish in present and future production systems. Fish Physiol Biochem. 38(1):1–3. doi: 10.1007/s10695-011-9594-9.
  • Kohda M, Bshary R, Kubo N, Sogawa S. 2023. Cleaner fish recognize self in a mirror via self-face recognition like humans. Anthropology. 120:e2208420120.
  • Kozol RA, Abrams AJ, James DM, Buglo E, Yan Q, Dallman JE. 2016. Function over form: modeling groups of inherited neurological conditions in zebrafish. Front Mol Neurosci. 9:55. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00055.
  • Kristiansen TS, Fernö A, Pavlidis MA, van de Vis H. 2020. The welfare of fish. Berlin, Germany: Springer Cham.
  • Maximino C, de Brito TM, da Silva Batista AW, Herculano AM, Morato S, Gouveia A. 2010. Measuring anxiety in zebrafi sh: a critical review. Behav Brain Res. 214(2):157–171. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.031.
  • Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ. 2015. Extending the ‘Five Domains’ model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Anim Welf. 24(3):241–253. doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.3.241.
  • Mueller T. 2012. What is the thalamus in zebrafish? Front Neurosci. 6:64. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00064.
  • Newport C, Wallis G, Siebeck UE. 2018. Object recognition in fish: accurate discrimination across novel views of an unfamiliar object category (human faces). Animal Behaviour. 145:39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.09.002.
  • Noble C, Gismervik K, Iversen MH, Kolarevic J. 2018. Welfare indicators for farmed Atlantic salmon: tools for assessing fish welfare. Tromsø, Norway: Nofima.
  • Nordgreen J, Horsberg TE, Ranheim B, Chen ACN. 2007. Somatosensory evoked potentials in the telencephalon of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) following galvanic stimulation of the tail. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 193(12):1235–1242. doi: 10.1007/s00359-007-0283-1.
  • Pettersen JM, Bracke MBM, Midtlyng PJ, Folkedal O, Stien LH, Steffenak H, Kristiansen TS. 2014. Salmon welfare index model 2.0: an extended model for overall welfare assessment of caged Atlantic salmon, based on a review of selected welfare indicators and intended for fish health professionals. Rev Aquacult. 6(3):162–179. doi: 10.1111/raq.12039.
  • Rose JD. 2002. The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Rev Fisheries Sci. 10(1):1–38. doi: 10.1080/20026491051668.
  • Rose JD, Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Diggles BK, Sawynok W, Stevens ED, Wynne CDL. 2014. Can fish really feel pain? Fish and Fisheries. 15(1):97–133. doi: 10.1111/faf.12010.
  • Saraiva JL. 2022. Using ethology to improve farmed fish welfare and production. Brussels, Belgium: Aquaculture Advisory Council (AAC).
  • Saraiva JL, Arechavala-Lopez P, Cabrera-Álvarez MJ, Waley D. 2021. Research for ANIT Committee - particular welfare needs in animal transport: aquatic animals. Brussels, Belgium: European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies.
  • Sneddon LU. 2015. Pain in aquatic animals. J Exp Biol. 2018:967–976.
  • Sneddon LU. 2019. Evolution of nociception and pain: evidence from fish models. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 374(1785):20190290. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0290.
  • Sneddon LU, Braithwaite VA, Gentle MJ. 2003a. Do fishes have nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proc Biol Sci. 270(1520):1115–1121. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2349.
  • Sneddon LU, Braithwaite VA, Gentle MJ. 2003b. Novel object test: examining nociception and fear in the rainbow trout. J Pain. 4(8):431–440. doi: 10.1067/s1526-5900(03)00717-x.
  • Sneddon LU. 2013. Do painful sensations and fear exist in fish? Animal Suffering, from Science to Law International Symposium. October 18–19, 2012.
  • Studer BH. 2020. Fish welfare in aquaculture - Problems and approaches. Munich, Germany: International Society of Livestock Husbandry (IGN).
  • Torgerson-White L, Sánchez-Suárez W. 2022. Looking beyond the Shoal: fish welfare as an individual attribute. Animals. 12(19):2592. doi: 10.3390/ani12192592.
  • Triki Z, Bshary R. 2020. Long-term memory retention in a wild fish species Labroides dimidiatus eleven months after an aversive event. Ethology. 126(3):372–376. doi: 10.1111/eth.12978.
  • Vettese T, Franks B, Jacqet J. 2020. The great fish pain debate. Issues in Sci Technol. 36:49–53. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2023.2270653