Distylie chez Jasminum fruticans L.: hypothèse de la pollinisation optimale basée sur les variations de l'écologie intraflorale

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

• BAKER H.G. et P.D. HURD, 1968. —Intrafloral ecology. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 13, 385–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARRETT S.C.H., 1988. —The evolution, maintenance and loss of S.I. systems. In: Plant Reproductive Ecology. J. Lovett Doust et L. Lovett Doust (éd.), Oxford Univ. Press, 98–124.
   Google Scholar
• BARRETT S.C.H., 1990. —The evolution and adaptative significance of heterostyiy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 144–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARRETT S.C.H. et J.S. SHORE, 1985. —Dimorphic incompatibility in Turnera hermannioides Camb. (Turnera—ceae). Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard., 72, 259–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CASPER B. et E. CHARNOV, 1982. —Sex allocation in heterostylous plants. J. Theor. Biol., 96, 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRISTINI F., 1989. —Biologie de la reproduction de quelques populations naturelles de Jasminum fruticans L.: un nouveau cas de dlstylie. Mémoire de fin d'études. E.N.I.T.A., Dijon-Quétigny et C.N.R.S. Centre Emberger, Montpellier. 38 p. et annexes.
   Google Scholar
• DARWIN C., 1877. —The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. John Murray, Londres.
   Google Scholar
• DUMAS C., 1977. —Lipochemistry of the progamic stage of a self-incompatible species: neutral lipids and fatty acids of the secretory stigma during its glandular activity, and of the solid style, the ovary and the anther in Forsythia intermedia lab. (heterostylic species). Planta, 137, 177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GANDERS F.R., 1979. —The biology of heterostyiy. N. Z. J. Bot., 17, 607–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEGI G., 1927. —Illustrierte Flora Von Mittel-Europa. München, J.F. Lehmanns, Verlag. Band V. 3, 1567–2250, 18 pl. couleurs hors-texte.
   Google Scholar
• HEITZ B., 1980. —La pollinisation des Lins hétérostyles du groupe Linum perenne L. (Linacées). C. R. Acad. Sc., Paris, 290, 811–814.
   Google Scholar
• LEVIN D.A., 1968. —The breeding system of Lithospermum caroliniense: adaptation and counteradaptation. Am. Natur., 102, 427–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LLOYD D.G. et M.A. YATES, 1982. —Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphroditic plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution, 36, 903–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAIRONE Y. et A. GESLOT, 1987. —Etude expérimentale de la germination in vitro des semences de Jasminum fruticans L. Eco!. Médit., tome XIII, 3, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• McCLURE J.W., 1975. —Physiology and function of flavonoids. In: The Flavonoids. J.B. Harborn, T.J. Mabry et H. Mabry (éd.). Chapman et Hall, Londres, 970–1055.
   Google Scholar
• MOEWUS F., 1950. —Zur Physiologie und Biochemie der Selbststerilität bei Forsythia. Biologisches Zentralblatt, 69, 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• MUENCHOW G.E. et M. GREBUS, 1989. —The evolution of dioecy from distyly: reevaluation of the hypothesis of the loss of long-tongued pollinators. Am. Natur., 133, 149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MULCAHY D.L. et D. CAPORELLO, 1970. —Pollen flow within a tristylous species: Lythrum salicaria. Am. J. Bot., 57, 1027–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIC LUGHADA E.M. et J.A.N. PARNELL, 1989. —Heterostyiy and gene flow in Menyanthes trifoliata L. (Menyanthaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 100, 337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OLESEN J.M., 1979. —Floral morphology and pollen flow in the heterostylous species Pulmonaria obscura Duncort (Boraginaceae). New Phytol., 82, 757–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORNDUFF R., 1971. —The reproductive system of Jepsonia heterandra. Evolution, 25, 300–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORNDUFF R., 1974. —Heterostyiy in South African plants: a conspectus. J. South African Botany, 40, 169–187.
   Google Scholar
• ORNDUFF R., 1975. —Complementary roles of halictids and syrphids in the pollination of Jepsonia heterandra (Saxifragaceae). Evolution, 29, 371–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORNDUFF R., 1976. —The reproductive system of Amsinckia grandiflora, a distylous species. Syst. Bot., 1, 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• ORNDUFF R., 1979. —Pollen flow in a population of Primula vulgaris Huds. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 78, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORNDUFF R., 1980. —Heterostyly, population composition and pollen flow in Hedyotis caerulea. Am. J. Bot., 67, 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PIPER J.G., B. CHARLESWORTH et D. CHARLESWORTH, 1986. —Breeding system evolution in Primula vulgaris and the role of reproductive assurance. Heredity, 56, 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PUECH S., 1986. —Production de diasporas et potentialités de germination chez quelques espèces à fruits charnus, ornithochores, dans le sud-est de la France. Ecol. Médit., tome XII, 1–2, 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• RICHARDS A.J., 1986. —Plant Breeding Systems. Allen & Unwin Ltd, Londres.
   Google Scholar
• SCHOU O. et M. PHILIPP, 1983. —An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system. II—Pollen tube growth and seed sets following compatible and incompatible crossings within Anchusa officinalis L. (Boraginaceae). In: Pollen: Biology and Implications for Plant Breeding. D.J. Mulcahy et E. Ottaviano (éd.), 219–227.
   Google Scholar
• SCHOU O. et M. PHILIPP, 1984. —An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system. 3—On the genetic control of distyly and the self-incompatibility in Anchusa officinalis L. (Boraginaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet., 68, 139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHIVANNA K.R., J. HESLOP-HARRISON et Y. HESLOP-HARRISON, 1983. —Heterostyly in Primula. 3—Pollen water economy: a factor in the intramorph-incompatibility response. Protoplasma, 117, 175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOBREVILA C., N. RAMIREZ et N. XENA DE ENRECH, 1983. —Reproductive biology of Palicourea fendleri and P. petiolaris (Rubiaceae), heterostylous shrubs of a tropical cloud forest In Venezuela. Biotropica, 15, 161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TAYLOR P.D., 1984. —Evolutionary stable reproductive allocations in heterostylous plants. Evolution, 38, 408–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VUILLEUMIER B.S., 1967. —The origin and evolutionary development of heterostyly in the Angiosperms. Evolution, 21, 210–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WASER N.M. et M.V. PRICE, 1938. —Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and the nature of plant—pollinator interaction. In: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. C.E. Jones et R.J. Little (éds.), Van Nostrand Reinhald, New York, 344–359.
   Google Scholar
• WEBB C.J. et D.G. LLOYD, 1986. —The avoidance of interference between presentation of pollen and stigmas in Angiosperms. II—Herkogamy. N. Z. J. Botany, 24, 163–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WELLER S.G. et R. ORNDUFF, 1977. —Cryptic self-incompatibility in Amsinckia grandiflora. Evolution, 31, 47–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WILLSON M.F., 1979. —Sexual selection in plants. Am. Natur., 113, 777–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WYATT R. et R.L. HELLWIG, 1979. —Factors determining fruit set in heterostylous bluets, Houstonia caerulea (Rubiaceae). Syst. Bot., 4, 103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar