Does the Governorship Matter for Provincial Economic Development?

References

• Akçakaya, M. (2017). Yeni yönetim anlayışının yerel yönetimlere yansımaları. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(9), 105–130. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gusbd/issue/29519/331001
   Google Scholar
• Apan, A. (2015). Avrupa Birliği’nin Türkiye’deki mülki idareye etkileri. Türk İdare Dergisi, 481, 305–334. https://www.acarindex.com/pdfs/818536
   Google Scholar
• Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Municipal performance: Does mayoral quality matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartik, T. J. (1991). Local economic development policies, Upjohn Institute (No. 3, p. 2). Staff Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, T., & Prat, A. (2006). Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. American Economic Review, 96(3), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borraz, O. (1999). Reforming local government in France: The case of two communautés urbaines. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.1999.11643375
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2013). Professionals and shifts in governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(12), 876–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.798809
   Google Scholar
• Bundervoet, T., Maiyo, L., & Sanghi, A. (2015). Bright lights, big cities: Measuring national and subnational economic growth in Africa from outer space, with an application to Kenya and Rwanda. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Campante, F. R., Chor, D., & Do, Q. A. (2009). Instability and the incentives for corruption. Economics & Politics, 21(1), 42–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capuno, J. J. (2005). The quality of local governance and development under decentralization in the Philippines (No. 2005, 06). UPSE discussion paper, University of the Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Çelenk, A. A. (2009). Europeanization and administrative reform: The case of Turkey. Mediterranean Politics, 14(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629390902747392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2011). Using luminosity data as a proxy for economic statistics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(21), 8589–8594. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1017031108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, S. S. (2007). Institutional innovations, asymmetric decentralization, and local economic development: A case study of Kunshan, in post-Mao China. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 25(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chigwata, T. (2010). A critical analysis of decentralization in Zimbabwe: Focus on the position and role of a provincial governor [Doctoral dissertation]. University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Çiner, C. U. (2014). Reconsidering the role of the prefects in Turkey: Public policies and metropolization. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(8), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.903277
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, W. J., & Polese, M. (1985). Local development: Conceptual bases and policy implications. Regional Studies, 19(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595238500185101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coviello, D., & Gagliarducci, S. (2017). Tenure in office and public procurement. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 59–105. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen, Z. (1985). The office of governor-general. Daedalus, 14(1), 127–146. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024957
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R., & Mair, A. (1988). Locality and community in the politics of local economic development. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croci Angelini, E. (2011). Globalization and public administration: A complex relationship. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(1–2), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.506089
   Google Scholar
• Dal Bó, E., & Rossi, M. A. (2011). Term length and the effort of politicians. The Review of Economic Studies, 78(4), 1237–1263. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirkaya, Y. (Ed.). (2016). New public management in Turkey: Local government reform. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Druzhinin, P. V. (2013). Assessment of the relationship between economic growth and political institutions in a region. Regional Research of Russia, 3(2), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970513020020
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, H. F., & Fattore, G. (2009). Definitions and typologies in public administration research: The case of decentralization. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(8), 704–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902908760
   Google Scholar
• Eisenschitz, A., & Gough, J. (1993a). Consensus strategies and their ambiguous politics. In Public Policy and Politics (Ed.), The politics of local economic policy (pp. 30–55). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22839-3_2
   Google Scholar
• Eisenschitz, A., & Gough, J. (1993b). The international economy and the future of local economic policy. In Public Policy and Politics (Ed.), The politics of local economic policy (pp. 260–273). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22839-3_11
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, K. P. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state: State and local economic development policy in the United States. University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elbanna, S., Andrews, R., & Pollanen, R. (2016). Strategic planning and implementation success in public service organizations: Evidence from Canada. Public Management Review, 18(7), 1017–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1051576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eryılmaz, B., & Tuncer, A. (2013). Avrupa Birliği uyum sürecinde bölgesel kalkınma politikaları: Bölgesel kalkınma ajansları ve Türkiye uygulaması. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi (AID), 8(1), 165–189. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/akademikincelemeler/issue/1545/18975#article_cite
   Google Scholar
• EUCD. (2017). The new European Consensus on Development our world, our dignity, our future. Retrieved March 29, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/european-consensus-on-development-final-20170626_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• French, R. (2009). The chief justice and the governor-general. Melbourne University Law Review, 33(3), 647. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.81114271147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamboa-Cavazos, M., Garza-Cantu, V., & Salinas, C. E. (2007). The organization of corruption: Political horizons and special interests. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.754325
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, M. (2005). Neoliberalism and local governance–cross-national perspectives and speculations. Policy Studies, 26(3–4), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870500198429
   Google Scholar
• Getha-Taylor, H., & Morse, R. S. (2013). Collaborative leadership development for local government officials: Exploring competencies and program impact. Public Administration Quarterly, 37(1), 71–102. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24371989
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, T., Anderson, S. J., Elvidge, C. D., & Sutton, P. C. (2013). Using night-time satellite imagery as a proxy measure of human well-being. Sustainability, 5(12), 4988–5019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5124988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, L. I., & Mamone, I. (2015). Distributive politics in developing federal democracies: Compensating governors for their territorial support. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(3), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00279.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güney, A., & Çelenk, A. A. (2010). Europeanization and the dilemma of decentralization: Centre–local relations in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies, 12(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2010.506810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. B. (1999). “Life is not fair”: Governors’ job performance ratings and state economies. Political Research Quarterly, 52(1), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, M. S. (2007). Theory and practice of public administration in Southeast Asia: Traditions, directions, and impacts. international Journal of Public Administration, 30(12–14), 1297–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701229434
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V., Storeygard, A., & Weil, D. N. (2012). Measuring economic growth from outer space. American Economic Review, 102(2), 994–1028. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, H. (1969). Administrative decentralization and political power. Public Administration Review, 29(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/973980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knott, J., & Miller, G. (1987). Reforming bureaucracy: The politics of institutional choice. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Malizia, E., Feser, E. J., Renski, H., & Drucker, J. (2020). Understanding local economic development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mellander, C., Lobo, J., Stolarick, K., & Matheson, Z. (2015). Night-time light data: A good proxy measure for economic activity?. PloS One, 10(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miquel, G. P. I., & Snyder, J. M., Jr. (2006). Legislative effectiveness and legislative careers. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 31(3), 347–381. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298006X201841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel, E. (2001). Local economic development: A review and assessment of its current status in South Africa. Urban Studies, 38(7), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120051611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P. (2000). Changing patterns of regional governance in the EU. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050011145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okubo, D. (2010). Fiscal sustainability and local government. National Civic Review, 99(4), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.20035
   Google Scholar
• Olvera, J. G., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2019). Subnational government performance: Testing multiple dimensions of governors’ experience. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan, G. B. (2000). Local economic development, decentralization and consensus building in Turkey. Progress in Planning, 54(4), 199–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik, W. (2012). Economic development and mass political participation in contemporary China: Determinants of provincial petition (Xinfang) activism 1994–2002. International Political Science Review, 33(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512111409528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panara, C. (2019). Deconstructing and reconstructing good governance in relation to regional and local participation in EU. In G. Abels & J. Battke (Eds.), Regional governance in the EU (pp. 33–51). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pankaj, A. (2017). Governor in Indian federalism—II: Hiatus between constitutional intents and practices. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 63(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556117689850
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, J. D. (2014). The French revolution’s royal governor: General Blanchelande and Saint Domingue, 1790–92. The William and Mary Quarterly, 71(2), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.5309/willmaryquar.71.2.0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querubin, P. (2012). Political reform and elite persistence: Term limits and political dynasties in the Philippines. In APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper, (SSRN). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3779023
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J., & Robertson, G. B. (2012). Subnational appointments in authoritarian regimes: Evidence from Russian gubernatorial appointments. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaş-Yavuzçehre, P. (2016). The effects of the Law No. 6360 on metropolitan municipality system in Turkey. European Scientific Journal, 46, 291–303. https://l24.im/GzCs
   Google Scholar
• Sharafutdinova, G., & Steinbuks, J. (2017). Governors matter: A comparative study of state–business relations in Russia’s regions. Economics of Transition, 25(3), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonet, D. (2011). The new public management theory and the reform of European health care systems: An international comparative perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(12), 815–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.603401
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, B. (2009). Why the governor general matters. In P. H. Russell & L. Sossin (Eds.), Parliamentary democracy in crisis (pp. 79–90). University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorabjee, S. J. (Ed.). (1985). The governor: Sage or saboteur. Roli Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sribnick, E. G. (Ed.). (2013). A legacy of innovation: Governors and public policy. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, P. C., Elvidge, C. D., & Ghosh, T. (2007). Estimation of gross domestic product at sub-national scales using night time satellite imagery. International Journal of Ecological Economics & Statistics, 8(7), 5–21. https://l24.im/OKAb
   Google Scholar
• Taştekin, A. (2018). Türkiye’de Bölgesel Kalkınma Stratejileri ve Bölge İdareleri. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 1(1), 69–83. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mana/issue/36781/407467
   Google Scholar
• Teaford, J. C. (2008). Governors and economic development. In E. G. Sribnick (Ed.), A legacy of innovation: Governors and public policy (pp. 107–123). University of Pennsylvania Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhd1z.10
   Google Scholar
• Tüfekçi, Ö. (2020a). Küreselleşme ve Kamu Yönetimi. In U. Abdullah (Ed.), Kamu Yönetimi in (pp. 237–255). Atatürk Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi.
   Google Scholar
• Tüfekçi, Ö. (2020b). Kamu Yönetiminde Reform. In U. Abdullah (Ed.), Kamu Yönetimi içinde (pp. 256–274). Atatürk Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi.
   Google Scholar
• UCLG Policy Paper. (2016). The role of local governments in territorial economic development. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Uslu, H., & Dag, R. (2019). Relations between endurance of ruling political party and economic development. Political Reflection Magazine, 5(1), 25–30. https://l24.im/Lp0
   Google Scholar
• Üstüner, Y., & Yavuz, N. (2018). Turkey’s public administration today: An overview and appraisal. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(10), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1387147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchi, V., Brusoni, M., & Borgonovi, E. (2014). Public authorities for entrepreneurship: A management approach to execute competitiveness policies. Public Management Review, 16(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.725759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R. (2014). Second generation fiscal federalism: Political aspects of decentralization and economic development. World Development, 53, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldızcan, C., & Bayraktar, U. (2019). The empowerment of Turkish governors within hybrid settings of public administration. Mediterranean Politics, 24(3), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2017.1398889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Gao, Y. (2008). Term limits and rotation of Chinese governors: Do they matter to economic growth?. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 13(3), 274–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860802131284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar