Publication Cover
The Information Society
An International Journal
Volume 40, 2024 - Issue 3
102
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Clip the blue bird: Discursive strategies of Hindutva digital mobilization against Twitter in India

&
Pages 232-244 | Received 09 May 2022, Accepted 01 Mar 2024, Published online: 17 Mar 2024

References

  • Askanius, T. 2012. Radical online video: YouTube, video activism and social movement media practices. Doctoral diss., Lund University.
  • Atton, C. 2002. Alternative media. London: Sage.
  • Belotti, F., F. Comunello, and C. Corradi. 2021. Feminicidio and #NiUna Menos: An analysis of Twitter conversations during the first 3 years of the Argentinean movement. Violence against Women 27 (8):1035–63. doi:10.1177/1077801220921947.
  • Benkler, Y. R., H. Roberts, and R. Faris. 2018. Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bhatia, K. V. 2021. The revolution will wear burqas: Feminist body politics and online activism in India. Social Movement Studies 21 (5):625–41. doi:10.1080/14742837.2021.1944850.
  • Bhatia, K. V. 2022. Hindu nationalism online: Twitter as discourse and interface. Religions 13 (8):739. doi:10.3390/rel13080739.
  • Bhatia, K. V. 2023. Bottom-up imaginaries: Examining discursive construction of social media roles and affordances in India. Contemporary South Asia 31 (2):251–67. doi:10.1080/09584935.2023.2206996.
  • Bhatia, K. V., and R. Gajjala. 2020. Examining anti-CAA protests at Shaheen Bagh: Muslim women and politics of the Hindu India. International Journal of Communication 14 (18):6286–303.
  • Boulianne, S., and Y. Theocharis. 2020. Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review 38 (2):111–27. doi:10.1177/0894439318814190.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Brosius, C. 2005. Empowering visions: The politics of representation in Hindu nationalism. London: Anthem Press.
  • Chander, A., and U. P. Lê. 2015. Data nationalism. Emory Law Journal 64 (3):677–739.
  • Chatterji, A. P., T. B. Hansen, and C. Jaffrelot, eds. 2019. Majoritarian state: How Hindu nationalism is changing India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Chen, H.-T., M. Chan, and F. L. F. Lee. 2016. Social media use and democratic engagement: A comparative study of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China. Chinese Journal of Communication 9 (4):348–66. doi:10.1080/17544750.2016.1210182.
  • Couldry, N., and U. Mejias. 2019. Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media 20 (4):336–49. doi:10.1177/1527476418796632.
  • Donovan, J., B. Lewis, and B. Friedberg. 2019. Parallel ports: Sociotechnical change from the alt-right to alt-tech. In Post-digital cultures of the far right: Online actions and offline consequences in Europe and the US, eds. M. Fielitz and N. Thurston, 49–66. Wetzlar, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
  • Frayer, L., and S. Bond. 2021. Twitter in a standoff with India’s government over free speech and local law. NPR.com, February 18. Accessed November 12, 2023. https://www.npr.org/2021/02/17/968641246/twitter-in-standoff-with-indias-government-over-free-speech-and-local-law
  • Freelon, D., C. Mcllwain, and M. Clark. 2016. Beyond the hashtags: #Blacklivesmatter, #Ferguson, and the online struggle for offline justice. Washington, DC: Center for Media and Social Impact, American University.
  • Futrell, R., P. Simi, and S. Gottschalk. 2006. Understanding music in movements: The white power music scene. The Sociological Quarterly 47 (2):275–304. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00046.x.
  • Gaudette, T., R. Scrivens, G. Davies, and R. Frank. 2020. Upvoting extremism: Collective identity formation and the extreme right on Reddit. New Media & Society 23 (12):3491–508. doi:10.1177/1461444820958123.
  • Greene, D., and D. Joseph. 2015. The digital spatial fix. Triple C 13 (2):223–47.
  • Han-Wei, L. 2018. Data localization and digital trade barriers: ASEAN in mega-regionalism. In ASEAN law in the new regional economic order: Global trends and shifting paradigms, eds. P. L. Hsieh and B. Mercurio, 371–91. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hariman, R. 2008. Political parody and public culture. Quarterly Journal of Speech 94 (3):247–72. doi:10.1080/00335630802210369.
  • Hasson, P. 2020. The manipulators: Facebook, Google, Twitter, and Big Tech’s war on conservatives. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Jackson, S., B. Bailey, and B. F. Welles. 2020. #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. The MIT Press Direct. doi:10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001.
  • Leidig, E. C. 2019. Immigrant, nationalist and proud: A Twitter analysis of Indian diaspora supporters for Brexit and Trump. Media and Communication 7 (1):77–89. doi:10.17645/mac.v7i1.1629.
  • Lima, L., J. C. S. Reis, P. Melo, F. Murai, L. Araujo, P. Vikatos, and F. Benevenuto. 2018. Inside the right-leaning echo chambers: Characterizing gab, an unmoderated social system. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 515–522. New York: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508809.
  • Lyons, K., J. Salazar Parreñas, N. Tamarkin, B. Subramaniam, L. Green, and T. Pérez-Bustos. 2017. Engagements with decolonization and decoloniality in and at the interfaces of STS. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 3 (1):1–47. doi:10.28968/cftt.v3i1.28794.
  • Marwick, A., and R. Lewis. 2017. Media manipulation and disinformation online. New York: Data and Society Research Institute. Accessed November 12, 2023. https://datasociety.net/library/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/
  • Masroor, F., Q. N. Khan, I. Aib, and Z. Ali. 2019. Polarization and ideological weaving in Twitter discourse of politicians. Social Media + Society 5 (4):205630511989122. doi:10.1177/2056305119891220.
  • McGregor, S. C., and L. Molyneux. 2018. Twitter’s influence on news judgment: An experiment among journalists. Journalism 21 (5):597–613. doi:10.1177/1464884918802975.
  • Meyer, M. 2001. Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches of CDA. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, eds. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 14–32. London: Sage.
  • Morozov, E. 2011. The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
  • Nissenbaum, A., and L. Shifman. 2017. Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s/b/board. New Media & Society 19 (4):483–501. doi:10.1177/1461444815609313.
  • Simi, P., and S. Windisch. 2020. The culture of violent talk: An interpretive approach. Social Sciences 9 (7):120. doi:10.3390/socsci9070120.
  • Statzel, S. 2008. Cybersupremacy: The new face of white supremacist activism. In Digital media and democracy: Tactics in hard times, eds. M. Boler, 405–28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Sundaram, R. 2020. Hindu nationalism’s crisis machine. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 10 (3):734–41. doi:10.1086/712222.
  • Thatcher, J., D. O’Sullivan, and D. Mahmoudi. 2016. Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (6):990–1006. doi:10.1177/0263775816633195.
  • The Hindu. 2021. War of words: On Twitter’s blocking of Ravi Shankar Prasad account. The Hindu, June 29. Accessed March 1, 2024. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/war-of-words-on-twitters-blocking-of-ravi-shankar-prasad-account/article35027036.ece.
  • Tufekci, Z. 2017. Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Udupa, S. 2014. Online archiving as claims to history: New media and religious politics in India. MMG Working Papers 14–10. Göttingen, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.
  • Udupa, S. 2019. India needs a fresh strategy to tackle online extreme speech. Economic and Political Weekly 54 (45):7–8.
  • Van Dijk, T. 1997. Discourse as structure and process of discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. 2006a. Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society 17 (3):359–83. doi:10.1177/0957926506060250.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. 2006b. Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2):115–40. doi:10.1080/13569310600687908.
  • Webb, H., M. Jirotka, B. C. Stahl, W. Housley, A. Edwards, M. Williams, R. Procter, O. Rana, and P. Burnap. 2017. The ethical challenges of publishing Twitter data for research dissemination. In Proceedings of the 20 ACM on Web Science Conference—Websci’17, 339–348. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3091478.3091489.
  • Zaber, M., B. Nardi, and J. Chen. 2017. A study of hashtag activism for raising awareness about riverbank erosion in Bangladesh. In LIMITS ‘17: Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits, 51–58. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3080556.3080557.
  • Zannettou, S., B. Bradlyn, E. De Cristofaro, H. Kwak, M. Sirivianos, M. Stringhini, G. Stringhini, and J. Blackburn. 2018. What is gab? A bastion of free speech or an Alt-Right echo chamber? In WWW ‘18: Companion Proceedings of The Web Conference, 1007–14. New York: ACM.
  • Zhang, C. 2020. Right-wing populism with Chinese characteristics? Identity, otherness and global imaginaries in debating world politics online. European Journal of International Relations 26 (1):88–115. doi:10.1177/1354066119850253.
  • Zhu, Q., M. Skoric, and F. Shen. 2017. I shield myself from thee: Selective avoidance on social media during political protests. Political Communication 34 (1):112–31. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1222471.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.