Introduction to section 3

References

• Akhmouch, A., Clavreul, D., & Glas, P. (2018). Introducing the OECD principles on water governance. Water International, 43(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2017.1407561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belokurov, A., Déchelette, C., Griffiths, M., Halpern, G., Seguin, P., & Zinke, A. (2024). A shared water culture between the European Union and the countries of the eastern neighbourhood. Water International, 49(3–4), 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2321772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comité de Bassin de Corse. (2018). Plan de bassin d’adaptation au changement climatique dans le domaine de l’eau. Bassin de Corse
   Google Scholar
• Estrela, T., & Sancho, T. (2016). Drought management policies in Spain and the European Union: From traditional emergency actions to Drought Management Plans. Water Policy, 18(2016),153–176. IWA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2016.018
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008). Drought management plan report. Including agricultural, drought indicators and climate change aspects. Technical Report - 2008 – 023.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Synthesis document n°8 ‘Windows of opportunities’ for Natural Water Retention Measures, NWRM SD8, European commission directorate general environment and NWRM project team, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). The European green deal: Striving to be the first climate-neutral continent. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (n.d). Team Europe initiatives. https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/policies/team-europe-initiatives_en
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2007). Directive 2007/60 on the assessment and management of flood risks.
   Google Scholar
• Freak, C., & Miller, C. (2024). Take it as a compliment: Integrating complementary measures as the next chapter of murray-darling basin water management. Water International, 49(3–4), 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2325790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrote, L. (2017). Managing water resources to adapt to climate change: Facing uncertainty and scarcity in a changing context. Water Resources Management, 31(10), 2951–2963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1714-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Summary for policymakers. In H. Lee & J. Romero (Eds.), Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups i, ii and iii to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [core writing team (pp. 1–34). IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001
   Google Scholar
• Lester, S. (2024). Rethinking urban water management: A case study of vulnerability in the Kingston Basin. Water International, 49(3–4), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2321809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015a). Stakeholder engagement for inclusive water governance, OECD studies on water. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264231122-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015b). Water resources allocation: Sharing risks and opportunities, OECD studies on water. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229631-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015c). OECD principles on water governance. http://www.oecd.org/governance/oecd-principles-on-water-governance.htm
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Implementing the OECD principles on water governance: Indicator framework and evolving practices, oecd studies on water. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292659-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). Applying the OECD principles on water governance to flood. A checklist for action. OECD Studies on Water. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d5098392-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (n.d). Aid to the water and sanitation sector. https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-topics/water-relatedaid.htm
   Google Scholar
• Owino, J. P. (2024). Benefit sharing dialogue to promote and guide investment decisions in the Sio-Malaba-Malakisi (SMM) transboundary basin, shared between Kenya and Uganda. Water International, 49(3–4), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2321782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmesan, C., Morecroft, M. D., & Trisurat, Y. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. [Research Report] GIEC. HAL Open Science. https://hal.science/hal-03774939
   Google Scholar
• Poncin, M., Ogilvie, A., Descroix, L., Chariag, I., & Balique, C. (2024). How does a masterplan contribute to strengthening transboundary water management? Case study in West Africa. Water International, 49(3–4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2321785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radini, S., González-Camejo, J., Andreola, C., Eusebi, A. L., & Fatone, F. (2023). Risk management and digitalization to overcome barriers for safe reuse of urban wastewater for irrigation – A review based on European practice. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 53(2023), 103690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103690
   Google Scholar
• Riera, F. S., Mijangos Pulido, V. M., Livier De Regil Sánchez, I., & Hoffmeister, M. (2024). Integrated solutions to improve wastewater quality in Mendoza and Santiago river basin. Water International, 49(3–4), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2321816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugel, K. (2024). Up close and personal: An essential ingredient in transboundary water basin agreements. Water International, 49(3–4), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2321794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaniego, L., Thober, S., Wanders, N., Pan, M., Rakovec, O., Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., Prudhomme, C., Rees, G., Houghton-Carr, H., Fry, M., Smith, K., Watts, G., Hisdal, H., Estrela, T., Buontempo, C., Marx, A., & Kumar, R. (2019). Hydrological forecasts and projections for improved decision-making in the water sector in Europe. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society (BAMS), 100(12), 2451–2472. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0274.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterckx, A., Fraser, C., Pietersen, K., & Diene, M. (2024). Institutionalizing groundwater management and transboundary aquifer cooperation in Sub-Saharan lake and river basin organizations. Water International, 49(3–4), 552–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2321810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik, M. H., Hassan, R., Stephan, R. M., & Rezk, A. (2024). Towards effective cooperation dynamics in transboundary river basins: A case study of the Nile and Orontes Rivers. Water International, 49(3–4), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2321792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDDR. (2019). Words into action. Engaging for resilience in support of the sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2022). Transboundary aquifers: Challenges and the way forward (R. Sanchez, Ed.).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2023). The United Nations World Water development report, 2023: Partnerships and cooperation for water. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Yasuda, Y., Demydenko, Y., Faloutsos, D., & Tremblay-Lévesque, L.-C. (2024). Multi-stakeholder regional dialogues as catalyzers for transboundary water cooperation, Water International, 49(3–4), 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2321798
   Google Scholar