References
- Dijkstra, L.; Poelman, H.; Veneri, P. (2019): The EU-OECD definition of a functional urban area. Paris: OECD.
- ESPON (2021): The role and future perspectives of Cohesion Policy in the planning of Metropolitan Areas and Cities – Main Report. Luxembourg: ESPON EGTC.
- ESPON (2023): Territorial governance of non-standard geographies – Terms of Reference. Luxembourg: ESPON EGTC.
- Faludi, A. (2018): The Poverty of Territorialism: A Neo-Medieval View of Europe and European Planning. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
- Fioretti, C.; Pertoldi, M.; Busti, M.; Van Heerden, S. (eds.) (2020): Handbook of Sustainable Urban Development Strategies, EUR 29990 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Folke, C.; Pritchard Jr, L.; Berkes, F.; Colding, J.; Svedin, U. (2007): The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecology and Society, 12 (1); DOI: 10.5751/ES-02064-120130.
- Janin Rivolin, U.; Santangelo, M.; Cotella, G.; Governa, F.; Caruso, N.; De Luca, A. (2014): Towards Better Territorial Governance in Europe: A Guide for Practitioners, Policy and Decision Makers. Luxembourg: ESPON EGTC.
- Moss, T. (2012): Spatial fit, from panacea to practice: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive. Ecology and Society, 17 (3); DOI: 10.5751/es-04821-170302.
- Ostrom, E.; Janssen, M. A.; Anderies, J. M. (2007): Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (39), pp. 15176–15178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701886104
- Salet, W.; Vermeulen, R.; Savini, F.; Dembski, S.; Thierstein, A.; Nears, P. et al. (2015): Planning for the new European metropolis: functions, politics, and symbols. Planning Theory & Practice, 16 (2), pp. 251–275. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1021574