References
- Armaş, I.; Toma-Danila, D.; Ionescu, R.; Gavriş, A. (2017): Vulnerability to earthquake hazard: Bucharest case study, Romania. International journal of disaster risk science, 8, pp.182–195. doi: 10.1007/s13753-017-0132-y
- Cavalcanti, M. D. B. U. (1997): Urban reconstruction and autocratic regimes: Ceausescu’s Bucharest in its historic context. Planning Perspectives, 12(1), pp.71–109. doi: 10.1080/026654397364780
- Cercleux, A. L. (2021): Street Art Participation in Increasing Investments in the City Center of Bucharest, a Paradox or Not? Sustainability, 13 (24), 13697. doi: 10.3390/su132413697
- Danta, D. (1993): Ceausescu’s Bucharest. Geographical Review, 83(2), pp.170–182. doi: 10.2307/215255
- Dumbrăveanu, D. (2010): Place branding: a challenging process for Bucharest the capital city of Romania. Human Geographies, 4(2), pp. 53–62.
- Ernst, F. (1791): PLAN – der Wallachischen – Haupt u. Residenz-Stadt – BUKUREST.
- Florescu, T.; Moscu, C. I.; Gociman, C. O.; Georgescu, M. S.; Dragomir, C. S.; Craifaleanu, C. S.; Georgescu, E. S. (2014): Urban Heritage and Multi-Hazard Threats. Case Study of Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping in a Protected Area of Bucharest, Romania. In Proc. The 1st Huixian International Forum on Earthquake Engineering for Young Researchers.
- Florescu, T. (coord.) (2012): Dynamic Master Plan for the 21st Century – a change of paradigm in contemporary Romanian urban planning (in Romanian). Bucharest: “Ion Mincu” University Publishing House.
- Floroiu, I. S.; Cocheci, R. M. (2019): The need for optimizing urban space. The analysis of urban density and urbanization patterns in the Bucharest–Ilfov region, Romania. Argument, 11, pp. 51–69.
- Grigoraș, G.; Urițescu, B. (2019): Land use/land cover changes dynamics and their effects on surface urban heat island in Bucharest, Romania. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 80, pp.115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2019.03.009
- Ianoş, I.; Sorensen, A.; Merciu, C. (2017): Incoherence of urban planning policy in Bucharest: Its potential for land use conflict. Land Use Policy, 60, pp. 101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.030
- Nadin, V.; Stead, D.; Dąbrowski, M.; Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2021): Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: Trends across Europe. Regional studies, 55 (5), pp.791–803. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363
- Nae, M.; Turnock, D. (2011): The new Bucharest: Two decades of restructuring. Cities, 28 (2), pp. 206–219. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2010.04.004
- Săgeată, R. (2008): Bucharest. Geographical and Geopolitical Considerations. Revista Română de Geografie Politică, 10 (1), pp. 37–56.
- Toșa, C.; Mitrea, A.; Sato, H.; Miwa, T.; Morikawa, T. (2018): Economic growth and urban metamorphosis. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), pp.273–295. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2018.1242
- Turnock, D. (1990): Bucharest. Cities, 7 (2), pp.107–118. doi: 10.1016/0264-2751(90)90065-F