Comparison of single vs composite soil electrical apparent conductivity-directed samples of irrigated soils for inorganic nitrogen estimation with electromagnetic induction sensors

References

• Adamchuk VI. 2010. Precision agriculture: does it make sense? Better Crops 94: 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Amezketa E. 2007. Soil salinity assessment using directed soil sampling from a geophysical survey with electromagnetic technology: a case study. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 5: 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARC-SCW, 2017. Meteorological data base. Pretoria: Agriculture Research Council – Soil, Climate and Water (ARC-SCW).
   Google Scholar
• Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, Mcvicar TR, Vergopolon N, Berg A, Wood EF. 2018. Present and future of Köppen–Geiger climate classification maps at 1 km resolution. Science Data 5: 180214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 327: 307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corwin DL. 2013. Site-specific management and delineating management zones. In: Oliver M, Bishop T, Marchand B. Precision agriculture for sustainability and environmental protection. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corwin DL, Lesch SM. 2005. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46:11–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corwin DL, Lesch SM, Oster JD, Kaffka SR. 2006. Monitoring management-induced spatio-temporal changes in soil quality through soil sampling directed by apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma 131: 369–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corwin DL, Lesch SM, Shouse PJ, Soppe R, Ayars JE. 2008. Delineating site-specific management units using geospatial ECa measurements. In: Allred BJ, Daniels JJ, Ehsani MR (eds). Handbook of agricultural geophysics. Baco Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corwin DL, Scudiers E. 2016. Field-scale apparent soil electrical conductivity. In: Logsdon L (ed). Methods of soil analysis. Madison: Soil Science Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Dahnke WC, Johnson GV. 1990. Testing soils for available nitrogen. In: Westerman R L (ed). Soil testing and plant analysis (3rd edn). Madison: Soil Science Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Dinkins CP, Jones C. 2017. Soil sampling strategies. MontGuide MT200803AG, Montana State University Extension, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn T. 2015. Nitrogen sources. University of Nebraska, USA. http://lancaster.unl.edu/ag/factsheets/288.pdf (Accessed 08/12/2015)
   Google Scholar
• Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA. 1998. Electromagnetic survey of cornfield with repeated manure applications. Journal of Environmental Quality 27: 1511–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn R. 2015. Interpreting soil tests: unlock the secrets in your soil. NMSU Cooperative Extension Service Circular 676, New Mexico State University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Franzen DW, Cihacek LJ. 1998. Soil sampling as a basis for fertilizer application. NDSU Extension Publication SF-990, North Dakota State University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gelderman RH, Beegle D. 2012. Nitrate-nitrogen. In: Recommended chemical soil test procedures for the North Central region. North Central Regional Research Publication No 221, North Central Agricultural Experiment Stations, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Geonics Ltd. 2010. Operating instructions: EM38-MK2 data logging system for field computers. Archer and Allegro MX. EM38-MK2 Version 2.02. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Grisso R, Alley M, Holshouser D, Thomason W. 2009. Precision farming tools: soil electrical conductivity (Virginia Cooperative Extension, publication 422-508). Petersburg: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hanquet B, Frankinet M, Parez V, Destain MF. 2002. Mapping within-field soil variability for precision agriculture using electromagnetic induction. Proceedings of the European Agricultural Engineering Conference Paper No-02-PA-004, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Hartz TK. 2007. Soil testing for nutrient availability – procedures and interpretation for California vegetable crop production. Vegetable Research Institute, University of California, USA. https://vric.ucdavis.edu/pdf/fertilization_Soiltestingfornutrientavailability2007.pdf [Accessed 13/12/2018].
   Google Scholar
• Havlin JL, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL, Beaton JD. 2014. Soil fertility and fertilizers: an introduction to nutrient management (8th edn). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Heil K, Schmidhalter U. 2017. The application of EM38: determination of soil parameters, selection of soil sampling points and use in agriculture and archaeology. Sensors 17: 2540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks J. 2011. An analysis of precision agriculture in the South African summer grain producing areas. MBA Mini-dissertation, North-West University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Horneck DA, Sulllivan DM, Owen JS, Hart JM. 2011. Soil test interpretation guide. Publication EC1478, Oregon State University Extension, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jones C, Jacobsen J, Olson-Rutz K, 2014. Nutrient management, module 1 – soil sampling and laboratory selection. Publication 4449-1, Montana State University Extension, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jurisic A, Mesic M, Sestak I, Zgorelec Z. 2013. Horizontal and vertical nitrate-nitrogen distribution under different nitrogen fertilizer levels. 12th Alps-Adria Scientific Workshop, Venezia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles O, Dawson A. 2018. Current soil sampling methods – a review. In: Currie LD, Christensen CL. (eds). Farm environmental planning – science, policy and practice. Occasional Report No. 31, Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Korsaeth A. 2005. Soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) as a means of monitoring changes in soil inorganic N on heterogeneous morainic soils in SE Norway during two growing seasons. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 72: 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesch S M, Rhoades J D, Corwin D L. 2000. ESAP-95 version 2.01R – User manual and tutorial guide. In: Brown G E (ed). Research report No 146. United States Department of Agriculture, Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lesch SM, Strauss DJ, Rhoades DJ. 1995a. Spatial prediction of soil salinity using electromagnetic induction techniques. 1. Statistical prediction models: a comparison of multiple linear regression and cokriging. Water Resources Research 31: 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesch SM, Strauss DJ, Rhoades DJ. 1995b. Spatial prediction of soil salinity using electromagnetic induction techniques. 2. An efficient spatial sampling algorithm suitable for multiple regression identification and estimation. Water Resources Research 31: 387–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard DG, Kalra YP, Crumbaugh JA. 2007. Nitrate and exchangeable ammonium nitrogen. In: Carter M R, Gregorich E G (eds). Soil sampling and methods of analysis (2nd edn). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvaney RL. 1996. Nitrogen – inorganic forms. In: Sparks D L (ed). Methods of soil analysis, Part 3 – Chemical methods. Madison: Soil Science Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Peters JB, Laboski CAM. 2013. Sampling soils for testing. Publication A2100, University of Wisconsin Extension, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Rains GC, Porter W, Perry CD. 2016. Soil sampling for precision management of crop production. UGA Extension Bulletin 1208, University of Georgia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soil Classification Working Group. 1991. Soil classification: a taxonomic system for South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Agricultural Development.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford JV. 2000. Implementing precision agriculture in the 21st century. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 76: 267–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudduth KA, Drummond ST, Kitchen NR. 2001. Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 31: 239–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Non-Affiliated Soil Analysis Work Committee. 1990. Handbook of standard soil testing methods for advisory purposes. Pretoria: Soil Science Society of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Van Huyssteen CW. 2020. Relating the South African soil taxonomy to the world reference base for soil resources. Bloemfontein: Sun Media.
   Google Scholar
• Walworth JL. 2011. Soil sampling and analysis. Publication AZ1412, Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Arizona, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Walworth JL. 2013. Nitrogen in soil and the environment. Publication AZ1591. Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Arizona, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wienhold BJ, Doran JW. 2008. Apparent electrical conductivity for delineating spatial variability in soil properties. In: Alfred BJ, Daniels JJ, Ehsani, MR (eds). Handbook of agricultural geophysics. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar