The emotional presence of nature: Exploring affect in human-wilderness relations

References

• Anderson, B. (2006). Becoming and being hopeful: Towards a theory of affect. Environment and Planning D, Society & Space, 24(5), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1068/d393t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2009). Non-representational theory. In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. J. Watts, & S. Whatmore (Eds.), Dictionary of human geography (pp. 503–505). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2014). Affects. In P. Cloke, P. Crang, & M. Goodman (Eds.), Introducing human geographies (pp. 760–772). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2016). Researching affect and emotion. In N. Clifford, M. Cope, T. Gillespie, & S. French (Eds.), Key methods in geography (pp. 182–197). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., & Peters, K. (2014). A perfect and absolute blank’: Human geographies of water worlds. In J. Anderson & K. Peters (Eds.), Water worlds: Human geographies of the ocean (pp. 3–19). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Barnfield, A. (2016). Public health, physical exercise and non-representational theory – a mixed method study of recreational running in Sofia, Bulgaria. Critical Public Health, 26(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2015.1029434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blahna, D. J., Cerveny, L. K., Williams, D. R., Kline, J. D., Helmer, M., McCool, S. F., & Valenzuela, F. (2020). Rethinking “outdoor recreation” to account for the diversity of human experiences and connections to public lands. In S. Selin, L. K. Cerveny, D. J. Blahna, & A. B. Miller (Eds.), Igniting research for outdoor recreation: Linking science, policy, and action (Gen. Tech. Rep., PNW-GTR-987 (pp. 65–83). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, D. (2020). Nature sports: Ontology, embodied being, politics. Annals of Leisure Research, 23(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2018.1524306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrie, W. T., & Armatas, C. A. (2022). Environmental values and nature’s contributions to people: Towards methodological pluralism in evaluation of sustainable ecosystem services. In I. Misiune, D. Depellegrin, & L. E. Vigl (Eds.), Human-nature interactions: Exploring nature’s values across landscapes (pp. 13–23). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Humberstone, B. (2015). Introduction. In M. Brown & B. Humberstone(Eds.), Shaped by the sea: Embodied narratives and fluid geographies (pp. 1–11). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bugbee, H. G. (1974). Wilderness in America. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 42(4), 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/XLII.4.614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2018). Affective encounters: Enchantment and the possibility of reading for pleasure. Literacy, 52(2), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadman, L. (2009). Nonrepresentational theory/nonrepresentational geographies. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (Vol. 7, pp. 456–463). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. S. (2008). More‐than‐representational knowledge/s of the countryside: How we think as bodies. Sociologia ruralis, 48(4), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cater, C., & Cloke, P. (2007). Bodies in action: The performativity of adventure tourism. Anthropology Today, 23(6), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2007.00548.x
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. M., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G. W., Martín-López, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., & Turner, N. (2016). Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(6), 1462–1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. N. (2005). Symbolic values: The overlooked values that make wilderness unique. International Journal of Wilderness, 11(2), 23–27, 10. https://srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/23522
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S., & Brown, H. (2007). The growing challenge of managing outdoor recreation. Journal of Forestry, 105(7), 371–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dustin, D. L. (2003). Wilderness and everyday life. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 74(6), 25–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2003.10609215
   Google Scholar
• Dvorak, R. G., & Borrie, W. T. (2007). Changing relationships with wilderness: A new focus for research and stewardship. International Journal of Wilderness, 13(3), 12–15. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/29190
   Google Scholar
• Evers, C. (2004). Men who surf. Cultural Studies Review, 10(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v10i1.3519
   Google Scholar
• Evers, C. (2006). How to surf (research and methodology). Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 30(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723506290394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, C. (2009). The point: Surfing, geography and a sensual life of men and masculinity on the Gold Coast, Australia. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(8), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360903305783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, M. E., & Hall, T. E. (2007). Emotion and environment: Visitors’ extraordinary experiences along the Dalton Highway in Alaska. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(2), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2007.11950107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friskics, S. (2011). Wilderness and everyday life ( Unpublished master’s thesis). University of North Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M. (2014). The wilderness writings of Howard Zahniser. University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, R. B., IV. (1990). Emotion and leisure: Causes and consequences. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1990.11969818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, R. B. I., & Michael, S. E. (1995). Nature-based recreation, mood change, and stress reduction. Leisure Sciences, 17, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409509513239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humberstone, B. (2011). Embodiment and social and environmental action in nature-based sport: Spiritual spaces. Leisure Studies, 30(4), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2011.602421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humberstone, B. (2012). How to find happiness. New materialism, leisure, and the environment. In K. Spracklen & A. Adams (Eds.), Sport and leisure ethics, rights, and social relationships (pp. 29–40). Leisure Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Humberstone, B. (2015). Embodiment, nature and wellbeing. In M. Robertson, R. Lawrence, & G. Heath (Eds.), Experiencing the outdoors: Enhancing strategies for wellbeing (pp. 61–72). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. H., Fehres, P., & Campbell, M. (2012). Measuring emotions toward wildlife: A review of generic methods and instruments. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 17(4), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2012.680175
   Google Scholar
• Kumm, B. E., & Berbary, L. A. (2018). Questions for postqualitative inquiry: Conversations to come. Leisure Sciences, 40(1–2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2017.1376014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumm, B. E., Berbary, L. A., & Grimwood, B. S. (2019). For those to come: An introduction to why posthumanism matters. Leisure Sciences, 41(5), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2019.1628677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landres, P., Barns, C., Boutcher, S., Devine, T., Dratch, P., Lindholm, A., Merigliano, L., Roeper, N., & Simpson, E. (2015). Keeping it wild 2: An updated interagency strategy to monitor trends in wilderness character across the national wilderness preservation system Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-340. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-340
   Google Scholar
• Latham, A. (2003). Research, performance, and doing human geography: Some reflections on the diary-photograph diary-interview method. Environment & Planning A, 35, 1993–2017. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, A. (2004). Researching and writing everyday accounts of the city: An introduction to the diary-photo diary-interview method. In C. Knowles & P. Sweetman (Eds.), Picturing the social landscape: Visual methods and the sociological imagination (pp. 117–131). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, A. (2014). Using diaries to study urban worlds. In K. Ward (Ed.), Researching the city: A guide for students (pp. 128–148). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, A. (2016). Respondent diaries. In N. Clifford, M. Cope, T. Gillespie, & S. French (Eds.), Key methods in geography (pp. 157–168). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, A., & McCormack, D. P. (2009). Thinking with images in non-representational cities: Vignettes from Berlin. Area, 41(3), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00868.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, H. (2015). Afterword: Non-representational theory and me too. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 178–187). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCool, S. F., & Freimund, W. A. (2016). Maintaining relevancy: Implications of changing societal connections to wilderness for stewardship agencies. Journal of Forestry, 114(3), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCool, S. F., Selin, S., & Valenzuela, F. (2020). Laying the foundation. In S. Selin, L. K. Cerveny, D. J. Blahna, & A. B. Miller (Eds.), Igniting research for outdoor recreation: Linking science, policy, and action (Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-987 (pp. 151–159). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, S. (2011). The body and the senses: Visual methods, videography and the submarine sensorium. Body & Society, 17(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X10394670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pile, S. (2010). Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, S. L., Borrie, W. T., & Patterson, M. E. (2000). Women, wilderness, and everyday life: A documentation of the connection between wilderness recreation and women’s everyday lives. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(4), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. (2015). Theorising outdoor recreation and ecology: Managing to enjoy ‘nature’?. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. W. (2007). Symbolism, experience, and the value of wilderness. International Journal of Wilderness, 13(1), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant, M. A. (1996). Attending to past outdoor recreation experiences: Symptom reporting and changes in affect. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1996.11949757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, H., & Rinehart, R. (2010). Alternative sport and affect: Non-representational theory examined. Sport in Society, 13(7–8), 1268–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430431003780278
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (1996). Spatial formations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trendafilova, S., & Ziakas, V. (2022). Sensitising the social-ecosystems of outdoor sport environments: A comprehensive framework. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.937765
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waitt, G., & Lane, R. (2007). Four-wheel drivescapes: Embodied understandings of the Kimberley. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2015). Methods in motion: Affecting heritage research. In C. Lury & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods: The happening of the social (pp. 97–118). Routledge. Wilderness Act of 1964, Pub. L. No. 88577, 78 Stat. 890 (1964) .88577, 78 Stat. 890 (1964) .
   Google Scholar
• Wildland Research Centre, University of California. (1962). Wilderness and recreation—a report on resources, values, and problems. Sierra Club.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, J. (2005). A single day’s walking: Narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. H., & Wieder, D. L. (1977). The diary: Diary-interview method. Urban Life, 5(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124167700500406
   Google Scholar