- See Bills of Lading Act 1855, s.1.
- Post, pp. 135–137, in relation to fob sales.
- International Rules for the Interpretation of Trade Terms, published by the International Chamber of Commerce.
- The problem is dealt with in Benjamin's Sale of Goods (2nd ed.) paras. 1828, et seq., although the treatment given there and in other works ignores the additional complication of the Factors Acts and s.24 and 25 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979: for example a conflict of claims might arise between a buyer from an unpaid fob seller in possession of the documents of title and a person who claims title through the original purchaser of the goods to which those documents relate.
- High Court, Queens Bench Division, November 3, 1983 (unreported).
- (1881) 7 App.Cas 591 at p. 605.
- See Sanders Bros. v. Maclean (1883) 11 Q.B.D. 327.
- For example, under s. 12 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979.
- See s.1, Bills of Lading Act 1855.
- See e.g. The “Irene's Success” [1982] 1 All E.R. 218.
- See for example International Accounting Standard No. 10 and United Kingdom and Irish Accounting Standard No. 18.
- But note Hague—Visby Rules—IV bis which provides “The defences and limits of liability provided for in these Rules shall apply… whether the action can be founded in contract or tort.”
- See Lickbarrow v. Mason (1794) 5 T.R. 683.
Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law
Volume 2, 1984 - Issue 2