Cross-media advertising strategies and brand attitude: the role of cognitive load

References

• Alonso Dos Santos, M., and F. Calabuig Moreno. 2018. Assessing the effectiveness of sponsorship messaging: Measuring the impact of congruence through electroencephalogram. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship 19, no. 1: 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell, R., M. Gorton, J. Sauer, P. Bottomley, and J. White. 2016. Don’t distract me when I’m media multitasking: Toward a theory for raising advertising recall and recognition. Journal of Advertising 45, no. 2: 198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H. and K. King. 2021. The effect of media multitasking on ad memory: the moderating role of program-induced engagement and brand familiarity. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 7: 994–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhi, F., A.J. Rohm, and F. Sultan. 2010. Tuning in and tuning out: Media multitasking among young consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 9, no. 4: 316–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuckels, E., S. De Jans, V. Cauberghe, and L. Hudders. 2021. Keeping up with media multitasking: An eye-tracking study among children and adults to investigate the impact of media multitasking behavior on switching frequency, advertising attention, and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising 50, no. 2: 197–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel, S.A, and J. Gips. 2014. Media Multitasking and Visual Attention: Switch Triggers in Context and Content, in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. J. Cotte, Stacy, W., and Duluth, MN, 146-150. Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, M., A.S. Krishen, E. Anlamlier, and O. Berezan. 2022. Fear of missing out in the digital age: The role of social media satisfaction and advertising engagement. Psychology & Marketing 39, no. 4: 683–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., and H. Bilandzic. 2008. Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory 18, no. 2: 255–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., and E. Thorson. 2023. Media multitasking, counterarguing, and brand attitude: Testing the mediation effects of advertising attention and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior 139: 107544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., and E. Thorson. 2004. Television and web advertising synergies. Journal of Advertising 33, no. 2: 75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinchanachokchai, S., B.R. Duff, and S. Sar. 2015. The effect of multitasking on time perception, enjoyment, and ad evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior 45: 185–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K.W., J. Altarriba, and M. Popiel. 2015. Mental juggling: When does multitasking impair reading comprehension? The Journal of General Psychology 142, no. 2: 90–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G. 1999. Research into cognitive load theory and instructional design at UNSW. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Cuve, H.C., J. Stojanov, X. Roberts-Gaal, C. Catmur, and G. Bird. 2022. Validation of gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle. Behavior Research Methods 54, no. 2: 1027–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debue, N., and C. Van De Leemput. 2014. What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, X., and H. Li. 2018. Does online media sequence matter in product marketing? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 28: 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, J.W.P, and S. Dunwoody. 2001. User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? Learning from the web versus print. Communication Research 28, no. 1: 48–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facebook, I.Q. 2017. Mobile and TV: Between the Screens. https://www.facebook.com/business/news/insights/mobile-and-tv-between-the-screens/ (accessed April 26, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Flores, W., J.C.V. Chen, and W.H. Ross. 2014. The effect of variations in banner ad, type of product, website context, and language of advertising on internet users’ attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior 31: 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garaus, M., U. Wagner, and A.M. Bäck. 2017. The effect of media multitasking on advertising message effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing 34, no. 2: 138–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, M., and H. Reisinger. 2022. Don’t lose your product in story translation: How product–story link in narrative advertisements increases persuasion. Journal of Advertising 51, no. 2: 188–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J.H, and X.P. Kotval. 1999. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 24, no. 6: 631–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guitart, I.A., G. Hervet, and D. Hildebrand. 2019. Using eye-tracking to understand the impact of multitasking on memory for banner ads: The role of attention to the ad. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 1: 154–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. 2013. Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R. 2009. Emotional engagement: How television builds big brands at low attention. Journal of Advertising Research 49, no. 1: 62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y. and S.H. Jeong. 2021. The role of user control in media multitasking effects. Media Psychology 24, no. 1: 79–108.
   Google Scholar
• Jaikumar, S. 2019. How do consumers choose sellers In E-Marketplaces?: The role of display price And sellers’ review volume. Journal of Advertising Research 59, no. 2: 232–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, S.H, and Y. Hwang. 2016. Media multitasking effects on cognitive vs. attitudinal outcomes: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research 42, no. 4: 599–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, S.H, and Y. Hwang. 2012. Does multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? Effects of multitasking on comprehension and counterarguing. Journal of Communication 62, no. 4: 571–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., S.J.G. Ahn, E.S. Kwon, and L.N. Reid. 2017. TV advertising engagement as a state of immersion and presence. Journal of Business Research 76: 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B.K., J. Choi, and C.J. Wakslak. 2019. The image realism effect: The effect of unrealistic product images in advertising. Journal of Advertising 48, no. 3: 251–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., M.Y.C. Yim, E. Kim, and W. Reeves. 2021. Exploring the optimized social advertising strategy that can generate consumer engagement with green messages on social media. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 15, no. 1: 30–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutner, D., C. Leopold, and E. Sumfleth. 2009. Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior 25, no. 2: 284–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., J. Lee, and T. Robertson. 2011. Reading while watching video: The effect of video content on reading comprehension and media multitasking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research 45, no. 2: 183–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., L. Lin, and T. Robertson. 2012. The impact of media multitasking on learning. Learning, Media and Technology 37, no. 1: 94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lwin, M.O, and M. Morrin. 2012. Scenting movie theatre commercials: The impact of scent and pictures on brand evaluations and ad recall. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 11, no. 3: 264–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macias, W. 2003. A preliminary structural equation model of comprehension and persuasion of interactive advertising brand web sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising 3, no. 2: 36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Malin, H. 2015. Arts participation as a context for youth purpose. Studies in Art Education 56, no. 3: 268–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margariti, K., L. Hatzithomas, C. Boutsouki, and Y. Zotos. 2022. Α path to our heart: Visual metaphors and “white” space in advertising aesthetic pleasure. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 4: 731–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick, D.G. 1992. Levels of subjective comprehension in advertising processing and their relations to ad perceptions, attitudes, and memory. Journal of Consumer Research 18, no. 4: 411–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, P., and S. Ratneshwar. 2015. Did you get it? Factors influencing subjective comprehension of visual metaphors in advertising. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 3: 232–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen. 2022. What fans want: The 2022 world football report. https://www.nielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/07/Nielsen-World-Football-Report-2022.pdf (accessed 26 April, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen. 2018. Nearly Half Of All Available Time Now Spent With Media. https://www.insideradio.com/free/nielsen-nearly-half-of-all-available-time-now-spent-with-media/article_7b988596-fddd-11e8-a4ec-9795e181ae0d.html/(accessed 30 September, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Pittman, M., and E. Haley. 2023. Cognitive load and social media advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising 23, no. 1: 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C.A., J.L. Swasy, D.W. Russell, and L. Engel. 2017. Eye-tracking evidence that happy faces impair verbal message comprehension: The case of health warnings in direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical television commercials. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 1: 82–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap, G., M. Kleemans, and A. Van Cauwenberge. 2018. Second screening for news: Effects of presentation on information processing and program liking. Computers in Human Behavior 84: 76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, C.M. 2019. A new mobile data driven message strategy called synced advertising: Conceptualization, implications, and future directions. Annals of the International Communication Association 43, no. 1: 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Segijn, C.M. 2016. Second screen advertising: A typology of multiscreening. In advertising in new formats and media. eds. P. De Pelsmacker, 77–96. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Segijn, C.M, and H.A. Voorveld. 2021. A first step in unraveling synced advertising effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 1: 124–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, C.M, and M. Eisend. 2019. A meta-analysis into multiscreening and advertising effectiveness: Direct effects, moderators, and underlying mechanisms. Journal of Advertising 48, no. 3: 313–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, C.M., H.A. Voorveld, and E.G. Smit. 2016. The underlying mechanisms of multiscreening effects. Journal of Advertising 45, no. 4: 391–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, C.M., H.A. Voorveld, and E.G. Smit. 2017. How related multiscreening could positively affect advertising outcomes. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 4: 455–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, C.M., H.A. Voorveld, and K.A. Vakeel. 2021. The role of ad sequence and privacy concerns in personalized advertising: An eye-tracking study into synced advertising effects. Journal of Advertising 50, no. 3: 320–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, C.M., H.A. Voorveld, L. Vandeberg, and E.G. Smit. 2017. The battle of the screens: Unraveling attention allocation and memory effects when multiscreening. Human Communication Research 43, no. 2: 295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K.B, and C. Doherty. 2001. Re-weaving the web: Integrating print and online communications. Journal of Interactive Marketing 15, no. 2: 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds, L., S. Bogomolova, R. Kennedy, M. Nenycz‐Thiel, and S. Bellman. 2020. A dual‐process model of how incorporating audio‐visual sensory cues in video advertising promotes active attention. Psychology & Marketing 37, no. 8: 1057–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. 2021. Number of adult simultaneous internet and TV users in the United States from 2018 to 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/783461/simultaneous-internet-and-tv-users-usa/ (accessed 30 September, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Sun, S., B. Wojdynski, M.T. Binford, and C. Ramachandran. 2022. How multitasking during video content decreases ad effectiveness: The roles of task relevance, video involvement, and visual attention. Journal of Promotion Management 28, no. 1: 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Tinuiti. 2018. Paid search efforts synced with TV ads to boost donations for national non-profit. https://tinuiti.com/case-study/paid-search-efforts-synced-with-tv-ads-to-boost-donations-for-national-non-profit/ (accessed April 26, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Theodorakioglou, F., L. Hatzithomas, and C. Boutsouki. 2023. The impact of sequential versus simultaneous media exposure on online advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications 29, no. 2: 101–17.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cauwenberge, A., G. Schaap, and R. Van Roy. 2014. TV no longer commands our full attention: Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news. Computers in Human Behavior 38: 100–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeberg, L., J.M. Murre, H.A. Voorveld, and E.G. Smit. 2015. Dissociating explicit and implicit effects of cross-media advertising. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 5: 744–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H.A.M., P.C. Neijens, and E.G. Smit. 2011. Opening the black box: Understanding cross-media effects. Journal of Marketing Communications 17, no. 2: 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H.A., P.C. Neijens, and E.G. Smit. 2012. The interacting role of media sequence and product involvement in cross-media campaigns. Journal of Marketing Communications 18, no. 3: 203–216.
   Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H.A.M, and S. Valkenburg. 2013. Cross-Media synergy: Exploring the role of the integration of ads in Cross-Media campaigns. In Vol IV of advances in advertising research. eds. S. Rosenberg, M. Dahlen, and S. Okazaki, 187–200. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H.A. and S.M. Valkenburg. 2015. The fit factor: The role of fit between ads in understanding cross-media synergy. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 3: 185–195.
   Google Scholar
• Wigboldus, D.H., J.W. Sherman, H.L. Franzese, and A.V. Knippenberg. 2004. Capacity and comprehension: Spontaneous stereotyping under cognitive load. Social Cognition 22, no. 3: 292–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WYSE Travel Confederation. 2021. Facts and stats. https://www.wysetc.org/about-us/facts-and-stats/
   Google Scholar