A network approach to teachers’ interactional management in whole-class discussions

References

• Alexander, R. 2020. A Dialogic Teaching Companion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. (2009). “Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks.” International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bokhove, C. 2018. “Exploring Classroom Interaction with Dynamic Social Network Analysis.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 41 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/1743727x.2016.1192116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. 2005. “Centrality and Network Flow.” Social Networks 27 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. 1988. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books .
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, C., C. T. Butts, D. McFarland, and P. Smyth. 2013. “Hierarchical Models for Relational Event Sequences.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 57 (6): 297–309. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2013.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., and F. R. Contant. 2002. “Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom.” Cognition and Instruction 20 (4): 399–483. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1978. “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1 (3): 215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frøytlog, J. I. J., and I. Rasmussen. 2020. “The Distribution and Productivity of whole-class Dialogues: Exploring the Potential of Microblogging.” International Journal of Educational Research 99: 101501. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruchterman, T. M. J., and E. M. Reingold. 1991. “Graph Drawing by force-directed Placement.” Software: Practice and Experience 21 (11): 1129–1164. doi:10.1002/spe.4380211102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunspan, D. Z., B. L. Wiggins, and S. M. Goodreau. 2014. “Understanding Classrooms through Social Network Analysis: A Primer for Social Network Analysis in Education Research.” CBE Life Sciences Education 13 (2): 167–179. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-08-0162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., N. Mercer, and M. Vrikki. 2020. “Coding Classroom Dialogue: Methodological Considerations for Researchers.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 25: 100404. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., S. Rojas-Drummond, R. Higham, A. M. Márquez, F. Maine, R. M. Ríos, R. García-Carrión, O. Torreblanca, and M. J. Barrera. 2016. “Developing a Coding Scheme for Analysing Classroom Dialogue across Educational Contexts.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 9: 16–44. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., and M. Abedin. 2013. “Classroom Dialogue: A Systematic Review across Four Decades of Research.” Cambridge Journal of Education 43 (3): 325–356. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., S. Hennessy, N. Mercer, M. Vrikki, and L. Wheatley. 2019. “Teacher–student Dialogue during Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes?” Journal of the Learning Sciences 28 (4–5): 462–512. doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kershner, R., S. Hennessy, R. Wegerif, and A. Ahmed. 2020. Research Methods for Educational Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., and D. Wray. 2002. Classroom Interaction and Social Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P., and E. G. Cohen. 1999. “Peer Status in the Middle School: A Natural Treatment for Unequal Participation.” Social Psychology of Education 3 (3): 193–214. doi:10.1023/A:1009609126635.
   Google Scholar
• Mameli, C., E. Mazzoni, and L. Molinari. 2015. “Patterns of Discursive Interactions in Primary Classrooms: An Application of Social Network Analysis.” Research Papers in Education 30 (5): 546–566. doi:10.1080/02671522.2015.1027727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, D. 2001. “Student Resistance: How the Formal and Informal Organization of Classrooms Facilitate Everyday Forms of Student Defiance.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (3): 612–678. doi:10.1086/338779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and L. Dawes. 2014. “The Study of Talk between Teachers and Students, from the 1970s until the 2010s.” Oxford Review of Education 40 (4): 430–445. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.934087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., R. Wegerif, and L. Major, Eds. 2019. The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., C. O’Connor, and L. Resnick. 2008. “Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (4): 283–297. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., and P. H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., and G. Wells. 2000. “What’s the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue?’ an Investigation of teacher-student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics 21 (3): 376–406. doi:10.1093/applin/21.3.376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., A. Gamoran, S. Zeiser, and D. A. Long. 2003. “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Process 35 (2): 135–198. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3502_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., and D. Lombardi. 2015. “Coding Classroom Interactions for Collective and Individual Engagement.” Educational Psychologist 50 (1): 70–83. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.1001891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2017. Social Network Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlacek, M., and K. Sedova. 2017. “How Many are Talking? The Role of Collectivity in Dialogic Teaching.” International Journal of Educational Research 85: 99–108. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeide, J., and A. Johnson. 2020. “Examining Preservice Teachers’ Narratives of Teaching Dialogically.” Teaching and Teacher Education 87: 102946. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrikki, M., L. Wheatley, C. Howe, S. Hennessy, and N. Mercer. 2018. “Dialogic Practices in Primary School Classrooms.” Language and Education 33 (1): 85–100. doi:10.1080/09500782.2018.1509988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, C., and M. González-Howard. 2018. “Studying Discourse as Social Interaction: The Potential of Social Network Analysis for Discourse Studies.” Educational Researcher 47 (6): 375–383. doi:10.3102/0013189x18777741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511605895.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G., and R. Mejia-Arauz. 2006. “Dialogue in the Classroom.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (3): 379–428. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar