A Novel Morphology-Based Naming Therapy for People with Aphasia

References

• Alon, I. (1996). HaIvrit HaKtuva HaBilti Menukedet [The unpunctuated written Hebrew]. Ben Gurion University.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, B. E., Müller, N., & Penn, C. (2016). Facilitation effects of cueing techniques in two Sesotho speakers with anomia. Speech, Language and Hearing, 19(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2016.1155817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardila, A. (2010). A Review of conduction aphasia. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2010 10 :6, 10(6), 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11910-010-0142-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar-Sharabi, L. (2014). The storage of morphologically complex words - derived and inflected: Evidence from aphasia. In Communication Sciences and Disorders : Vol. MA. University of Haifa.
   Google Scholar
• Barnay, J. L., Wauquiez, G., Bonnin-Koang, H. Y., Anquetil, C., Pérennou, D., Piscicelli, C., Lucas-Pineau, B., Muja, L., le Stunff, E., de Boissezon, X., Terracol, C., Rousseaux, M., Bejot, Y., Binquet, C., Antoine, D., Devilliers, H., & Benaim, C. (2014). Feasibility of the cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in aphasic left hemispheric stroke patients. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(6–7), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.REHAB.2014.05.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bar-On, A., Dattner, E., & Braun-Peretz, O. (2019). Resolving homography: The role of post-homograph context in reading aloud ambiguous sentences in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(6), 1405–1420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barouch, B., Weiss, Y., Katzir, T., & Bitan, T. (2022). Neural processing of morphology during reading in children. Neuroscience, 485, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROSCIENCE.2021.12.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartha, L., & Benke, T. (2003). Acute conduction aphasia: An analysis of 20 cases. Brain and Language, 85(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00502-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso, A., Marangolo, P., Piras, F., & Galluzzi, C. (2001). Acquisition of new “words” in normal subjects: A suggestion for the treatment of anomia. Brain and Language, 77(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1006/BRLN.2000.2422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16(4), 161. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11065-006-9013-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Fairbrother, M., & Jones, K. (2019). Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice. Quality and Quantity, 53(2), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11135-018-0802-X/FIGURES/2
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Arie, T., Nagar, K., Bergerzon-Biton, O., & Ovad, D. (2015). Hashpa’at Tipul BeShitat CIAT Al Cholei Aphasia Globalit Dovrei Ivrit [The effect of constraint induced aphasia therapy (CIAT) in native Hebrew-speaking patients with global aphasia]. DASH: The Israeli Journal of Language, Speech and Hearing Disorders, 34, 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (2007). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42(4), 693–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401245
   Google Scholar
• Berman, R. A. (1982). Verb-pattern alternation - the interface of morphology, syntax and semantics in Hebrew child language. Journal of Child Language, 9(1), 169–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Greenwood, A., Grassly, J., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., & Howard, D. (2013). Aphasia rehabilitation: Does generalisation from anomia therapy occur and is it predictable? A case series study. Cortex, 49(9), 2345–2357. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CORTEX.2013.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, M. E. L., & Bak, T. H. (2011). The languages of aphasia research: Bias and diversity. Aphasiology, 25(12), 1451–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.624165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bick, A., Frost, R., & Goelman, G. (2010). Imaging implicit morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(9), 1955–1969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bick, A., Goelman, G., & Frost, R. (2008). Neural correlates of morphological processes in Hebrew. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann, B., Blanken, G., & Nickels, L. (2010). The representation of homophones: Evidence from remediation. Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 1115–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000545
   Google Scholar
• Biran, M., & Friedmann, N. (2004). SHEMESH: Naming a Hundred Objects. Tel Aviv University. https://www.tau.ac.il/~naamafr/shemesh.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biran, M., & Friedmann, N. (2005). From phonological paraphasias to the structure of the phonological output lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(4), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960400005813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biran, M., Novogrodsky, R., Harel, E., Gil, M., & Maimoni Bloch, A. (2017). Ifyunei Likuyim Beshium Begil HaGan: Ma Nitan Lilmod Mitauyot Hashiyum Shel Yeladim Lekuyey Safa? [Characteristics of naming errors in kindergarten: What we can infer from naming errors of children with language impairments?]. Language-Brain, 12, 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Bitan, T., Weiss, Y., Katzir, T., & Truzman, T. (2020). Morphological decomposition compensates for imperfections in phonological decoding. Neural evidence from typical and dyslexic readers of an opaque orthography. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 130, 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CORTEX.2020.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2004). Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(3), 236–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2015). Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: What’s in a name? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17(6), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1310/TSR1706-411
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, M., & Coelho, C. A. (1995). Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0404.94
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer, M., & Curtin, J. J. (2018). Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/MET0000159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. (pp. 187–212). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., McHugh, R. E., & Boyle, M. (2000). Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: A replication. Aphasiology, 14(2), 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crivelli, D., Angelillo, M. T., Grippa, E., Colucci, A., Nardulli, R., & Balconi, M. (2018). When is a novel psychometric measure needed? A preliminary analysis regarding the Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients (CASP) battery compared with MMSE and MoCA. Applied Neuropsychology: Adults, 25(5), 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1320556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Nozari, N., & Oppenheim, G. M. (2014). Word production: Behavioral and computational considerations. In M. Goldrick, V. S. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 88–104). Oxford University Press Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199735471.013.014
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, R., & Riccardi, N. (2021). Cognitive neuroscience of language. In J. R. Taylor & X. Wen (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Dotan, D., & Friedmann, N. (2015). Steps towards understanding the phonological output buffer and its role in the production of numbers, morphemes, and function words. Cortex, 63(1066), 317–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromi, E., & Berman, R. A. (1982). A morphemic measure of early language development: Data from modern Hebrew. Journal of Child Language, 9(2), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A., & Kiran, S. (2006). Effect of semantic naming treatment on crosslinguistic generalization in bilingual aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(4), 729–748. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/053)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstratiadou, E. A., Papathanasiou, I., Holland, R., Archonti, A., & Hilari, K. (2018). A systematic review of semantic feature analysis therapy studies for aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(5), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-16-0330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Hong, J. (2010). Effect displays in R for multinomial and proportional-ddds logit models: Extensions to the effects package. Journal of Statistical Software, 32(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/JSS.V032.I01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridler, N., Rosen, K., Menahemi-Falkov, M., Herzberg, O., Lev, A., Kaplan, D., Feldman, Y., Grosberg, D., Hildesheimer, M., & Shani, M. (2012). Tele-rehabilitation therapy vs. face-to-face therapy for aphasic patients. Etelemed.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2006). BAFI: Bateriya LeHa’arachat Bafer Pelet Fonologi [BAFI: Assessment battery of phonological output buffer]. Tel Aviv University.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2000). Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 26(3), 751–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28(8), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 23(4), 829–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geranmayeh, F., Brownsett, S. L. E., & Wise, R. J. S. (2014). Task-induced brain activity in aphasic stroke patients: what is driving recovery? Brain, 137(10), 2632–2648. https://doi.org/10.1093/BRAIN/AWU163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gil, M., & Edelstein, C. (). (2001). Hebrew version of the PALPA test. Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, M., & Goral, M. (2004). Nonparallel recovery in bilingual aphasia: Effects of language choice, language proficiency, and treatment. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(2), 191–219.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, N., Meier, E. L., Johnson, J. P., & Kiran, S. (2019). Nonlinguistic cognitive factors predict treatment-induced recovery in chronic poststroke aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(7), 1251–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APMR.2018.12.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goral, M., Obler, L. K., & Shimron, J. (2003). Root-morpheme processing during word recognition in Hebrew speakers across the adult life span. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 28, 223–242.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Y., Bahrani, M., Billot, A., Lai, S., Braun, E. J., Varkanitsa, M., Bighetto, J., Rapp, B., Parrish, T. B., Caplan, D., Thompson, C. K., Kiran, S., & Betke, M. (2020). A machine learning approach for predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery: A pilot study. Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. https://doi.org/10.1145/3389189
   Google Scholar
• Gvion, A., & Biran, M. (2023). An access deficit or a deficit in the phonological representations themselves: What can we learn from naming errors? Under Review in Cognitive Neuropsychology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gvion, A., & Friedmann, N. (2012). Phonological short-term memory in conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 26(3–4), 579–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.643759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, L., Weiss, Y., Katzir, T., & Bitan, T. (2018). Orthographic transparency enhances morphological segmentation in children reading Hebrew words. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E. (1998). Treatment of naming disorders: New issues regarding old therapies. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4(6), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561779846613X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Coltheart, M., & Lesser, R. (1992). PALPA: Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia. Introduction, auditory processing, reading & spelling (Issue v. 1). Erlbaum. https://books.google.co.il/books?id=K_a2lwEACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery. New York: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Kang, Y., Lee, H.-Y., Kim, J., & Yoon, J. H. (2019). Changes in naming and cognitive abilities as the effects of semantic feature analysis treatment in middle-aged and older adults. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 24(1), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.12963/CSD.18582
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Johnson, L. (2008). Semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Evidence from well-defined categories. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 17, 389–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(4), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/061)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoph, M. I. N., Lind, M., & Simonsen, H. G. (2015). Semantic feature analysis targeting verbs in a quadrilingual speaker with aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(12), 1473–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1049583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolan, L., Leikin, M., & Zwitserlood, P. (2011). Morphological processing and lexical access in speech production in Hebrew: Evidence from picture–word interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraizer, V., & Novogrodsky, R. (2012). The effect of morpho-phonological cues on words retrieval of children with lexical-SLI. DASH: The Israeli Journal of Language, Speech and Hearing Disorders, 31, 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensson, J., Behrns, I., & Saldert, C. (2015). Effects on communication from intensive treatment with semantic feature analysis in aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.973359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2005). Syllable frequency effect in speech production: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNEUROLING.2004.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2010). Is there a syllable frequency effect in aphasia or in apraxia of speech or both? Aphasiology, 22(11), 1191–1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701820469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M. A., Snell, C., Fillingham, J. K., Conroy, P., & Sage, K. (2010). Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: Both language and cognitive status are key predictors. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010903237875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, S. P., Wong, W., Sung, F., & Hon, J. (2006). A study of semantic treatment of three Chinese anomic patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16(6), 601–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010543000046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledorze, G., & Brassard, C. (1995). A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the who model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology, 9(3), 239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V. (2023). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, C., Rochon, E., & Laird, L. (2008). Treating naming impairments in aphasia: Findings from a phonological components analysis treatment. Aphasiology, 22(9), 923–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701831474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerman, A., Goral, M., & Obler, L. K. (2022). Rehabilitating an attrited language in a bilingual person with aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2022.2052966/SUPPL_FILE/ICLP_A_2052966_SM6769.PDF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. A. (2019). interactions: Comprehensive, user-Friendly toolkit for probing interactions. https://cran.r-project.org/package=interactions
   Google Scholar
• Lowell, S., Beeson, P. M., & Holland, A. L. (1995). The efficacy of a semantic cueing procedure on naming performance of adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0404.109
   Google Scholar
• Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JML.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccarthy, R., & Warrington, E. K. (1984). A two-route model of speech production evidence from aphasia. Brain, 107, 463–485. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/107/2/463/291700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Amitrano, A., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The treatment of anomia resulting from output lexical damage: Analysis of two cases. Brain and Language, 52(1), 150–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moons, K. G. M., Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Grobbee, D. E., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ, 338(7706), 1317–1320. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.B375
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A. (2002). Theoretical and methodological issues in the cognitive neuropsychology of spoken word production. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quique, Y. M., Evans, W. S., & Dickey, M. W. (2018). Acquisition and generalization responses in aphasia naming treatment: A meta-analysis of semantic feature analysis outcomes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(1S), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0155
   Google Scholar
• Ravid, D., & Malenky, A. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: a developmental study. First Language, 21(61), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272370102106102
   Google Scholar
• Raymer, A. M., Thompson, C. K., Jacobs, B., & Le Grand, H. R. (1993). Phonological treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Model-based generalization analysis. Aphasiology, 7(1), 27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, J., Marshall, J., Pring, T., & Chiat, S. (1998). Phonological naming therapy in jargon aphasia: Positive but paradoxical effects. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4(6), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617798466153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenheck, N., Biran, M., Ben-Or, G., & Bar-Haim Erez, O. (2021). Cognitive assessment for stroke patients (CASP): Hebrew version. Ezra Le-Marpe Rehabilitation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Shimron, J., & Sivan, T. (1994). Reading proficiency and orthography evidence from Hebrew and English. Language Learning, 44(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-1770.1994.TB01447.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simic, T., Chambers, C., Bitan, T., Stewart, S., Goldberg, D., Laird, L., Leonard, C., & Rochon, E. (2020). Mechanisms underlying anomia treatment outcomes. Journal of Communication Disorders, 88, 106048. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOMDIS.2020.106048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroker, N. (1997). Hebrew Western Aphasia Battery. Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Spielmann, K., Durand, E., Marcotte, K., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2016). Maladaptive plasticity in aphasia: Brain activation maps underlying verb retrieval errors. Neural Plasticity, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4806492
   Google Scholar
• Tam, M. H. C., & Lau, D. K. Y. (2019). Modified semantic feature analysis for anomia: A single case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(10–11), 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2019.1594382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedemann, J. (2012). Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. Lrec, 2012, 2214–2218.
   Google Scholar
• van Hees, S., Mcmahon, K., Angwin, A., de Zubicaray, G., Read, S., & Copland, D. A. (2014). A functional MRI study of the relationship between naming treatment outcomes and resting state functional connectivity in post-stroke aphasia. Human Brain Mapping, 35(8), 3919–3931. https://doi.org/10.1002/HBM.22448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voeten, C. C. (2023). buildmer: Stepwise elimination and term reordering for mixed-effects regression. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=buildmer
   Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Linebaugh, C. W., Doyle, P. J., Martinez, A. L., Kalinyak-Fliszar, M., & Spencer, K. A. (2001). Effects of two cueing treatments on lexical retrieval in aphasic speakers with different levels of deficit. Aphasiology, 15(10–11), 933–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., Whitworth, A., & Morris, J. (2015). Is it time to stop “fishing”? A review of generalisation following aphasia intervention. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1027169, 29(11), 1240–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1027169
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, R. W., & Rapp, B. (2019). Statistical analysis in Small-N Designs: Using linear mixed-effects modeling for evaluating intervention effectiveness. Aphasiology, 33(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1454884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisenburn, B., & Mahoney, K. (2009). A meta-analysis of word-finding treatments for aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(11), 1338–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902732745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar