Understanding people-centered planning practice in Europe: an institutionalist comparison between urban development projects in Vienna and Helsingborg

References

• Ahn, B., Friesenecker, M., Kazepov, Y., & Brandl, J. (2023) How context matters: Challenges of localizing participatory budgeting for climate change adaptation in Vienna, Urban Planning, 8(1), pp. 399–413. doi:10.17645/up.v8i1.6067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2010) More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(6), pp. 1115–1127. doi:10.1068/b36068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. (2020) Transforming the relational dynamics of urban governance: How social innovation research can create a trajectory for learning and change, Urban Studies, 57(14), pp. 2868–2884. doi:10.1177/0042098019889290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., & Solly, A. (2021) Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: A European typology, European Planning Studies, 29(1), pp. 181–200. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, I., Griggs, S., & Sullivan, H. (2014) Situating the local in the neoliberalisation and transformation of urban governance, Urban Studies, 51(15), pp. 3129–3146. doi:10.1177/0042098014549292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. (2019) Verstedelijking verklaard: Het spel, de spelers en de regels-oratie (Utrecht: Inaugural speech, Utrecht University).
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, R., Sobhani, A., & Meijers, E. (2021) The cities we need: Towards an urbanism guided by human needs satisfaction, Urban Studies, 59, pp. 2638–2659. doi:10.1177/00420980211045571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, R. L. (2003) 12 social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development, in: R. Forrest & J. Lee (Eds) Housing and Social Change: East-West Perspectives, pp. 221–239 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• City of Helsingborg. (2011) Inriktningsbeslut och direktiv angaende framtida förändring och utveckling av Drottninghög Dnr 00594/2011, Helsingborg: City of Helsingborg.
   Google Scholar
• City of Helsingborg. (2012) Drottninghög - Planprogram för Drottninghög (Helsingborg: City of Helsingborg).
   Google Scholar
• City of Helsingborg. (2018) Strukturbild DrottningHög (Helsingborg).
   Google Scholar
• City of Helsingborg. (2022) H22 City Expo (Helsingborg: Stibo Complete).
   Google Scholar
• City of Vienna. (2005) STEP 05 Urban Development Plan Vienna 2005 (Vienna: Vienna City Adminstration).
   Google Scholar
• City of Vienna. (2014) STEP 2025 Urban Development Plan Vienna (Vienna: Vienna City Adminstration).
   Google Scholar
• City of Vienna. (2018) Aspern Die Seestadt Wiens - Fortschreibung Masterplan 2017 (Vienna: Vienna City Adminstration).
   Google Scholar
• City of Vienna. (2019a) Aufgabenbeschreibung - Stadtteilmanagement im Rahmen der Wiener Gebietsbetreuung Stadterneuerung.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vienna. (2019b) Besondere Vertragsbestimmungen - Vergabe Einer Geistigen Dienstleistung für das Stadtteilmanagement Seestadt Aspern.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vienna. (2019c) Verfahrensbestimmungen - Vergabe Einer Geistigen Dienstleistung für das Stadtteilmanagement Seestadt Aspern.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vienna. (2022) Smart Climate City Strategy Vienna - Our Way to Becoming a Model Climate City (Vienna: Vienna City Adminstration).
   Google Scholar
• Colantonio, A. (2011) Social sustainability: Exploring the linkages between research, policy and practice, in: C. C. Jaeger, J. D. Tabara, & J. Jaeger (Eds) European Research on Sustainable Development, pp. 35–57 (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. H., & McGinnis, M. D. (2017) Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy: A Framework for Policy Analysis, Vol. 3 (Maryland: Lexington Books).
   Google Scholar
• Dangschat, J. S., & Hamedinger, A. (2009) Planning culture in Austria–the case of Vienna, the unlike city, in: J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds) Planning Cultures in Europe, pp. 131–148 (Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Madanipour, A. (2015) Reconsidering Localism (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2012) Participatory governance: From theory to practice, in: D. Levi-Faur (Ed) The Oxford Handbook of Governance, pp. 457 (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Franz, Y., & Humer, A. (2021) EU cohesion policy: Towards grounded cities and regions, in: F. Sielker, D. Rauhut, & A. Humer (Eds) EU Cohesion Policy and Spatial Governance, pp. 216–229 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Getimis, P. (2012) Comparing spatial planning systems and planning cultures in Europe. The need for a multi-scalar approach, Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), pp. 25–40. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.659520
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society (California: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Grandel, T. G. (2021) “We are here for everyone”. Aspirations, tensions, and dilemmas in Vienna’s neighbourhood management, Master thesis, Technical University Wien, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. (2018) Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions: Interactive Approaches to Territorial Policy-Making Between Institutional Design and Institution-Building (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E., & Majoor, S. (2007) Innovative practices in large urban development projects: Conflicting frames in the quest for “new urbanity”, Planning Theory & Practice, 8(3), pp. 297–318. doi:10.1080/14649350701514637
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. (2009) Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementaries in the political economcy, British Journal of Political Science, 39(3), pp. 449–482. doi:10.1017/S0007123409000672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T., & Vidén, S. (2005) The million homes programme: A review of the great Swedish planning project, Planning Perspectives, 20(3), pp. 301–328. doi:10.1080/02665430500130233
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning, Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 30(9), pp. 1531–1546. doi:10.1068/a301531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1999) Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(2), pp. 111–121. doi:10.1177/0739456X9901900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2019) Developing a sociological institutional approach to analyzing instutional change in place governance, in: W. Salet (Ed) The Routledge Handbook of Institutions and Planning in Action, pp. 24–42 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hedman, E. (2008) A History of the Swedish System of Non-Profit Municipal Housing (Karlskrona: Swedish Board of Housing, Building and Planning).
   Google Scholar
• Helsingborgshem (n.d.) Drottninghög tillsammans – ett dialogprojekt (Helsingborg: City of Helsingborg).
   Google Scholar
• Hinterkörner, P., Lang, L., Collon, H., Kintisch, M., Mollay, U., & Schremmer, C. (2014) Vienna, Aspern Seestadt: Implementation Plan (Vienna: Transform).
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, C., & Basta, C. (2022) Are good intentions enough? Evaluating social sustainability in urban development projects through the capability approach, European Planning Studies, 32, pp. 1–22. doi:10.1080/09654313.2022.2136936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, C., Daamen, T. A., & Verdaas, C. (2021) Planning for urban social sustainability: Towards a human-centred operational approach, Sustainability, 13(16), pp. 9083. doi:10.3390/su13169083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadi, J., & Suitner, J. (2019) The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2022) Taking stock of what we know about large-scale urban development projects: A review of existing theoretical frameworks and case studies, Journal of Planning Literature, 38, pp. 171–186. doi:10.1177/08854122221097976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2009) Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Krisch, A., & Suitner, J. (2020) Aspern explained: How the discursive institutionalisation of infrastructure planning shaped north-eastern Vienna’s urban transformation, DisP-The Planning Review, 56(2), pp. 51–66. doi:10.1080/02513625.2020.1794126
   Google Scholar
• Leixnering, S., Meyer, R. E., & Polzer, T. (2020) Hybrid coordination of city organisations: The rule of people and culture in the shadow of structures, Urban Studies, 58(14), pp. 2933–2951. doi:10.1177/0042098020963854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2013) Why Institutions Matter: The New Institutionalism in Political Science (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2010) Rediscovering institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: Simon and Schuster).
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2011) The logic of appropriateness, in: R. E. Goodin (Ed) The Oxford Handbook of Political Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Moroni, S. (2010) An evolutionary theory of institutions and a dynamic approach to reform, Planning Theory, 9(4), pp. 275–297. doi:10.1177/1473095210368778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008) European spatial planning systems, social models and learning, DisP - The Planning Review, 44(172), pp. 35–47. doi:10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2013) Opening up the compendium: An evaluation of international comparative planning research methodologies, European Planning Studies, 21(10), pp. 1542–1561. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1991) Institutions, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), pp. 97–112. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy, A., & Hammer, E. (2007) Radical innovation in the era of liberal governance: The case of Vienna, European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), pp. 210–222. doi:10.1177/0969776407077738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions, Public Choice, 48(1), pp. 3–25. doi:10.1007/BF00239556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005) Doing institutional analysis digging deeper than markets and hierarchies, in: C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds) Handbook of New Institutional Economics, pp. 819–848 (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009) Understanding Institutional Diversity (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Paidakaki, A., & Lang, R. (2021) Uncovering social sustainability in housing systems through the lens of institutional capital: A study of two housing alliances in Vienna, Austria, Sustainability, 13(17), pp. 9726. doi:10.3390/su13179726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parés, M., Marti-Costa, M., & Blanco, I. (2014) Geographies of governance: How place matters in urban regeneration policies, Urban Studies, 51(15), pp. 3250–3267. doi:10.1177/0042098013513647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pojani, D., & Stead, D. (2018) Past, present and future of transit-oriented development in three European capital city-regions, in: Y. Shiftan & M. Kamargianni (Eds) Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, Vol. 1, pp. 93–118 (Cambridge: Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Polski, M. M., & Ostrom, E. (1999) An institutional framework for policy analysis and design, in: H. Cole & M. D. McGinnis (Eds) Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy, Vol. 3, pp. 13–48 (Maryland: Lexington Books).
   Google Scholar
• Rechnungshof (2013) Bericht des Rechnungshofes - Gebietsbetreuung Stadterneuerung der Stadt Wien (Vienna: Rechnungshof).
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W. (ed.) (2018) Institutions in action, in: The Routledge Handbook of Institutions and Planning in Action, pp. 3–23 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. (2019) Tailored polities in the shadow of the state’s hierarchy. The CLLD implementation and a future research agenda, European Planning Studies, 27(4), pp. 678–698. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1569595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M. R., & Keivani, R. (2017) Critical reflections on the theory and practice of social sustainability in the built environment – A meta-analysis, Local Environment, 22(12), pp. 1526–1545. doi:10.1080/13549839.2017.1379476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2017) New institutionalism and planning theory, in: M. Gunder, A. Mandanipour, & V. Watson (Eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, pp. 250–263 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Suitner, J. (2020) Vienna’s planning history: Periodizing stable phases of regulating urban development, 1820–2020, Planning Perspectives, 36(5), pp. 881–902. doi:10.1080/02665433.2020.1862700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Hurk, M., Mastenbroek, E., & Meijerink, S. (2014) Water safety and spatial development: An institutional comparison between the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Land Use Policy, 36, pp. 416–426. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Hurk, M., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2020) Contractual arrangements and entrepreneurial governance: Flexibility and leeway in urban regeneration projects, Urban Studies, 57(16), pp. 3217–3235. doi:10.1177/0042098019894277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Karnenbeek, L., & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2018) Playing by the rules? Analysing incremental urban developments, Land Use Policy, 72, pp. 402–409. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verga, P. L. (2017) Towards an inclusive and sustainable CLLD. Lessons from a neighbourhood management in Berlin. Lessons from a Neighbourhood Management in Berlin. Available at SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2947817 (accessed 21 May 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G., Gunn, S., & Brooks, E. (2017) Governing our neighbours: Participation and conflict in neighbourhood planning, Town Planning Review, 88(4), pp. 423–443. doi:10.3828/tpr.2017.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., Ersoy, A., van Bueren, E., & de Jong, M. (2022) Rules for the governance of transport and land use integration in high-speed railway station areas in China: The case of Lanzhou, Urban Policy and Research, 40(2), pp. 122–141. doi:10.1080/08111146.2022.2067843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wargent, M., & Parker, G. (2018) Re-imagining neighbourhood governance: The future of neighbourhood planning in England, Town Planning Review, 89(4), pp. 379–403. doi:10.3828/tpr.2018.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wien 3420 aspern Development AG (n.d.) Urban lab. Available at https://www.aspern-seestadt.at/en/business_hub/innovation__quality/urban_lab (accessed 10 May 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods) (London and Singapore: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Zakhour, S., & Metzger, J. (2018) From a “Planning-led regime” to a “Development-led regime”(and back again?): The role of municipal planning in the urban governance of Stockholm, DisP-The Planning Review, 54(4), pp. 46–58. doi:10.1080/02513625.2018.1562797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar