Are There Experimental Arguments Independent of Theories? In Defense of a Hackingian Approach to the Scientific Realism Debate

References

• Achinstein, P. 2002. “Is There a Valid Experimental Argument for Scientific Realism?” The Journal of Philosophy 99 (9): 470–495. https://doi.org/10.2307/3655684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay, J. 2019. “Going Local: A Defense of Methodological Localism about Scientific Realism.” Synthese 196 (2): 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1072-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashkin, A. 1970. “Acceleration and Trapping of Particles by Radiation Pressure.” Physical Review Letters 24 (4): 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashkin, A., and J. M. Dziedzic. 1987. “Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Viruses and Bacteria.” Science 235 (4795): 1517–1520. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3547653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashkin, A., J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, and S. Chu. 1986. “Observation of a Single-Beam Gradient Force Optical Trap for Dielectric Particles.” Optical Letters 11 (5): 288–290. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.11.000288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno, O. 2011. “Scientific Representation: A Long Journey from Pragmatics to Pragmatics.” Metascience 20: 423–428.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, O. 2018a. “Can Quantum Objects Be Tracked?” In Individuation, Process, and Scientific Practices, edited by O. Bueno, R.-L. Chen, and M. B. Fagan, 239–258. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, O. 2018b. “Empiricism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, edited by J. Saatsi, 151–163. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198247044.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, A. 1998. “Semirealism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3): 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00013-2.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, A. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R.-L. 2007. “The Structure of Experimentation and the Replication Degree: Reconsidering the Replication of Hertz’s Cathode Ray Experiment.” In Naturalized Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, edited by C. M. Mi, and R.-L. Chen, 129–149. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R.-L., and J. Hricko. 2021. “Experimental Individuation and Philosophical Retail Arguments.” Synthese 198 (3): 2313–2332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02207-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R.-L., and J. Hricko. 2023. “Experimental Criteria for Accessing Reality: Perrin’s Experimental Demonstration of Atoms and Molecules.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (1): 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-023-00517-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egg, M. 2016. “Expanding our grasp: Causal Knowledge and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (1): 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigler, D., and E. K. Schweizer. 1990. “Positioning Single Atoms with a Scanning Tunneling Microscope.” Nature 344 (6266): 524–526. https://doi.org/10.1038/344524a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S. 2013. “Doing Away with the No Miracles Argument.” In EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, edited by V. Karakostas, and D. Dieks, 141–151. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_12.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfert, A. 2003. “Manipulative Success and the Unreal.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (3): 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269859032000169451.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1985. “Do We See through a Microscope?” In Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraassen, edited by P. M. Churchland, and C. A. Hooker, 132–152. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1989. “Extragalactic Reality: The Case of Gravitational Lensing.” Philosophy of Science 56 (4): 555–581. https://doi.org/10.1086/289514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 2009. Scientific Reason. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. 2016. “What is Hacking’s Argument for Entity Realism?” Synthese 193 (3): 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0789-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobel Committee for Physics. 2018. “Groundbreaking Inventions in Laser Physics: Optical Tweezers and Generation of High-Intensity Ultra-Short Optical Pulses.” https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/10/advanced-physicsprize2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, T. T., S. R. Quake, D. E. Smith, and S. Chu. 1994. “Relaxation of a Single DNA Molecule Observed by Optical Microscopy.” Science 264 (5160): 822–826. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8171336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 2011. “Making Contact with Molecules: On Perrin and Achinstein.” In Philosophy of Science Matters: The Philosophy of Peter Achinstein, edited by G. J. Morgan, 177–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 1995. “Experimenting in the Natural Sciences: A Philosophical Approach.” In Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics, edited by Jed Z. Buchwald, 56–86. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner, R., and R. Pierson. 1995. “Hacking's Experimental Realism: An Untenable Middle Ground.” Philosophy of Science 62 (1): 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/289839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. 1994. “Hacking’s Experimental Realism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (3): 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1994.10717376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockmann, J. 1998. “Gravitational Lensing and Hacking’s Extragalactic Irreality.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (2): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698599808573589.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbottom, D. 2019. The Instrument of Science: Scientific Anti-Realism Revitalized. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saatsi, J. 2010. “Form-Driven vs. Content-Driven Arguments for Realism.” In New waves in philosophy of science, edited by P. D. Magnus, and J. Busch, 8–28. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shapere, D. 1993. “Discussion: Astronomy and Antirealism” Philosophy of Science 60 (1): 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/289722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, Bas C. 1985. “Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science.” In Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraassen, edited by P. M. Churchland, and C. A. Hooker, 245–305. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, Bas C. 2009. “The Perils of Perrin, in the Hands of Philosophers.” Philosophical Studies 143 (1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9319-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. D., H. Yin, R. Landick, J. Gelles, and S. M. Block. 1997. “Stretching DNA with Optical Tweezers.” Biophysical Journal 72 (3): 1335-1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78780-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar