Explanations by Constraint: Not Just in Physics

References

• Adlam, Emily. 2022. “Laws of Nature as Constraints.” Foundations of Physics 52 (1): 28 (1–41).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, David. 2015. After Physics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Holly. 2018. “A Pragmatist Challenge to Constraint Laws.” Metascience 27 (1): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-017-0251-5.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Menahem, Yemima. 2018. Causation in Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, Peter G. 1962. “The Special Theory of Relativity.” In Encyclopedia of Physics, Vol. 4, edited by S. Flügge, 109–202. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Harvey. 2022. “Do Symmetries ‘Explain’ Conservation Laws? The Modern Converse Noether Theorem vs. Pragmatism.” In The Philosophy and Physics of Noether’s Theorems: A Centenary Volume, edited by J. Read and N. J. Teh, 144–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Harvey, and Peter Holland. 2004. “Dynamical vs. Variational Symmetries: Understanding Noether’s First Theorem.” Molecular Physics 102 (11–12): 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970410001728807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Eddy Keming, and Sheldon Goldstein. 2022. “Governing Without a Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism About Laws of Nature.” In Rethinking the Concept of Law of Nature, edited by Yemima Ben-Menahem, 21–64. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Lynn, Kevin Watson, and Warren Maguire. 2013. “Special Issue on Phonological Mergers in English.” English Language and Linguistics 17 (2): 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674313000014.
   Google Scholar
• Denić, Milica, Shane Steinert-Threlkeld, and Jakub Szymanik. 2022. “Indefinite Pronouns Optimize the Simplicity/Informativeness Trade-Off.” Cognitive Science 46 (5): e13142. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earman, John. 1989. World Enough and Space-Time. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feynman, Richard. 1967. The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, Raymond. 2004. “Mergers, Near-Mergers and Phonological Interpretation.” In New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics, edited by Christian Kay, Carole Hough, and Irené Wotherspoon, 125–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, Charles, and Terry Regier. 2012. “Kinship Categories Across Languages Reflect General Communicative Principles.” Science 336 (6084): 1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, Simon, Monica Tamariz, Hannah Cornish, and Kenny Smith. 2015. “Compression and Communication in the Cultural Evolution of Linguistic Structure.” Cognition 141:87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2002. “Who's Afraid of Ceteris-Paribus Laws? Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Them.” Erkenntnis 57 (3): 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021546731582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2007. “Laws and Meta-Laws of Nature: Conservation Laws and Symmetries.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3): 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2009. Laws & Lawmakers. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2017. Because Without Cause. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2018. “Reply to My Critics: On Explanations by Constraint.” Metascience 27 (1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-017-0252-4.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2019. “Replies to Heron and Knox, Morrison, and Strevens.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (3): 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévy-Leblond, Jean-Marc. 1976. “One More Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations.” American Journal of Physics 44 (3): 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.10490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1983. “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4): 343–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408312341131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1986. Philosophical Papers: Volume II. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1999. “Humean Supervenience Debugged.” In Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, edited by David Lewis, 224–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mollica, Francis, and Steven Piantadosi. 2022. “Logical Word Learning: The Case of Kinship.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29 (3): 766–799. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02017-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, Margaret, Michael Strevens, John Heron, and Eleanor Knox. 2019. “Book Symposium on Because Without Cause.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (3): 720–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, Sam, Wolfgang Barth, Kyla Quinn, Simon Greenhill, Nicholas Evans, and Fiona Jordan. 2023. “Kin Against Kin: Internal Co-Selection and the Coherence of Kinship Typologies.” Biological Theory 16:176–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-021-00379-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, Sam, and Fiona Jordan. 2020. “No Universals in the Cultural Evolution of Kinship Terminology.” Evolutionary Human Sciences 2:e42 (1–14).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saatsi, Juha. 2018. “A Pluralist Account of Non-Causal Explanations in Science and Mathematics.” Metascience 27 (1): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-017-0249-z.
   Google Scholar
• Skow, Bradford. 2018. “Of Strawberries and Energy Conservation.” Metascience 27 (1): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-017-0250-6.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Erik. 2006. “Vowel Shifts and Mergers.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., edited by Keith Brown, 484–494. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Trudgill, Peter, Daniel Schrier, Daniel Long, and Jeffrey Williams. 2003. “On the Reversibility of Mergers: /W/, /V/ and Evidence from Lesser-Known Englishes.” Folia Linguistica Historica 24:23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, Loring W. 2013. “Remembering Raoul Bott (1923–2005).” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 60 (4): 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti977.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, Steven. 2004. “The Making of the Standard Model.” European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields 34 (1): 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2004-01761-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigner, Eugene. 1964. “Symmetry and Conservation Laws.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 51 (5): 956–965. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.51.5.956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigner, Eugene. 1972. “Events, Laws of Nature, and Invariance Principles.” In Nobel Lectures: Physics, 1963–1970, 6–19. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Jim, Barry Loewer, John Carroll, and Marc Lange. 2011. “Counterfactuals All the Way Down?” Metascience 20 (1): 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-010-9437-9.
   Google Scholar
• Zee, A. 1986. Fearful Symmetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar