Predicting pneumatic conveyability and flowability of fly ash using bulk property characterization

References

• ASTM: D6128. 2023. Standard test method for shear testing of bulk solids using the Jenike shear cell, West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International (www.astm.org)
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah, E. C., and D. Geldart. 1999. The use of bulk density measurements as flowability indicators. Powder Technology 102 (2):151–65. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00208-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkassar, Y., V. K. Agarwal, R. K. Pandey, and N. Behera. 2021. Analysis of dense phase pneumatic conveying of fly ash using CFD including particle size distribution. Particulate Science and Technology 39 (3):322–37. doi: 10.1080/02726351.2020.1727592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. S. 1990. Prediction of pressure losses in pneumatic conveying pipelines. PhD diss., Thames Polytechnic, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Behera, R. K. 2010. Characterization of fly ash for their effective management and utilization. Doctoral diss.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. J., M. S. A. Bradley, and R. G. McGregor. 2015. Brookfield powder flow tester–Results of round robin tests with CRM-116 limestone powder. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E 229 (3):215–30. doi: 10.1177/0954408914525387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, A. 2019. Pneumatic conveying systems. Chemical engineering. New York: Continuing Education and Development, Inc. pp. 1-57, https://www.cedengineering.com
   Google Scholar
• Cenna, A. A., K. C. Williams, M. G. Jones, and W. Robinson. 2014. Analysis of wear mechanisms in pneumatic conveying pipelines of fly ash. In Engineering Asset Management 2011, 539–47. London: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4993-4_47.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, M. K. 1992. Flow assessment of powders in pneumatic conveying: A bench top assessment. University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, G. 1979. The impact of powder properties on dense phase flow. Proceeding for the International Conference on Pneumatic Conveying, London, UK
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, A., J. Maier, E. Karampinis, J. Kalivodova, P. Grammelis, E. Kakaras, and G. Scheffknecht. 2018. Fly ash formation and characteristics from (co-) combustion of an herbaceous biomass and a Greek lignite (low-rank coal) in a pulverized fuel pilot-scale test facility. Energies 11 (6):1581. doi: 10.3390/en11061581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazali, M., and O. Á. Kaushal. 2015. Characteristics of fly ash from thermal power plants and its management along with settling pond design. International Journal of Engineering Research & Science 1 (4):24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Garg, V., S. S. Mallick, P. García-Trinanes, and R. J. Berry. 2018. An investigation into the flowability of fine powders used in pharmaceutical industries. Powder Technology 336:375–82. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howladar, M. F., and M. Islam. 2016. A study on physico-chemical properties and uses of coal ash of Barapukuria coal fired thermal power plant, Dinajpur, for environmental sustainability. Energy, Ecology and Environment 1 (4):233–47. doi: 10.1007/s40974-016-0022-y.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. K., R. W. Thring, S. Helle, and H. S. Ghuman. 2012. Ash management review—applications of biomass bottom ash. Energies 5 (10):3856–73. doi: 10.3390/en5103856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenike, A. W. 1976. Storage and flow of solids. Bulletin No. 123 of the Utah Engineering Experiment Station; Vol. 53, No. 26, November 1964 (No. NP-22770). Salt Lake City: Utah University.
   Google Scholar
• Jyothirmai, N. S., B. Jogarao, and T. J. Kumar. 2016. Troubleshooting in dry fly ash conveying systems. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 03 (12):541–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, J., J. Fitzpatrick, K. Cronin, M. A. Fenelon, and S. Miao. 2017. The effects of fluidised bed and high shear mixer granulation processes on water adsorption and flow properties of milk protein isolate powder. Journal of Food Engineering 192:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinzing, G. E., F. Rizk, R. Marcus, and L. S. Leung. 2011. Pneumatic conveying of solids: A theoretical and practical approach. Vol. 8. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lumay, G., F. Boschini, K. Traina, S. Bontempi, J. C. Remy, R. Cloots, and N. Vandewalle. 2012. Measuring the flowing properties of powders and grains. Powder Technology 224:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R., Y. H. Roos, and S. Miao. 2016. Influence of pre-crystallisation and water plasticization on flow properties of lactose/WPI solids systems. Powder Technology 294:365–72. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.02.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, L. Y., C. Mao, L. P. Chen, and C. Y. Yang. 2016. Precision of pharmaceutical powder flow measurement using ring shear tester: High variability is inherent to powders with low cohesion. Powder Technology 301:920–6. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.07.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupo, M., D. Schütz, E. Riedl, D. Barletta, and M. Poletto. 2019. Assessment of a powder rheometer equipped with a cylindrical impeller for the measurement of powder flow properties at low consolidation. Powder Technology 357:281–90. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.08.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molerus, O. 1996. Overview: Pneumatic transport of solids. Powder Technology 88 (3):309–21. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(96)03136-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, D. 2003. Pneumatic conveying design guide. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mallick, S. S. 2009. Modelling of fluidised dense-phase pneumatic conveying of powders. PhD diss., University of Wollongong, Australia. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3077.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, D. 2016. Pneumatic conveying design guide. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, J. K., S. R. Guru, P. Dash, and P. K. Pradhan. 2021. Fly ash management and condition monitoring of ash pond. Earth Systems and Environment 5 (2):445–57. doi: 10.1007/s41748-020-00163-9.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, R. 1992. Improving scale-up procedures for the design of pneumatic conveying systems. PhD diss., University of Wollongong, Australia. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1584.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, R. 1999. Material properties and flow modes in pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology 104 (2):157–63. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00044-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnayake, C. 2005. A comprehensive scaling up technique for pneumatic transport systems. Norway: Tel-Tek Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rout, J. R. 2011. Study of the settling charactristics of fly ash-water slurry and designing of a settling pond. Doctoral diss.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, D. 2021. Powders and bulk solids. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76720-4
   Google Scholar
• Setia, G., S. S. Mallick, R. Pan, and P. W. Wypych. 2016. Modeling solids friction factor for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic transport of powders using two layer flow theory. Powder Technology 294:80–92. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, H., D. Barletta, and M. Poletto. 2017. A comparison between powder flow property testers. Particuology 32:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2016.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, K. P. 2017. Fundamentals, troubleshooting & maintenance of ash handling plants and pneumatic conveying systems for bulk materials. https://practicalmaintenance.net
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, K. 2020. Studies towards development of improved modelling and scale-up procedures for dense-phase pneumatic conveying of fine powders. PhD diss., Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. 2020. An investigation on pressure drop for gas-solids flow through bends. PhD diss., Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, K., S. S. Mallick, and A. Mittal. 2021. An evaluation of testing and modeling procedure for solids friction factor for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying of fine powders. Particulate Science and Technology 39 (1):62–73. doi: 10.1080/02726351.2019.1662527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, C. R., and J. S. Mason. 1987. Components of pneumatic conveying systems. In Bulk Solids Handling, 408–37. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-2635-6_13.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, C. R., and J. S. Mason. 1988. Bulk solids handling: An introduction to the practice and technology. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P. W. 1989. Pneumatic conveying of bulk solids. PhD diss., University of Wollongong, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P. W., D. B. Hastie, I. Frew, and D. M. Cook. 2006. An experimental investigation into the feed rate capacity of rotary valve and blow tank feeders. Particulate Science and Technology 24 (2):165–79. doi: 10.1080/02726350500544216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. C. 2008. Dense phase pneumatic conveying of powders: Design aspects and phenomena. Australia: University of Newcastle.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., X. Cai, Y. Guo, and L. Jiang. 2022. Problem Analysis and Operation Evaluation of Dry Ash Removal System in Coal-fired Power Plant. In 2022 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing (pp. 285–88). doi: 10.1145/3523286.3524555.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W.C. ed., 2003. Handbook of fluidization and fluid-particle systems. Boca Raton: CRC press. doi: 10.1201/9780203912744.
   Google Scholar