Person and relation as categories: Mauss’ legacy

References

• Allen, Nicholas J. 2000. Categories and Classifications: Maussian Reflections on the Social. Oxford: Berghahn. in particular, pp. 91-100, “Mauss and the categories”.
   Google Scholar
• Ardener, Edwin. 2007. The Voice of Prophecy and Other Essays. Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 2014. “‘Categories’.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 Vols. Transl. J. L. Ackrill. Vol. I, edited by Jonathan Barnes, 3–25. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bastide, Roger, and Germaine Dieterlen. 2002. La Notion de Personne en Afrique Noire. Paris: Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, Gregory. 1987 (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. London: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Carrithers, Michael, Steven Collins, and Steven Lukes. 1985. The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, Donald. 2005. Truth, Language, and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delpuech, André, Christine Laurière, and Carine Peltier-Caroff. 2019. Les Années Folles de L’Ethnographie, Trocadéro 28–37. Paris: Musée d’Histoire Naturelle.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Émile. 1960 (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie réligieuse. Le système totémique en Australie. Paris: Quadrige.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Émile, and Marcel Mauss. 1963 (1903). Primitive Classifications. Rodney Needham. London: Cohen & West.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1970 (1934). “Lévy-Bruhl’s Theory of Primitive Mentality.” Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 1 (2): 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1976 (1937). Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande. Abbrev. Eva Gillies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortes, Meyer. 1945. The Dynamics of Clanship among the Tallensi. London: International African Institute/Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortes, Meyer. 1987 (1973). “The Concept of the Person.” In Religion, Morality and the Person: Essays on Tallensi Religion, 247–286. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2008 (1961). Introduction to Kant’s Anthropology. Kate Briggs and Roberto Nigro. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Godlove, J., and F. Terry. 1997. Religion, Interpretation and Diversity of Belief. The Framework Model. from Kant to Durkheim to Davidson. Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, J. 2016. Translator's Introduction: The Gift that Keeps on Giving. In Marcel Mauss, the Gift, Expanded Edition. Chicago: HAU Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hamelin, Octave. 1907. Essai sur les Éléments Principaux de la Représentation. Paris: Alcan.
   Google Scholar
• Hattiangadi, Jagdish. 2005. The Emergence of Minds in Space and Time. In The Mind as a Scientific Object: Between Brain and Culture, Christina E. Erneling and David Martel Johnson (eds), pp. 79–100. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, Douglas. 1979. Gödel, Escher, Bach. NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Holbraad, Martin. 2009. “Ontography and Alterity: Defining Anthropological Truth.” Social Analysis 53 (2): 80–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, Daniel, and Erik Myin. 2013. Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1931. Méditations Cartésiennes: Introduction à la phenomenologie. G. Peiffer and E. Levinas transl. Paris: Collin.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1960. Cartesian Meditations. D. Cairns transl. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 1991. “Becoming Persons: Consciousness and Sociality in Human Evolution.” Cultural Dynamics 4 (3): 355–378.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 1996. Key Debates in Anthropology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2010. “The man in the Machine and the Self-Builder.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 35 (3–4): 353–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Wendy. 1998. ‘One of us’: Marcel Mauss and ‘English’ Anthropology. In Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute, James, Wendy and N.J. Allen (eds), pp. 3-26. Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Th. 2004. “Mauss et la Science de La Culture selon Ernst Cassirer.” L'Année Sociologique 54 (1): 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• König, René. 2014 (1972). Marcel Mauss (1872-1950). Trivium 17. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/trivium/4895. Accessed 13 February 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, Adam. 1983. Anthropology and Anthropologists. The Modern British School. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, Adam. 2019. “Zones of Contact.” Art and Ethnography in mid-Century France. Times Literary Supplement 5), March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean. 1988. Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, Edmund R. 1966. Rethinking Anthropology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1962. La Pensée Sauvage. Paris: Plon.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 2002 (1962). Le Totémisme Aujourd’hui. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Lévy-Bruhl, L. 1949. (1938–1939). Carnets, edited by V. Karady. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Lévy-Bruhl, L. 1951 (1910). Les Fonctions Mentales Dans les Sociétés Inférieures. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Lévy-Bruhl, L. 1952 (1934). “A Letter to E. E. Evans-Pritchard.” British Journal of Sociology 3 (2): 117–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin, Victor. 2014. “Radical Enactivism, Wittgenstein and the Cognitive gap.” Adaptive Behavior 22 (5): 350–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin, Victor. 2021. “Why Enactivists Should Care About Wittgenstein.” Philosophia 49: 1083–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael P. 1998. Truth in Context: An Essay on Pluralism and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, McKim. 1976. Hindu Transactions: Diversity Without Dualism. In Transaction and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behavior, Bruce Kapferer (ed.), pp.109-142. London: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, Marcel. 1938. “Une Catégorie de L'Esprit Humain: La Notion de Personne; Celle de “Moi”.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 68: 263–281.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, Marcel. 1985 (1938). “A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of Person; the Notion of Self.” In Carrithers et al op.cit., edited by W. D. Halls, 1–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, Marcel. 2016 (1925). The Gift. Trans. Jane I. Guyer. Chicago: Hau Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mosko, M. 2015. “Unbecoming Individuals.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (1): 361–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, Rodney. 1972. Belief, Language, and Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, Rodney. 1975. “Polythetic Classification: Convergence and Consequences.” Man 10: 349–369.
   Google Scholar
• Parodi, D. 1904. “La Critique des Catégories Kantiennes chez Charles Renouvier.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 12 (3): 605–620.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, W. S. F. 2012. “The Mystery of Some ‘Last Things’ of Émile Durkheim: Notes for a Research Project.” Durkheimian Studies / Études Durkheimiennes n.s 18: 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Piette, A. 2019. Theoretical Anthropology or How to Observe a Human Being. London: Wiley-Iste.
   Google Scholar
• Pina-Cabral, João. 1994. “Personal Identity and Ethnic Ambiguity: Naming Practices among the Eurasians of Macao*.” Social Anthropology 2 (2): 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Pina-Cabral, João. 2002. Between China and Europe: Person, Culture and Emotion in Macao. London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Pina-Cabral, João. 2010. The Door in the Middle: Six Conditions for Anthropology. In Culture Wars: Context, Models and Anthropologists’ Accounts, Deborah James, Evie Plaice, Christina Toren (eds.), pp. 152-169. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Pina-Cabral, João. 2018. “Modes of Participation.” Anthropological Theory 18 (4): 435–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina-Cabral, João. 2018. “Turning to Life: A Comment.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8 (3): 522–529.
   Google Scholar
• Pina-Cabral, João. 2019. “My Mother or Father: Person, Metaperson, and Transcendence in Ethnographic Theory.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 25: 303–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina-Cabral, João. 2020. “On Embracing the Vague.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 10 (3): 786–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina-Cabral, João. 2022. “Charity and Grace.” Anthropological Theory in print.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt-Rivers, Julian. 2017 [1992]. ‘The place of grace in Anthropology’. In From Hospitality to Grace. A Julian Pitt-Rivers Omnibus. Ed. Giovanni da Col and Andrew Shryock, 69-103. Chicago: HAU Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rapport, Nigel. 2015. “Anthropology Through Levinas.” Current Anthropology 56 (2): 256–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renouvier, Charles. 1973 (1903). “Doctrine des Catégories de la Relation.” Archives de Philosophie 36 (2): 177–207.
   Google Scholar
• Rival, Laura. 1998. The Social Life of Trees. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rial, Carmen e Grossi, Miriam. 2000. Mauss Segundo Suas Alunas. Video, NAVI. Santa Catarina: NIGS/UFICS. https://vimeo.com/37724989 Accessed 20 February 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. “Principles of Categorization.” In Cognition and Categorization, edited by E. Rosch, and B. Lloyd, 27–48. New Jersey: Erlbaum Assocs.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, Marshall. 2011. “What Kinship is (Part one).” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17 (1): 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalins, Marshall. 1972. Stone-Age Economics. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn. 1995. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Cambridge: Prickly Pear Pamphlet. URL: http://www.thememorybank.co.uk/pricklypear/6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn. 2020. Relations. An Anthropological Account. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Studtman, Paul. 2012. Aristotles’ Categories. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-categories/ Accessed 13 February 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Belknap for Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Throop, C. J. 2018. “Being Open to the World.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8 (1/2): 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillion, Germaine. 1988 (1973). Ravensbrück. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Toren, Christina. 1990. Making Sense of Hierarchy: Cognition as Social Process in Fiji. London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Toren, Christina. 2002. Anthropology as the Whole Science of What it is to be Human. In Anthropology Beyond Culture, Richard G. Fox and Barbara J. King (eds), pp. 105–24. London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Thomas D. 2018. Personalism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/personalism/ Accessed 13 May 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Witty, Katherine. 2011. “Situation and Limitation: Making Sense of Heidegger on Thrownness.” European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1): 61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar