Post-colonial caste, Ambedkar, and the politics of counter-narrative

References

• Ahmad, A. 1991. “Between Orientalism and Historicism: Anthropological Knowledge of India.” Studies in History 7 (1): 135–163.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, A. 1997. “Post-Colonial Theory and Post-Condition.” Socialist Registrar 18 (March): 353–381.
   Google Scholar
• Ambedkar, B. R. 1916. “Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development.” BAWS 1: 3–22. Bombay: Govt of Maharashtra. Pub. 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Ambedkar, B. R. 1936. “Annihilation of Caste.” BAWS 1: 23–96. Bombay: Govt of Maharashtra. Pub. 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Ambedkar, B. R. 1945. “What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables.” BAWS 9: 437–489. Govt of Maharashtra. Pub. 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ambedkar, B. R. 1946a. “Who Were the Shudras?” BAWS 7: 1–227. Govt of Maharashtra. Pub. 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ambedkar, B. R. 1946b. “The Untouchables: Who Were They and Why They Became Untouchables?” BAWS 7: 333–383. Govt of Maharashtra. Pub. 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ambedkar, B. R. 1987. “Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Ancient India.” BAWS 3: 151–429. Govt of Maharashtra. Pub. 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 1986. “Is Homo Hierarchicus?” American Ethnologist 13 (4): 745–761.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 1993. “Number in the Colonial Imagination.” In Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia, edited by Carol A. Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer, 314–339. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyathurai, G. 2014. “Review Essay: The Making of the Postcolonial Theory and Practice: Brahmanical and Transnational.” South Asian History and Culture 5 (1): 133–140.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyathurai, G. 2020. “Living Buddhism: Migration, Memory, and Castelessness in South India.” History and Anthropology Online First: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, T. 2005. “Of Caste and Colonialism.” New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 7 (2): 187–195.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, S. 2004. Caste, Culture and Hegemony: Social Domination in Colonial Bengal. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxi, U. 2000. “Emancipation as Justice: The Legacy and Vision of Dr Ambedkar.” In From Periphery to Centre Stage: Ambedkar, Ambedkarism & Dalit Future, edited by K. C. Yadav, 49–73. New Delhi: Manohar Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bayly, S. 1999. Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, D. E. 2007. “Sovereignties, the World Conference against Racism 2001 and the Formation of a Dalit Human Rights Campaign.” Questions de Recherche. ISSN 1634-0671. (20).
   Google Scholar
• Béteille, A. 1979. “Homo Hierarchicus, Homo Equalis.” Modern Asian Studies 13 (4): 529–548.
   Google Scholar
• Béteille, A. 1986. “Individualism and Equality [and Comments and Replies].” Current Anthropology 27 (2): 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béteille, A. 2001. “Race and Caste.” The Hindu, March 10.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Breckenridge, C. A., and P. van der Veer. 1993. Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cháirez-Garza, J. F. 2018. “B.R. Ambedkar, Franz Boas and the Rejection of Racial Theories of Untouchability.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 41 (2): 281–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarti, A. 2019. “Caste Wasn’t a British Construct – and Anyone Who Studies History Should Know That.” The Wire, https://thewire.in/caste/caste-history-postcolonial-studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravorty, S. 2019. The Truth About Us: The Politics of Information from Manu to Modi. Delhi: Hachette India.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisman, L. 2003. Postcolonial Contraventions: Cultural Readings of Race, Imperialism and Transnationalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, B. S. 1962. “Political Systems in Eighteenth-Century India: The Banaras Region.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 82 (3): 312–320.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, B. S. 1985. “The Command of Language and the Language of Command.” In Subaltern Studies IV: Writings on South Asian History and Society, edited by Ranajit Guha, 276–329. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, B. S. 1987. An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays, 224–254. New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, B. S. 1996. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coronil, F. 1992. “Can Post-Coloniality Be Decolonized? Imperial Banality and Post-Colonial Power.” Public Culture 5 (1): 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNicola, A. 2003. “Book Review. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India.” Anthropological Quarterly 76 (1): 177–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, S., and A. Dubey. 2011. “Caste in 21st Century India: Competing Narratives.” Economic and Political Weekly XLVI (11): 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, N. B. 1987. The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, N. B. 1989. “The Invention of Caste: Civil Society in Modern India.” Social Analysis 25: 42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, N. B., ed. 1992a. Colonialism and Culture. Ann Arbor, MI: The Michigan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, N. B. 1992b. “Castes of Mind.” Representations 37 (winter): 56–78.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, N. B. 2001. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dirlik, A. 1994. “The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism.” Critical Inquiry 20 (2): 328–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, S. 2004. “Colonial Casts.” Economic and Political Weekly 39 (18): 1798–1799.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, L. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T. 1996. “From Structure to Substance: Ambedkar, Dumont and Orientalism.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 30 (2): 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, C. J. 1977. “British India or Traditional India: An Anthropological Problem.” Ethnos 42 (3-4): 95–121.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, C. J. 1989. “Misconceiving the Grain Heap: A Critique of the Concept of the Indian Jajmani System.” In Money and the Morality of Exchange, edited by J. Parry and M. Bloch, 33–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly, D. 2000. “Can the Dalit Speak? Caste, Postcoloniality and the New Humanities?” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 23 (1): 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly, D. 2005. Caste, Colonialism and Counter-Modernity: Notes on a Postcolonial Hermeneutics of Caste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geetha, V., and S. V. Rajadurai. 1998. Towards a Non-Brahmin Millennium: From Iyothee Thass to Periyar. Kolkata: Samya.
   Google Scholar
• Goss, J. 1996. “Postcolonialism: Subverting Whose Empire?” Third World Quarterly 17 (2): 239–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilaiah, K. 1996. Why I am Not a Hindu: A Sudra Critique of Hindutva Philosophy, Culture and Political Economy. Calcutta: Samya.
   Google Scholar
• Inden, R. 1990. Imagining India. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kapferer, B. 1988. Legends of People, Myths of State: Violence, Intolerance, and Political Culture in Sri Lanka and Australia. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khare, R. S. 2006. Caste, Hierarchy, and Individualism: Indian Critiques of Louis Dumont’s Contributions. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mamdani, M. 2001. When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mani, B. R. 2005. Debrahmanising History: Dominance and Resistance in Indian Society. New Delhi: Manohar Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, M. 1969. “Review of Homo Hierarchicus, by Louis Dumont.” American Anthropologist 71 (6): 1166–1175.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, P. 1993. “Inventing Village Tradition: The Late 19th Century Origins of the North Indian “Jajmani System”.” Modern Asian Studies 27 (2): 357–395.
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, A. 1992. “The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-Colonialism”.” Social Text (31/32): 84–98.
   Google Scholar
• Mines, D. P. 2003. “Book Review of Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India.” American Ethnologist 30 (2): 312–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. 2010. “This Will Resurrect British Agenda of Dividing the Nation on Caste Lines.” The Economic Times, March 18. Accessed May 18, 2021. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/this- will-resurrect- british-agenda- of-dividing-the-nation- on-caste-lines/articleshow/5696233.cms?from=mdr.
   Google Scholar
• Nigam, A. 2000. “Secularism, Modernity, Nation: Epistemology of the Dalit Critique.” Economic and Political Weekly 35 (48): 4256–4268.
   Google Scholar
• Omvedt, G. 2006. “Review of Dr. Ambedkar and Untouchability: Analysing and Fighting Caste by C. Jaffrelot.” The Journal of Asian Studies 65 (2): 438–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian, M. S. S. 2002. “One Step Outside Modernity: Caste, Identity Politics and Public Sphere.” Economic and Political Weekly 37 (18): 1735–1741.
   Google Scholar
• Pant, R. 1987. “The Cognitive Status of Caste in Colonial Ethnography: A Review of Some Literature on the North West Province and Oudh.” The Indian Economic and Social History Review 24 (2): 145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, B. 1997. “The Postcolonial: Conceptual Category or Chimera?” The Yearbook of English Studies. 27, The Politics of Postcolonial Criticism: 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. 1981. Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities: Structure in the Early History of the Sandwich Islands Kingdom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. 1997. Writing Social History. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, P. 2016. “What Lies Behind the Inclusion of Caste in the UK Equality Act?” LSE Blog. Accessed May 15, 2021. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/religionglobalsociety/2016/10/what-lies-behind-the-inclusion- of-caste-in-the-uk-equality-act/.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, P. 2019. “Sacerdotal Violence and the Caste System: The Long Shadow of Christian- Orientalism (January 18, 2019).” Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 302/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, S. 2012. Flesh and Fish Blood: Postcolonialism, Translation, and the Vernacular. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shohat, E. 1992. “Notes on the “Post-Colonial”.” Social Text (31/32): 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trouillot, M. R. 1995. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanath, R. 2014. The Pariah Problem: Caste, Religion, and the Social in Modern India. Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zene, C., ed. 2013. The Political Philosophies of Antonio Gramsci and Ambedkar: Subalterns and Dalits. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar