Citizens’ knowledge of and perceptions of multi-storey wood buildings in seven European countries

References

• Aguilar FX, Roos A, Haapala A, Lähtinen K, Kniivilä M, Hoen H-F. 2023. Dweller preferences for wood as a load-bearing material in residential buildings. J For Econ. 38:77–111. doi:10.1561/112.00000537.
   Google Scholar
• BREEAM. 2020. What is BREEAM? pmhttmk ps://www.breeam.com/ [cited 01.07 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Brege S, Stehn L, Nord TJCM, & ECONOMICS. 2014. Business models in industrialized building of multi-storey houses. Constr Manag Econ. 32:208–226. doi:10.1080/01446193.2013.840734.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard MD, Nyrud AQ, Bysheim K, Kutnar A, Vahtikari K, Hughes M. 2017. Building material naturalness: Perceptions from Finland, Norway and Slovenia. Norway and Slovenia. Indoor Built. Environ. 30:92–107.
   Google Scholar
• Craig A, Abbott L, Laing R, Edge M. 2002. Assessing the acceptability of alternative cladding materials in housing: theoretical and methodological challenges. 17th Conference of the International Association for People-Environment Studies; La Coruna, Spain. 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Davies I, Walker B, Pendlebury J. 2002. Timber cladding in Scotland. Edinburgh: ARCA Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson J, Glad W, Johansson M. 2015. User involvement in Swedish residential building projects: a stakeholder perspective. J Hous Built Environ. 30(2):313–329. doi:10.1007/s10901-014-9412-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2011. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. In: Commission E, editor. Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe. COM(2011) 571. Brussels: Brussels European Commission; p. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2019. Voluntary energy performance certification schemes. https://ec.europa.eu: European Commission. [cited 7.11.2019]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/eu-buildings-factsheets-topics-tree/voluntary-energy-performance-certification-schemes
   Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT. 2019. Population: development (in millions). https://ec.europa.eu: Eurostat. [cited Oct 25 2019]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/population-demography-migration-projections/visualisations
   Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2023. Forest Land. http://www.fao.org/faostat/: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY. 1999. Wood handbook – wood as an engineering material. Gen. tech. Rep. FPL–GTR–113. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 463 p.
   Google Scholar
• Frihart CR. 2015. Introduction to special issue: wood adhesives: past, present, and future. For Prod. J. 65(1/2):4–8. doi:10.13073/65.1-2.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold S, Rubik F. 2009. Consumer attitudes towards timber as a construction material and towards timber frame houses – selected findings of a representative survey among the German population. J Cleaner Prod. 17:303–309. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høibø O, Hansen E, Nybakk E. 2015. Building material preferences with a focus on wood in urban housing: durability and environmental impacts. Can J For Res. 45:1617–1627. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2015-0123.
   Google Scholar
• Høibø O, Hansen E, Nybakk E, Nygaard M. 2018. Preferences for urban building materials: does building culture background matter? † Forests. 9:504. doi:10.3390/f9080504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmekoski E, Jonsson R, Nord T. 2015. Context, drivers, and future potential for wood-frame multi-story construction in Europe. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 99:181–196. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähtinen K, Harju C, Toppinen A. 2019. Consumers’ perceptions on the properties of wood affecting their willingness to live in and prejudices against houses made of timber. Wood Mat Sci Eng. 14:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larasatie P, Guerrero JE, Conroy K, Hall TE, Hansen E, Needham MD. 2018. What does the public believe about tall wood buildings? An exploratory study in the US Pacific Northwest. J For. 116:429–436. doi:10.1093/jofore/fvy025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läthinen K, Häyrinen L, Roos A, Toppinen A, Aguilar FX, Thorsen BJ, Hujala T, Nyrud AQ, Hoen HF. 2021. Consumer housing values and prejudices against living in wooden homes in the Nordic region. Silva Fenn. 55(2):1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahapatra K, Gustavsson L. 2009. General conditions for construction of multi-storey wooden buildings in Western Europe. Växjö: School of Technology and Design, Växjö University.
   Google Scholar
• Mcmanus B, Baxter D. 1981. Revealed preferences for building materials: a survey of low and moderate income households. Hous Soc. 8:45–51. doi:10.1080/08882746.1981.11429860.
   Google Scholar
• Milaj K, Sinha A, Miller TH, Tokarczyk JA. 2017. Environmental utility of wood substitution in commercial buildings using life-cycle analysis. Wood Fiber Sci. 49:338–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord T, Tykkä S, Mccluskey D, Ollonqvist P, Hugosson M, Ukranski K, Bouriaud L, Bajric F, Nyrud AQ, Roos A. 2010. Role of policies on innovations in timber frame construction: cases from sub-group timber construction vertical value chain in COST action E51 integrating innovation and development policies for the forest sector. Luleå: Luleå tekniska universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Nyrud AQ, Bringslimark TJW. 2010. Is interior wood use psychologically beneficial? A review of psychological responses toward wood. J Wood Fiber Sci. 42:202–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman B, Källsner BJST, Växjö University S. 2011. National building regulations in relation to multi-storey wooden buildings in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Rametsteiner E, Oberwimmer R, Gschwandtl I. 2007. Europeans and wood: What do Europeans think about wood and its uses? A review of consumer and business surveys in Europe. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe Liaison Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Rice J, Kozak RA, Meitner MJ, Cohen DHJW, Science F. 2007. Appearance wood products and psychological well-being. Wood Fiber Sci. 38:644–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson AB, Lam FC, Cole RJJB. 2012. A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of mid-rise office building construction alternatives: laminated timber or reinforced concrete. Buildings. 2:245–270. doi:10.3390/buildings2030245.
   Google Scholar
• Roos A, Woxblom L, Mccluskey DJSF. 2010. The influence of architects and structural engineers on timber in construction – perceptions and roles. Silva Fenn. 44:871–884. doi:10.14214/sf.126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathre R, Gustavsson L. 2009. A state-of-the-art review of energy and climate effects of wood product substitution. Växjö: School of Technology and Design, Växjö University.
   Google Scholar
• Schauerte T. 2010. Consumer perceptions on wooden multistory houses: segmenting international markets. Proceedings of the International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe-Timber Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Strobel K, Nyrud AQ, Bysheim K. 2017. Interior wood use: Linking user perceptions to physical properties. Scand. J. For. Res. 32:798–806.
   Google Scholar
• Toppinen A, Miilumäki M, Vihemäki H, Toivonen R, Lähtinen K. 2019a. Collaboration and shared logic for creating value-added in three Finnish wooden multi-storey building projects. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 14:269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppinen A, Sauru M, Pätäri S, Lähtinen K, Tuppura A. 2019b. Internal and external factors of competitiveness shaping the future of wooden multistory construction in Finland and Sweden. Constr. Manag. Econ. 37:201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Green Building Council. 2009. Green building leadership is LEED. [cited 01.07.2020]. Available from: https://new.usgbc.org/leed
   Google Scholar
• Vehola A, Hurmekoski E, Lähtinen K, Ruokamo E, Roos A, Toivonen R, Toppinen A. 2022. Citizen beliefs concerning wood as a construction material under extreme weather events. Can J For Res. 52:1266–1279. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2022-0108.
   Google Scholar
• Vihemäki H, Ludvig A, Toivonen R, Toppinen A, Weiss G. 2019. Institutional and policy frameworks shaping the wooden multi-storey construction markets: a comparative case study on Austria and Finland. Wood Material Science and Engineering. 14(5):312–324. doi:10.1080/17480272.2019.1641741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viholainen N, Franzini F, Låhtinen K, Nyrud AQ, Widmark C, Hoen HF, Toppinen A. 2021. Citizen views on wood as a construction material: results from seven European countries. Can J For Res. 51:647–659. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2020-0274.
   Google Scholar