Empowering local citizens: assessing the inclusiveness of a digital democratic innovation for co-creating a Voting Advice Application

References

• Albrecht, S. 2006. “Whose Voice is Heard in Online Deliberation?: A Study of Participation and Representation in Political Debates on the Internet.” Information, Communication & Society 9 (1): 62–82. doi:10.1080/13691180500519548.
   Google Scholar
• Ammann, C. 2018. Wer klickt sich zum passenden Politiker? Blogbeitrag, https://blog.smartvote.ch/wer-klickt-sich-zum-passenden-politiker/06.10.201
   Google Scholar
• Baek, Y. M., M. Wojcieszak, and M. Delli Carpini. 2012. “Online versus Face-To-Face Deliberation: Who? Why? What? With What Effects?” New Media & Society 14 (3): 363–383. doi:10.1177/1461444811413191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierlein, C., C. J. Kemper, A. Kovaleva, and B. Rammstedt. 2012. Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung politischer Kompetenz- und Einflussüberzeugungen: Political Efficacy Kurzskala (PEKS). (GESIS-Working Papers, 2012/18). Mannheim: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Beste, S., and D. Wyss. Cognitive Complexity as a Proxy for High Quality Deliberation? A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration of Cognitive Complexity and Deliberative Quality in the EuroPolis Discussions. In ECPR General Conference, Glasgow, pp. 3–6. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brundidge, J., S. A. Reid, S. Choi, and A. Muddiman. 2014. “The “Deliberative Digital divide: ” Opinion Leadership and Integrative Complexity in the US Political Blogosphere.” Political Psychology 35 (6): 741–755. doi:10.1111/pops.12201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C. 1979. “Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior: An Attempt to Resolve a Lingering Conceptual Dilemma.” American Politics Quarterly 7 (2): 225–239. doi:10.1177/1532673X7900700207.
   Google Scholar
• Dermont, C. 2016. “Taking Turns at the Ballot Box: Selective Participation as a New Perspective on Low Turnout.” Swiss Political Science Review 22 (2): 213–231. doi:10.1111/spsr.12194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, K. L., M. Palmer, and D. M. Glick. 2019. “Who Participates in Local Government? Evidence from Meeting Minutes.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 28–46. doi:10.1017/S153759271800213X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esau, K., D. Friess, and C. Eilders. 2017. “Design Matters! An Empirical Analysis of Online Deliberation on Different News Platforms.” Policy & Internet 9 (3): 321–342. doi:10.1002/poi3.154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fivaz, J., and G. Nadig. 2010. “Impact of Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) on Voter Turnout and Their Potential Use for Civic Education.” Policy & Internet 2 (4): 167–200. doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1025.
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., and K. Newton. 2012. Evaluating Democratic Innovations. Curing the Democratic Malaise?. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, M., H.P. Schaub, and S. Müller. 2018. “O Sister, Where Art Thou? Theory and Evidence on Female Participation at Citizen Assemblies.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 2 (2): 173–195. doi:10.1332/251510819X15471289106095.
   Google Scholar
• gfs.bern. 2021. VOX-Analyse Juni 2021. Nachbefragung und Analyse zur eidgenössischen Volksabstimmung vom 13. Juni 2021. Bern: gfs.bern.
   Google Scholar
• Gianola, G., M. Gerber, and D. Wyss. 2021. Ergebnisbericht zur Könizer Demokratiefabrik 2021. Bern: Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Bern.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S., D. Wyss, and A. Bächtiger. 2020. “Deliberating or Thinking (Twice) About Democratic Preferences: What German Citizens Want from Democracy.” Political Studies 68 (2): 311–331. doi:10.1177/0032321719843967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürkan, A., L. Iandoli, M. Klein, and G. Zollo. 2010. “Mediating Debate Through On-Line Large-Scale Argumentation: Evidence from the Field.” Information Sciences 180 (19): 3686–3702. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2010.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iandoli, L., I. Quinto, P. Spada, M. Klein, and R. Calabretta. 2018. “Supporting Argumentation in Online Political Debate: Evidence from an Experiment of Collective Deliberation.” New Media & Society 20 (4): 1320–1341. doi:10.1177/1461444817691509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, D., and R. Kies. 2005. “Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy.” Acta Politica 40 (3): 317–335. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennstal, J. 2019. “Deliberation and Complexity of Thinking. Using the Integrative Complexity Scale to Assess the Deliberative Quality of Minipublics.” Swiss Political Science Review 25 (1): 64–83. doi:10.1111/spsr.12343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karen, M., C. J. Tolbert, and M. Stansbury. 2003. Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R., A. E. Sokhey, C. Abernathy, K. M. Esterling, D. M. J. Lazer, A. Lee, W. Minozzi, and M. A. Neblo. 2021. “Demographics and (Equal?) Voice: Assessing Participation in Online Deliberative Sessions.” Political Studies 69 (1): 66–88. doi:10.1177/0032321719890805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersting, N. 2005. The Quality of Political Discourse: Can E-Discussion Be Deliberative? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Political Studies Association, Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Kersting, N. 2014. “Online Beteiligung – Elektronische Partizipation – Qualitätskriterien aus Sicht der Politik”.” In Internet und Partizipation: Bottom-up oder Top-down? Politische Beteiligungsmöglichkeiten im Internet, edited by K. Voss, 53–90. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Kersting, N. 2019. “Online Partizipation. Evaluation und Entwicklung- Status Quo und Zukunft.” In Politik in der digitalen Gesellschaft: Zentrale Problemfelder und Forschungsperspektiven, edited by J. Hofmann, et al., 105–122. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. 2012. Enabling Large-Scale Deliberation Using Attention-Mediation Metrics. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
   Google Scholar
• Köniz, M. 2021. “Fakten & Zahlen.” https://www.koeniz.ch/wohnen/gemeindeportraet/zahlen–fakten.page/145. last access: 25.8.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. P. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience. Lanham: MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., and J. Pianzola. 2015. “Voting Advice Applications.” In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, edited by Khosrow-Pour, D.B.A. and Mehdi, 6427–6436. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Lefevere, J., and S. Walgrave. 2014. “A Perfect Match? The Impact of Statement Selection on Voting Advice applications’ Ability to Match Voters and Parties.” Electoral Studies 36: 252–262. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A., R. E. Fredheim, D. Wyss, and S. Beste. 2019. “Deliberation and Identity Rules: The Effect of Anonymity, Pseudonyms, and Real-Name Requirements on the Cognitive Complexity of Online News Comments.” Political Studies 69 (1): 45–65. Version ac. doi:10.1177/0032321719891385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munzert, S., P. Barber, A. Guess, and J. Yang. 2020. “Do Online Voter Guides Empower Citizens? Evidence from a Field Experiment with Digital Trace Data.” Public Opinion Quarterly 84 (3): 675–698. doi:10.1093/poq/nfaa037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neblo, M. A., K. M. Esterling, R. P. Kennedy, D. M. J. Lazer, and A. E. Sokhey. 2010. “Who Wants to Deliberate-And Why?” The American Political Science Review 104 (3): 566–583. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V. 2009. “Citizens Deliberating Online.” In Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, edited by Davies, T. and Gangadharan, S., 37–58. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., and J. N. Cappella. 2002. “Online Deliberation and Its Influence: The Electronic Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000.” IT & Society 1 (1): 303–329.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan, S., M. Shephard, and L. Paterson. 2015. “Online Discussion and the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum: Flaming Keyboards or Forums for Deliberation?” Electoral Studies 38: 192–205. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S., G. Ravid, and V. Soroka. 2004. “De-Lurking in Virtual Communities: A Social Communication Network Approach to Measuring the Effects of Social and Cultural Capital.” 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2004, no. C: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Räss, N., I. Differding, and J. Odermatt. 2021. Jugend, politische Partizipation und Digitalisierung. Eine Analyse der digitalen politischen Partizipation junger Menschen in der Schweiz. TA-SWISS Publikationsreihe (TA 76/2021). Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG.
   Google Scholar
• Rottinghaus, B., and T. Escher. 2020. “Mechanisms for Inclusion and Exclusion Through Digital Political Participation: Evidence from a Comparative Study of Online Consultations in Three German Cities.” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 30: 261–298.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., P. Müller, C. Schemer, D. Stefanie Wirz, M. Wettstein, and W. Wirth. 2018. “Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30 (2): 316–326. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edw037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., P. John, and P. Sturgis. 2012. “Taking Political Engagement Online: An Experimental Analysis of Asynchronous Discussion.” Political Studies 61 (4): 709–730. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00989.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M. R., A. Bächtiger, M. Spörndli, and J. Steiner. 2003. “Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index.” Comparative European Politics 1 (1): 21–48. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K., and K. Grönlund. 2013. “Online Deliberation and Its Outcome – Evidence from the Virtual Polity Experiment.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9 (2): 167–184. doi:10.1080/19331681.2011.637709.
   Google Scholar
• Wuttke, A., C. Schimpf, and H. Schoen. 2020. “When the Whole is Greater Than the Sum of Its Part: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs.” The American Political Science Review 114 (2): 356–374. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyss, D., and S. Beste. 2017. “Artificial Facilitation: Promoting Collective Reasoning Within Asynchronous Discussion.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14 (3): 214–231. doi:10.1080/19331681.2017.1338175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyss, D., S. Beste, and A. Bächtiger. 2015. “A Decline in the Quality of Debate? The Evolution of Cognitive Complexity in Swiss Parliamentary Debates on Immigration (1968–2014).” Swiss Political Science Review 21 (4): 636–653. doi:10.1111/spsr.12179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar