Unlocking politicians’ potential: what fosters purposeful use of performance information in support of voice?

References

• Allegrini, V., F. Monteduro, and F. Del Prete. 2021. “Explaining the Use of Performance Information by Public Managers: Do Task-Related Factors Matter?” Public Organization Review 22 (4): 1–17. doi:10.1007/s11115-021-00556-y.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., M. J. Beynon, and E. Genc. 2017. “Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity.” Administrative Sciences 7 (1): 4. doi:10.3390/admsci7010004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J. 2009. “The Demand Side of Performance Measurement: Explaining councillors’ Utilization of Performance Information in Policymaking.” International Public Management Journal 12 (1): 24–47. doi:10.1080/10967490802649395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., N. Belle, S. Serritzlew, M. Sicilia, and I. Steccolini. 2019. “Performance Information in Politics: How Framing, Format, and Rhetoric Matter to politicians’ Preferences.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 2 (2). doi:10.30636/jbpa.22.67.
   Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., J. Christensen, C. M. Dahlmann, A. Mathiasen, and N. B. G. Petersen. 2019. “The Role of Evidence in Politics: Motivated Reasoning and Persuasion Among Politicians.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 1117–1140. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., and S. Serritzlew. 2016. “Interpreting Performance Information: Motivated Reasoning or Unbiased Comprehension.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 73–82. doi:10.1111/puar.12406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. K. 1964. “Ethics and the Public Service.” Public Administration Review 24 (4): 234–243. doi:10.2307/973314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtoldt, M. N., C. K. De Dreu, B. A. Nijstad, and H. S. Choi. 2010. “Motivated Information Processing, Social Tuning, and Group Creativity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99 (4): 622–637. doi:10.1037/a0019386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. 2003. “Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures.” Public Administration Review 63 (5): 586–607. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnholt, B., M. Bækgaard, and K. Houlberg. 2016. “Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information?” Public Performance & Management Review 39 (3): 560–580. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1137766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boivie, S., M. K. Bednar, R. V. Aguilera, and J. L. Andrus. 2016. “Are Boards Designed to Fail? The Implausibility of Effective Board Monitoring.” The Academy of Management Annals 10 (1): 319–407. doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1120957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., J. S. Gould-Williams, J. Law, and R. M. Walker. 2004. “Problems of Rational Planning in Public Organizations an Empirical Assessment of the Conventional Wisdom.” Administration & Society 36 (3): 328–350. doi:10.1177/0095399704265294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., F. S. Berry, and K. Yang. 2010. “The State of Public Strategic Management Research: A Selective Literature Review and Set of Future Directions.” The American Review of Public Administration 40 (5): 495–521. doi:10.1177/0275074010370361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., B. A. Nijstad, and D. van Knippenberg. 2008. “Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 12 (1): 22–49. doi:10.1177/1088868307304092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmidt, S., and K. Meyfroodt. 2021. “How Does Public Disclosure of Performance Information Affect politicians’ Attitudes Towards Effort Allocation? Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (4): 756–772. doi:10.1093/jopart/muaa054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert, J. R., and E. R. Burris. 2007. “Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open?” Academy of Management Journal 50 (4): 869–884. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., K. M. Bartol, Z. X. Zhang, and C. Li. 2017. “Enhancing Employee Creativity via Individual Skill Development and Team Knowledge Sharing: Influences of Dual‐focused Transformational Leadership.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 38 (3): 439–458. doi:10.1002/job.2134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenbeiß, S. A., and S. Boerner. 2013. “A Double‐edged Sword: Transformational Leadership and Individual Creativity.” British Journal of Management 24 (1): 54–68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00786.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., A. M. Khademian, H. Ingram, and A. S. Schneider. 2006. “Ways of Knowing and Inclusive Management Practices.” Public Administration Review 66 (S1): 89–99. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00669.x.
   Google Scholar
• Gailmard, S. 2010. “Politics, Principal–Agent Problems, and Public Service Motivation.” International Public Management Journal 13 (1): 35–45. doi:10.1080/10967490903547225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., M. Baekgaard, A. Decramer, M. Audenaert, and S. Goeminne. 2020. “Institutional Isomorphism, Negativity Bias and Performance Information Use by Politicians: A Survey Experiment.” Public Administration 98 (1): 14–28. doi:10.1111/padm.12390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., S. Desmidt, and J. De Moyer. 2016. “Strategic Decision Quality in Flemish Municipalities.” Public Money & Management 36 (5): 317–324. doi:10.1080/09540962.2016.1194073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., S. Desmidt, P. A. Nielsen, and M. Baekgaard. 2017. “Rational Planning and politicians’ Preferences for Spending and Reform: Replication and Extension of a Survey Experiment.” Public Management Review 19 (9): 1251–1271. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1210905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. 2008. “Does Intrinsic Motivation Fuel the Prosocial Fire? Motivational Synergy in Predicting Persistence, Performance, and Productivity.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (1): 48–58. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. Y. A. Babin, R. Anderson, and R. Tatham. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. A Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P. 2007. Performance Measurement: Getting Results. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, U. T., L. B. Andersen, L. L. Bro, A. Bøllingtoft, T. L. M. Eriksen, A. L. Holten, and N. Westergård-Nielsen. 2019. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Transformational and Transactional Leadership.” Administration & Society 51 (1): 3–33. doi:10.1177/0095399716667157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. D. L., and M. Holzer. 2001. “Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation.” Public Administration Review 61 (6): 693–708. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleven, T., T. S. Floris, M. Granberg, S. Montin, O. Rieper, and I. Valo. 2000. “Renewal of Local Government in Scandinavia: Effects for Local Politicians.” Local Government Studies 26 (2): 93–116. doi:10.1080/03003930008433991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korac, S., I. Saliterer, M. Sicilia, and I. Steccolini. 2020. “Contrasting and Explaining Purposeful and Legitimizing Uses of Performance Information: A Mayor’s Perspective.” Public Management Review 22 (4): 553–577. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1599059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, Y. Y., and C. Sundaramurthy. 2009. “Experience-Based Human Capital and Social Capital of Outside Directors.” Journal of Management 35 (4): 981–1006. doi:10.1177/0149206308321551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. 2015. “Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research.” Public Performance & Management Review 38 (3): 459–486. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A., and D. Vogel. 2014. “The PSM–Leadership Fit: A Model of Performance Information Use.” Public Administration 92 (4): 974–991. doi:10.1111/padm.12014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., D. M. Webster, and A. Klem. 1993. “Motivated Resistance and Openness to Persuasion in the Presence or Absence of Prior Information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (5): 861–876. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Z., and L. Woodliffe. 2010. “Donor Misreporting: Conceptualizing Social Desirability Bias in Giving Surveys.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 21 (4): 569–587. doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9153-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., and L. Van Dyne. 1998. “Predicting Voice Behavior in Work Groups.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (6): 853–868. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., and K. Willoughby. 2005. “Models of Performance‐measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects.” Public Administration Review 65 (2): 180–190. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00443.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyfroodt, K., and S. Desmidt. 2021. “Can Rational Planning Stimulate Cooperative Behaviour? How Perceived Self-Efficacy Mediates the Relationship Between Strategic Plan Use, PI Use and Strategic Voice by Local Councillors.” Public Management Review 23 (6): 818–842. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1699949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyfroodt, K., S. Desmidt, and S. Goeminne. 2019. “Do Politicians See Eye to Eye? The Relationship Between Political Group Characteristics, Perceived Strategic Plan Quality, and Strategic Consensus in Local Governing Majorities.” Public Administration Review 79 (5): 749–759. doi:10.1111/puar.13058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, E. W. 2014. “Employee Voice and Silence.” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1 (1): 173–197. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2005. “Goal‐based Learning and the Future of Performance Management.” Public Administration Review 65 (2): 203–216. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00445.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2009. “Through a Glass, Darkly: Understanding the Effects of Performance Regimes.” Public Performance & Management Review 32 (4): 592–603. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576320409.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., P. A. Nielsen, and A. Kroll. 2017. “Managerial Use of Performance Data by Bureaucrats and Politicians.“ In Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions, edited by Oliver James, Sebastian R. Jilke, Gregg G. Van Ryzin, 244–269. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., and S. K. Pandey. 2010. “The Big Question for Performance Management: Why Do Managers Use Performance Information?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 849–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., S. K. Pandey, and B. E. Wright. 2012a. “Prosocial Values and Performance Management Theory: Linking Perceived Social Impact and Performance Information Use.” Governance 25 (3): 463–483. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01583.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., S. K. Pandey, and B. E. Wright. 2012b. “Setting the Table: How Transformational Leadership Fosters Performance Information Use.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1): 143–164. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A., and M. Baekgaard. 2013. “Performance Information, Blame Avoidance, and politicians’ Attitudes to Spending and Reform: Evidence from an Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (2): 545–569. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A., and D. P. Moynihan. 2017a. “How Do Politicians Attribute Bureaucratic Responsibility for Performance? Negativity Bias and Interest Group Advocacy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (2): 269–283. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A., and D. P. Moynihan. 2017b. “Romanticizing Bureaucratic Leadership? The Politics of How Elected Officials Attribute Responsibility for Performance.” Governance 30 (4): 541–559. doi:10.1111/gove.12256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., and C. K. De Dreu. 2012. “Motivated Information Processing in Organizational Teams: Progress, Puzzles, and Prospects.” Research in Organizational Behavior 32: 87–111. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberski, D. L. 2014. “Lavaan.Survey: An R Package for Complex Survey Analysis of Structural Equation Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 57 (1): 1–27. doi:10.18637/jss.v057.i01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. 1996. “Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., and A. Hondeghem. 2008. “Building Theory and Empirical Evidence About Public Service Motivation.” International Public Management Journal 11 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1080/10967490801887673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., A. Hondeghem, and L. R. Wise. 2010. “Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future.” Public Administration Review 70 (5): 681–690. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., O. Q. Pasha, and L. H. Edwards. 2013. “Does Performance Management Lead to Better Outcomes? Evidence from the US Public Transit Industry.” Public Administration Review 73 (4): 625–636. doi:10.1111/puar.12076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premkumar, G., K. Ramamurthy, and C. S. Saunders. 2005. “Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships.” Journal of Management Information Systems 22 (1): 257–294. doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, A., G. A. Brewer, and O. Neumann. 2016. “Public Service Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review and Outlook.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 414–426. doi:10.1111/puar.12505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliterer, I., and S. Korac. 2014. “The Discretionary Use of Performance Information by Different Local Government Actors–Analysing and Comparing the Predictive Power of Three Factor Sets.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 80 (3): 637–658. doi:10.1177/0020852313518170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schott, C., and A. Ritz. 2018. “The Dark Sides of Public Service Motivation: A Multi-Level Theoretical Framework.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvx011.
   Google Scholar
• Sundaramurthy, C., K. Pukthuanthong, and Y. Kor. 2014. “Positive and Negative Synergies Between the Ceo’s and the Corporate Board’s Human and Social Capital: A Study of Biotechnology Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 35 (6): 845–868. doi:10.1002/smj.2137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, R., and A. Henderson. 2017. “Transformational Leadership and Organizational Processes: Influencing Public Performance.” Public Administration Review 77 (4): 554–565. doi:10.1111/puar.12654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenabeele, W., A. Ritz, and O. Neumann. 2018. “Public Service Motivation: State of the Art and Conceptual Cleanup.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, edited by E. Ongaro and S. Van Thiel, 261–278. London, UK: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., G. Bouckaert, and J. Halligan. 2010. “Performance Management in the Public Sector.”. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., and S. Van de Walle. 2016. “Performance Information in the Public Sector: How It is Used.”. Houndmills/New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyne, L., and J. A. LePine. 1998. “Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity.” Academy of Management Journal 41 (1): 108–119. doi:10.2307/256902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ees, H., J. Gabrielsson, and M. Huse. 2009. “Toward a Behavioral Theory of Boards and Corporate Governance.” Corporate Governance an International Review 17 (3): 307–319. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00741.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kenhove, P., I. Vermeir, and S. Verniers. 2001. “An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships Between Ethical Beliefs, Ethical Ideology, Political Preference and Need for Closure.” Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4): 347–361. doi:10.1023/A:1010720908680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loon, N. M. 2016. “Is Public Service Motivation Related to Overall and Dimensional Work-Unit Performance as Indicated by Supervisors?” International Public Management Journal 19 (1): 78–110. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1064839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R., and F. Hattke. 2018. “How is the Use of Performance Information Related to Performance of Public Sector Professionals? Evidence from the Field of Academic Research.” Public Performance & Management Review 41 (2): 390–414. doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1400986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., G. A. Boyne, and G. A. Brewer. 2010. Public Management and Performance: Research Directions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., D. P. Moynihan, and S. K. Pandey. 2012. “Pulling the Levers: Transformational Leadership, Public Service Motivation, and Mission Valence.” Public Administration Review 72 (2): 206–215. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02496.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., and S. K. Pandey. 2010. “Transformational Leadership in the Public Sector: Does Structure Matter?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (1): 75–89. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., and J. Y. Hsieh. 2007. “Managerial Effectiveness of Government Performance Measurement: Testing a Middle‐range Model.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 861–879. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00774.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar