Costs and outcomes of collaborative relationships: interlocal collaboration effects on green job creation in Florida Metropolitan Areas

References

• Agranoff, R. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 66 (s1): 56–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. 2009. “Recent Developments in the Study of Inter-Jurisdictional Agreements: An Overview and Assessment.” State & Local Government Review 41 (2): 133–142. doi:10.1177/0160323X0904100208.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, S., J. Short, K. Jung, and S. Arlikatti. 2015. “Intergovernmental Cooperation in the Provision of Public Safety: Monitoring Mechanisms Embedded in Interlocal Agreements.” Public Administration Review 75 (3): 401–410. doi:10.1111/puar.12312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arntsen, B., O. Torjesen, and T. -I. Karlsen. 2018. “Drivers and Barriers of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Health Services – the Norwegian Case.” Local Government Studies 44 (3): 371–390. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1427071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. E. Warner. 2015. “Inter-Municipal Cooperation and Costs: Expectations and Evidence.” Public Administration 93 (1): 52–67. doi:10.1111/padm.12104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardo, R., and J. Scholz. 2010. “Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 632–649. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bish, R., and R. Warren. 1972. “Scale and Monopoly Problems in Urban Government Services.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 8 (1): 97–122. doi:10.1177/107808747200800109.
   Google Scholar
• Boschet, C., and T. Rambonilaza. 2017. “Collaborative Environmental Governance and Transaction Costs in Partnerships: Evidence from a Social Network Approach to Water Management in France.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61 (1): 105–123. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1290589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, K. 1997. “Extracting Team Mental Models Through Textual Analysis.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 18 (s 1): 533–558.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B. 2016. “Local Government Autonomy and State Reliance on Special District Governments: A Reassessment.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (3): 481–492. doi:10.1177/106591290605900315.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B., C. V. Hawkins, and D. E. Westberg. 2017. “An Exploration of Collaboration Risk in Joint Ventures: Perceptions of Risk by Local Economic Development Officials.” Economic Development Quarterly 31 (3): 210–227. doi:10.1177/0891242417710325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula, M. 2020. “A Contextual Explanation of Regional Governance in Europe: Insights from Inter-Municipal Cooperation.” Public Management Review 22 (12): 1819–1851. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1665700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.H. 2021. “Municipal Carbon Reduction Policy in Taiwan: A Collective Action Perspective.” Journal of Urban Affairs 43 (8): 1100–1117. doi:10.1080/07352166.2020.1718508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., R. C. Feiock, and K. Wassel. 2017. “Urban Pressures and Innovations: Sustainability Commitment in the Face of Fragmentation and Inequality.” The Review of Policy Research 34 (5): 700–724. doi:10.1111/ropr.12242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, A., and D. Rochefort. 1989. “Coordination, Continuity, and Centralized Control: A Policy Perspective on Service Strategies for the Chronic Mentally Ill.” The Journal of Social Issues 45 (3): 145–159. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01561.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., T. Nabatch, and S. Balogh. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. L. 2022a. “State Interventions and Interlocal Collaborations Across the Three Pillars of Sustainability.” State and Local Government Review 54 (2): 120–145. doi:10.1177/0160323X221089664.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. L. 2022b. “State-Level Influences on Community-Level Municipal Sustainable Energy Policies.” Urban Affairs Review 58 (4): 1065–1095. doi:10.1177/1078087421995262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2009. “Metropolitan Governance and Institutional Collective Action.” Urban Affairs Review 44 (3): 356–377. doi:10.1177/1078087408324000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2013. “The Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 397–425. doi:10.1111/psj.12023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2023. “Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action.” In Handbook on Local and Regional Governance, edited by P. Teles, 362–389. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R., R. Krause, and C. Hawkins. 2017. “The Impact of Administrative Structure on the Ability of City Governments to Overcome Functional Collective Action Dilemmas: A Climate and Energy Perspective.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (4): 615–628. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R., I. Lee, and H. Park. 2012. “Administrators’ and Elected Officials’ Collaboration Networks: Selecting Partners to Reduce Risk in Economic Development.” Public Administration Review 72 (s1): S58–68. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02659.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R., and J. Scholz. 2010. “Self-Organizing Governance of Institutional Collective Action.” In Self-Organizing Federalism: Collaborative Mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas, edited by R. Feiock and J. Shcolz, 297. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., A. Steinacker, and H. J. Park. 2009. “Institutional Collective Action and Joint Ventures for Economic.” Development Public Administration Review 69: 256–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E., A. Henry, and M. Lubell. 2013. “Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 598–610. doi:10.1111/ajps.12011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” The American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasnain-Wynia, R. 2003. “Overview of the Community Care Network Demonstration Program and Its Evaluation.” Medical Care Research and Review 60 (4 suppl): 5S–16S. doi:10.1177/1077558703259068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C., Q. Hu, and R. Feiock. 2016. “Self‐organizing Governance of Local Economic Development: Informal Policy Networks and Regional Institutions.” Journal of Urban Affairs 38 (5): 643–660. doi:10.1111/juaf.12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, M., and L. Fowler. 2021. “Institutional Collective Action on Drugs: Functional and Vertical Dilemmas of Unused Pharmaceuticals.” The Review of Policy Research 38 (1): 76–96. doi:10.1111/ropr.12406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., and P. Leifeld. 2016. “Structural and Institutional Determinants of Influence Reputation: A Comparison of Collaborative and Adversarial Policy Networks in Decision Making and Implementation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, E., and J. Ewalt. 1998. “Interorganizational Coordination, Administrative Consolidation, and Policy Performance.” Public Administration Review 58 (5): 417–428. doi:10.2307/977551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juenke, E. 2005. “Management Tenure and Network Time: How Experience Affects Bureaucratic Dynamics.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (1): 113–131. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, K., M. Song, and H. J. Park. 2019. “The Dynamics of an Interorganizational Emergency Management Network: Interdependent and Independent Risk Hypotheses.” Public Administration Review 79 (2): 225–235. doi:10.1111/puar.12993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kegler, M., A. Steckler, K. Mcleroy, and S. Malek. 1998. “Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina.” Health Education & Behavior 25 (3): 338–353. doi:10.1177/109019819802500308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., M. Song, and H. Park. 2019. “The Network Effect on the Performance of Local Economic Development.” Public Performance & Management Review 42 (3): 732–754. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1509010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, C., R. Feiock, C. Hawkins, and Y. Lee. 2016. “Impacts of Federal Stimulus Funding on Economic Development Policy Networks Among Local Governments.” The Review of Policy Research 33 (2): 140–159. doi:10.1111/ropr.12165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, C. -G., N. Ki, and S. -J. Hwang. 2021. “Selective Vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes.” Sustainability 13 (21): 11941. doi:10.3390/su132111941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., and I. W. Lee. 2022. “A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Intergovernmental Collaboration for Local Economic Development.” Urban Affairs Review 58 (1): 229–257. doi:10.1177/1078087420949936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., P. W. Brandenburger, and S. K. Pandey. 2010. “Interlocal Service Cooperation in U.S. Cities: A Social Network Explanation.” Public Administration Review 70 (2): 268–278. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02133.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., R. Feiock, and S. Handy. 2009. “City Adoption of Environmentally Sustainable Policies in California’s Central Valley.” Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (3): 293–308. doi:10.1080/01944360902952295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K., and L. O’Toole. 2003. “Public Management and Educational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Networking.” Public Administration Review 63 (6): 689–699. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G., R. O’Leary, and C. Gerard. 2015. “Collaboration and Performance: Perspectives from Public Managers and NGO Leaders.” Public Performance & Management Review 38 (4): 684–716. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraoka, T., and C. N. Avellaneda. 2021. “Do the Networks of Inter-Municipal Cooperation Enhance Local Government Performance?” Local Government Studies 47 (4): 616–636. doi:10.1080/03003930.2020.1869545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noda, Y. 2022. “Intermunicipal Cooperation, Integration Forms, and Vertical and Horizontal Effects in Japan.” Public Administration Review 1: 25. doi:10.1111/puar.13569.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Group. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., and E. Ostrom. 1971. “Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 31 (2): 203–216. doi:10.2307/974676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., C. Tiebout, and R. Warren. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.” The American Political Science Review 55 (4): 831–842. doi:10.2307/1952530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L., and K. Meier. 2004. “Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Matching Structural Networks and Managerial Networking.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (4): 469–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L., and K. Meier. 2015. “Public Management, Context, and Performance: In Quest of a More General Theory.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 237–256. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and H. Milward. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and H. Milward. 2001. “Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks.” Public Administration Review 61 (4): 414–423. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 64–78. doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez, E. E., M. F. Castillo, and E. I. Sánchez. 2022. “How Policy Entrepreneurs Encourage or Hinder Urban Growth Within a Political Market.” Urban Affairs Review 107808742210970. forthcoming. doi:10.1177/10780874221097078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, J., and B. Stiftel. 2005. “Introduction: The Challenges of Adaptive Governance.” In Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning, edited by J. T. Scholz and B. Stiftel, 250. Washington D.C: Future Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., and C. W. Thomas. 2017. “Winners and Losers in the Ecology of Games: Network Position, Connectivity, and the Benefits of Collaborative Governance Regimes.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (4): 647–660. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaowei, C., L. Rui, and W. Youqiang. 2016. “Role and Significance of Political Incentives: Understanding Institutional Collective Action in Local Inter-Governmental Arrangements in China.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 38 (4): 211–222. doi:10.1080/23276665.2016.1258890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M. K. 2022. “How Do Bridging and Bonding Networks Emerge in Local Economic Development Collaboration?” International Journal of Public Administration 1–13. doi:10.1080/01900692.2022.2044858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M., R. Berardo, and R. Feiock. 2014. “Solving Institutional Collective Action Problems in Multiplex Networks.” Complexity, Governance & Networks 1 (1): 49–60. doi:10.7564/14-CGN7.
   Google Scholar
• Song, M. 2020. Testing the Forms and Consequences of Collaboration Risk in Emergency Management Networks, The Social Science Journal, DOI: 10.1080/03623319.2020.1744949
   Google Scholar
• Song, M., H. J. Park, and K. Jung. 2018. “Do Political Similarities Facilitate Interlocal Collaboration?” Public Administration Review 78 (2): 261–269. doi:10.1111/puar.12887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinacker, A. 2004. “Game-Theoretic Models of Metropolitan Cooperation.” In Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation, edited by R. Feiock, 45–69. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinacker, A. 2010. “The Institutional Collective Action Perspective on Self-Organizing Mechanisms: Market Failures and Transaction Cost Problems.” In Self-Organizing Federalism: Collaborative Mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas, edited by R. Feiock and J. Scholz, 30–39. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suo, L., L. Xue, and S. Cao. 2023. “How Governance Boundaries Affect Regional Collaboration on Atmospheric Governance—Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Delta.” The Review of Policy Research. doi:10.1111/ropr.12541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W. L. 2017. “Examining the Impact of Local Collaborative Tools on Urban Sustainability Efforts: Does the Managerial Environment Matter?” American Review of Public Administration 47 (4): 455–468. doi:10.1177/0275074015598576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W. L., and S. Y. Kim. 2018. “Practical Prescriptions for Governing Fragmented Governments.” Policy & Politics 46 (2): 273–292. doi:10.1332/030557318X15230058720979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, J., and R. Feiock. 2015. “Improving Outcomes in Fiscal Federalism: Local Political Leadership and Administrative Capacity.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4): 1059–1080. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, J., R. Feiock, and J. Youm. 2020. “When Collaboration is Risky Business: The Influence of Collaboration Risks on Formal and Informal Collaboration.” American Review of Public Administration 50 (1): 33–44. doi:10.1177/0275074019867421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N. 2015. “Collaboration in Federal Hydropower Licensing: Impacts on Process, Outputs, and Outcomes.” Public Performance & Management Review 38 (4): 578–606. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N., and T. Scott. 2017. “Linking Network Structure to Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (1): 163–181. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61 (4): 674–698. doi:10.2307/2096399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varda, D., and J. Retrum. 2015. “Collaborative Performance as a Function of Network Members’ Perceptions of Success.” Public Performance & Management Review 38 (4): 632–653. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., and D. Spitzley. 1996. “The Politics of Local Economic Development.” Economic Development Quarterly 10 (2): 115–150. doi:10.1177/089124249601000201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, H. 2013. “Clean Energy Policies and Green Jobs: An Evaluation of Green Jobs in U.S. Metropolitan Areas.” Energy Policy 56: 644–652. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, H., R. Feiock, and F. Berry. 2017. “Overcoming Collective Action Barriers to Energy Sustainability: A Longitudinal Study of Climate Protection Accord Adoption by Local Governments.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79: 339–346. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youm, J., and J. Terman. 2020. “Dynamic Collaboration: The Effects of External Rules and Collaboration Scope on Interlocal Collaboration.” The Review of Policy Research 37 (6): 823–841. doi:10.1111/ropr.12403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeemering, E. 2009. “What Does Sustainability Mean to City Officials?” Urban Affairs Review 45 (2): 247–273. doi:10.1177/1078087409337297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeemering, E. 2015. “Assessing Local Elected Officials’ Concerns About Interlocal Agreements.”Urban Studies.” Urban Studies 53 (11): 2347–2362. doi:10.1177/0042098015590768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. 2014. “The City Manager’s Role in Policy-Making: A Perspective Beyond Substitution and Collaboration Models.” American Review of Public Administration 44 (3): 358–372. doi:10.1177/0275074012467494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar