The impact of the central government’s intervention on local democracy

References

• Anckar, C. 2000. “Size and Party System Fragmentation.” Party Politics 6 (3): 305–328. doi:10.1177/1354068800006003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, J. Law, and R. M. Walker. 2005. “External Constraints on Local Service Standards: The Case of Comprehensive Performance Assessment in English Local Government.” Public Administration 83 (3): 639–656. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00466.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, R. E. 2003. “Toothless Tigers? Councillor Perceptions of Local Scrutiny Committees in England and Wales.” Local Government Studies 29 (2): 1–18. doi:10.1080/03003930308559367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I. , and M. Flinders. 2016. “Themes and Issues in Multi-Level Governance Bache, Ian, Flinders, Matthew.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance. Oxford, England: Edward Elgar Publishing 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Balgobin, R., and N. Pandit. 2001. “Stages in the Turnaround Process: The Case of IBM UK.” European Management Journal 19 (3): 301–316. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00027-5.
   Google Scholar
• Beeri, I. 2012. “Turnaround Management Strategies in Local Authorities: Not Only for Poor Performers.” Local Government Studies 38 (4): 461–483. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.629192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeri, I. 2013. “Direct Administration of Failing Local Authorities: Democratic Deficit or Effective Bureaucracy?” Public Money & Management 33 (2): 137–144. doi:10.1080/09540962.2013.763433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeri, I. 2021. “Lack of Reform in Israeli Local Government and Its Impact on Modern Developments in Public Management.” Public Management Review 23 (10): 1423–1435. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1823138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeri, I., and E. Kval. 2010. “Elections with No Elected Members: Nominated Committees and Democratic Aspects in Local Elections.” In City and State in Israel: Local Government Toward the Seventh Decade, edited by A. Brichta, E. Vigoda-Gadot, and G. Pade. Jerusalem: Carmel Publishing [in Hebrew] 50–85.
   Google Scholar
• Beeri, I., and D. Navot. 2013. “Local Political Corruption: Potential Structural Malfunctions at the Central–Local, Local–Local and Intra-Local Levels.” Public Management Review 15 (5): 712–739. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.707682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeri, I., and E. Razin, Eds. 2015. Local Democracy in Israel: Decentralization, Localism, Participation and Local Politics. Jerusalem: Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies [Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Beeri, I., and F. Yuval. 2015. “New Localism and Neutralizing Local Government: Has Anyone Bothered Asking the Public for Its Opinion?” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 25 (2): 623–653. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeri, I., and A. Zaidan. 2021. “Merging, Disaggregating and Clustering Local Authorities: Do Structural Reforms Affect Perceptions About Local Governance and Democracy?” Territory, Politics, Governance, Apr 14: 1–26. doi:10.1080/21622671.2021.1908159.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Bassat, A., and M. Dahan. 2009. The Political Economics of the Municipalities. Jerusalem, Israel: The Israel Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bessette, J. 1980. “Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government.” How Democratic is the Constitution 102: 109–111.‏.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, A. 2008. “The Effective Number of Parties at Four Scales: Votes, Seats, Legislative Power and Cabinet Power.” Party Politics 14 (2): 167–187. doi:10.1177/1354068807085888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. 2006. “Strategies for Public Service Turnaround: Lessons from the Private Sector?” Administration & Society 38 (3): 365–388. doi:10.1177/0095399705286004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., and K. J. Meier. 2009. “Environmental Change, Human Resources and Organizational Turnaround.” Journal of Management Studies 46 (5): 835–863. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00813.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buček, J., and B. Smith. 2000. “New Approaches to Local Democracy: Direct Democracy, Participation and the ‘Third sector’.” Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy 18 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1068/c9950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., and S. Hix. 2011. “The Electoral Sweet Spot: Low‐magnitude Proportional Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 383–397. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00495.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. 2001. Local Government Today. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C., and R. Paton. 2004. “Failure and Turnaround in Public and Non-Profit Organizations.” Public Money & Management 24 (4): 197–199. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2004.00420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., and F. Boucek. 2003. “Constructing the Number of Parties.” Party Politics 9 (3): 291–315. doi:10.1177/1354068803009003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulau, H., and K. Prewitt. 1973. Labyrinths of Democracy: Adaptations, Linkages, Representation, and Policies in Urban Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, C. J., and H. T. Miller. 1996. Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse.‏. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanem, A. A., and M. Mustafa. 2009. “Arab Local Government in Israel: Partial Modernisation as an Explanatory Variable for Shortages in Management.” Local Government Studies 35 (4): 457–473. doi:10.1080/03003930902992709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 2010. “The Effective Number of Parties: A New Approach.” Party Politics 16 (2): 171–192. doi:10.1177/1354068809339538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, H. M. 2011. “The Lisbon Agenda and Entrepreneurship Policy: Governance Implications from a German Perspective.” Public Administration 89 (4): 1526. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01940.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R., and D. Sweeting. 2004. “U.S.-Style Leadership for English Local Government?” Public Administration Review 64 (4): 474–488. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00393.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haus, M., and D. Sweeting. 2006. “Mayors, Citizens and Local Democracy Henry Bäck, Bäck, Hubert, Heinelt, Annick, Magnier.” In The European Mayor, 151–175. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, E. A. E. B., and G. W. Marks. 2004. “Contrasting Visions of Multi-Level Governance.” Multi-Level Governance 26 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., and A. Edwards. 2012. “The Accountability of Power: Democracy and Governance in Modern Times.” European Political Science Review 4 (2): 177–194. doi:10.1017/S1755773911000154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanyna, M., and A. Shah 2013. How Close is Your Government to Its People? Worldwide Indicators on Localism and Decentralization, Economics, Discussion Paper, No. 2013-38, July 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Joumard, I., and P. M. Kongsrud. 2003. “Fiscal Relations Across Government Levels.” OECD Economic Studies 2003 (1): 155–229. doi:10.1787/eco_studies-v2003-art5-en.
   Google Scholar
• Kersting, N., and A. Vetter, Eds. 2003. Reforming Local Government in Europe: Closing the Gap Between Democracy and Efficiency. Opladen: Leske ‏Budrich).
   Google Scholar
• Kotzé, H., and C. L. Steenekamp. 2009. Values and Democracy in South Africa: Comparing Elite and Public Values. Johannesburg: KAS.
   Google Scholar
• Kudo, H. 2003. “Between the ‘Governance’ Model and the Policy Evaluation Act: New Public Management in Japan.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 69 (4): 483–504. doi:10.1177/0020852303694005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., J. Bogumil, and S. Grohs. 2008. “Evaluating Administrative Modernization in German Local Governments: Success or Failure of the “New Steering Model”?” Public Administration Review 68 (5): 851–863. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00927.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., and J. Franzke. 2021. “Multi-Level Responses to COVID-19: Crisis Coordination in Germany from an Intergovernmental Perspective.” Local Government Studies 48 (2): 1–23. doi:10.1080/03003930.2021.1904398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., M. Hellström, U. Ramberg, and R. Reiter. 2021. “Tracing Divergence in Crisis Governance: Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden Compared.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 87 (3): 556–575. doi:10.1177/0020852320979359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. ““Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27. doi:10.1177/001041407901200101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowande, K., M. Ritchie, and E. Lauterbach. 2019. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (3): 644–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. 1993 Structural Policy and Multilevel Governance in the EC Cafruny, Alan W., Glenda G., Rosenthal. The Maastricht Debates and Beyond Boulder, Colorado, US: L. Rienner Publishers. 392.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. 2002. “Best Value, New Public Management or New Direction?” In New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, edited by K. McLaughlin, S. P. Osborne, and E. Ferlie, 129–141. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mellahi, K., P. Jackson, and L. Sparks. 2002. “An Exploratory Study into Failure in Successful Organizations: The Case of Marks & Spencer.” British Journal of Management 13 (1): 15–29. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez, M. S., and C. R. Grose. 2011. “Doubling Down: Inequality in Responsiveness and the Policy Preferences of Elected Officials.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 43 (3): 457–491.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, C., and F. Velasco. 2022. “From Centralisation to New Ways of Multi-Level Coordination: Spain’s Intergovernmental Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Local Government Studies 48 (2): 1–20. doi:10.1080/03003930.2022.2042683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Ed. 2010. The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. Oxfordshire, England, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. 2005. “Taking Stock of Multi-Level Governance Networks.” European Political Science 4 (3): 316–327. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210032.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, F. 2020. “Towards a Populist Local Democracy? The Consequences of Populist Radical Right Local Government Leadership in Western Europe.” Representation 56 (3): 411–430. doi:10.1080/00344893.2019.1643771.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., and J. Pierre. 2004. “Multi-level governance and democracy: a Faustian bargain? Bache, I., Flinders, M.“ Multi-Level Governance Oxford, England: Oxford: Oxford University Press. 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Vol. 75. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratchett, L. 2004. “Local Autonomy, Local Democracy and the ‘New localism’.” Political Studies 52 (2): 358–375. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00484.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingewertz, Y., and I. Beeri. 2018. “How Effective is Central Enforcement? Evidence from Convened Committees in Failing Local Authorities.” Environment & Planning C: Politics & Space 36 (2): 357–380. doi:10.1177/2399654417713494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. 2004. “Strong Demand, Huge Supply: Governance in an Emerging Epoch.” Multi-Level Governance 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, G. R., and J. L. Morin. 2011. “The Effect of Descriptive Representation on Latinos’ Views of Government and of Themselves.” Social Science Quarterly 92 (2): 483–508. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00779.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V., and M. Wood. 2019. “Conceptualizing Throughput Legitimacy: Procedural Mechanisms of Accountability, Transparency, Inclusiveness and Openness in EU Governance.” Public Administration 97 (4): 727–740. doi:10.1111/padm.12615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A., Ed. 2006. Local Governance in Developing Countries. Washington, D.C., U.S.A: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., and J. Torfing. 2010. “Improving Democratic Governance Through Institutional Design: Civic Participation and Democratic Ownership in Europe.” Regulation & Governance 4 (1): 71–91. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01072.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2005. “The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks.” Scandinavian Political Studies 28 (3): 195–218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00129.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2004. Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2005. “Governance Network Theory: Towards a Second Generation.” European Political Science 4: 305–315.
   Google Scholar
• Tuttnauer, O., and A. Friedman. 2020. “Unnatural Partners: Coalescence in Israeli Local Government.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 30 (3): 358–378. doi:10.1080/17457289.2020.1727483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, P. V. 2000. “Policy Horizons in West European Parliamentary Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 38 (1): 37–61. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar