Miles’ law in Finnish municipalities: where decision-makers stand depends on where they sit

References

• Allison, G. T. 1969. “Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” The American Political Science Review 63 (3): 689–718. doi:10.2307/1954423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, G. T., and M. H. Halperin. 1972. “Bureaucratic Politics: “A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications”.” World Politics 24 (S1): 40–79. doi:10.2307/2010559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, C., and C. García. 2014. Local Public Finances and Municipal Reform in Finland. Working papers No. 1121. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/local-public-finances-and-municipal-reform-in-finland_5jz2qt0zj024-en.
   Google Scholar
• Anttiroiko, A.V., and P. Valkama. 2017. “The Role of Localism in the Development of Regional Structures in Finland.” Public Policy and Administration 32 (2): 152–172. doi:10.1177/0952076716658797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, D. R., L. L. Martin, and L. A. Kajfez. 1985. “County Home Rule: Does Where You Stand Depend on Where You Sit?” State & Local Government Review 17 (2): 232–234.
   Google Scholar
• Blekesaune, M. 2007. “Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies.” European Sociological Review 23 (3): 393–403. doi:10.1093/esr/jcm012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, A. O. 2017. “The State-Local Government(s) Conundrum: Power and Design.” The Journal of Politics 70 (4): 1119–1129. doi:10.1086/693475.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, N., and J. A. Tucker. 2019. “Staring at the West Through Kremlin-Tinted Glasses: Russian Mass and Elite Divergence in Attitudes Toward the United States, European Union, and Ukraine Before and After Crimea.” Post-Soviet Affairs 35 (5–6): 365–375. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2019.1660491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. H. 2012. “Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit: Bureaucratic Politics in Federal Workplace Agencies Serving Undocumented Workers.” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 22 (2): 227–298. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2019181.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fina, S., B. Heider, M. Mattila, P. Rautiainen, M.W. Sihvola, and K. Vatanen. 2021. Unequal Finland. Regional Socio-Economic Disparities in Finland. Stockholm: FES Nordic Countries.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, S., O. Hyvärinen, M. Mattila, and H. Wass. 2010. “The Politics of Competitive Tendering: Political Orientation and Attitudes Towards Contracting Out Among Finnish Local Politicians.” Local Government Studies 36 (5): 637–654. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.506977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and J. Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giritli Nygren, K., and S. Nyhlén. 2017. “Mapping the Ruling Relations of Work in Rural Eldercare Intersections of Gender, Digitalization and the Center-Periphery Divide.” Journal of Rural Studies 54: 337–343. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, N. 1997. Privatisering i princip och praktik. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Haveri, A. 2015. “Nordic Local Government: A Success Story, but Will It Last?” International Journal of Public Sector Management 28 (2): 136–149. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-09-2014-0118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveri, A., J. Airaksinen, and H. Paananen. 2015. Uuden sukupolven kuntajohtajat. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Heinelt, H. 2013. “Introduction: The Role Perception and Behaviour of Municipal Councillors in the Changing Context of Local Democracy.” Local Government Studies 39 (5): 633–639. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.670745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirvonen, T., P. Karhila, and P. Saukkonen. 2016. Monikeskuksiset ARTTU-kunnat, Arttu2-tutkimusohjelman julkaisusarja, Nro 6/2016. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J., and D. Sweeting. 2007. “Addressing the Legitimacy of the Council-Manager Executive in Local Government.” Local Government Studies 33 (5): 633–656. doi:10.1080/03003930701627316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. 2010. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Second Edition ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jae-Won, Y., and D. S. Wright. 1994. “Public Administration Education and Formal Administrative Position: Do They Make a Difference? A Note on Pope’s Proposition and Miles’ Law in an Intergovernmental Context.” Public Administration Review 54 (4): 357–363. doi:10.2307/977383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, N., and S. Kumlin. 2017. “Election Campaign Agendas, Government Partisanship, and the Welfare State.” European Political Science Review 9 (2): 183–208. doi:10.1017/S175577391500034X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jann, B. 2014. “Plotting Regression Coefficients and Other Estimates.” The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics & Stata 14 (4): 708–737. doi:10.1177/1536867X1401400402.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C., and R. J. Franzese. 2009. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, L. 2010. The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsmeyer, C., and T. Nordstrom. 2003. “East versus West: Comparing Political Attitudes and Welfare Preferences Across European Societies.” Journal of European Public Policy 10 (3): 339–364. doi:10.1080/1350176032000085342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L. J. 1988. “Privatization: Towards a Concept for Comparative Policy Analysis.” Journal of Public Policy 8 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00006826.
   Google Scholar
• Machol, R. 1978. “Principles of Operations Research.” Interfaces 8 (2): 86–87. doi:10.1287/inte.8.2.86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, K. P., and C. M. Jones. 2017. “Breaking Miles’ Law: The Curious Case of Hillary Clinton the Hawk.” Foreign Policy Analysis 13 (3): 541–560. doi:10.1111/fpa.12073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meklin, P., A. Koski, M. Pekola-Sjöblom, and J. Airaksinen. 2020. Finnish Local Government Reforms from a Research Perspective. The Final Report of the ARTTU2 Research Programme. ARTTU2 Research Programme Studies No. 8. ACTA 277. Helsinki: Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E. 1978. “The Origin and Meaning of Miles’ Law.” Public Administration Review 38 (5): 399–403. doi:10.2307/975497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisio, A., and R. Uusitalo. 2013. “The Impact of Municipal Mergers on Local Public Expenditures in Finland.” Public Finance and Management 13 (3): 148–166.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, P. E., and J. Svara. 2002. Leadership at the Apex: Politicians and Administrators in Western Local Governments. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K. 1984. “Is Small Really so Beautiful? Is Big Really so Ugly? Size, Effectiveness and Democracy in Local Government.” Political Studies 30 (2): 190–206. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1982.tb00532.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård, M. 2006. “Welfare-Ideological Change in Scandinavia: A Comparative Analysis of Partisan Welfare State Positions in Four Nordic Countries, 1970-2003.” Scandinavian Political Studies 29 (4): 356–385. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00156.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. 1970. “Local Budgeting, Decision-Making or a Ritual Act?” Scandinavian Political Studies 5 (A5): 85–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1970.tb00473.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, L. H., R. T. Pedersen, and Y. Bhatti. 2018. “When Less is More: On Politicians’ Attitudes to Remuneration.” Public Administration 96 (4): 668–689. doi:10.1111/padm.12547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., A. Røiseland, B. G. Peters, and A. Gustavsen. 2017. “Comparing Local politicians’ and bureaucrats’ Assessments of Democratic Participation: The Cases of Norway and Sweden.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (4): 658–675. doi:10.1177/0020852315598214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikkala, S., ed. 1997. Kunnat ja päättäjät. KuntaSuomi2004-tutkimuksia nro 9. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Pikkala, S. 2005. Kunta päättäjän perspektiivistä. Tutkimus kuntien luottamushenkilöistä ja viranhaltijoista 1995-2003. KuntaSuomi 2004-tutkimuksia nro 54, ACTA nro 176. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Røiseland, A. 2016. “User Choice – Blessing or Curse? Exploring Democratic Participation in Swedish and Norwegian Local Governments.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 20 (4): 27–51.
   Google Scholar
• Rokkan, S. 1999. State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan: Based on His Collected Works. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, S. 1997. “Mitä mieltä luottamushenkilöt ja viranhaltijat ovat kunnallisista palveluista?.” In Kunnat ja päättäjät, edited by S. Pikkala, 56–82. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, S. 2012. Paras-uudistus kuntapäättäjän silmin. Paras-ARTTU-tutkimusohjelman tutkimuksia nro 20, Acta nro 235. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M., A. Lidström, and Y. Bae. 2020. Multilevel Democracy. How Local Institutions and Civil Society Shape the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund, P. 2020. “Electoral Volatility: Finland in a Comparative Perspective”. In Politiikan ilmastomuutos. Eduskuntavaalitutkimus 2019, In edited by, S. Borg, E. Kestilä-Kekkonen, and H. Wass, 461–476. Helsinki: Oikeusministeriö.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhlberg, K. 1997. “Kuntien kehittämispolitiikka. Mitä, missä ja kenen toimesta?” In Kunnat ja päättäjät, edited by S. Pikkala, 83–102. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J., M. Buck, and H. Bjørnå. 2019. “The Centre-Periphery Dimension and Trust in Politicians: The Case of Norway.” Territory, Politics, Governance 9 (1): 37–55. doi:10.1080/21622671.2019.1624191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman, R. 1999. “’where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit’ (Or, Yes, Miles´ Law Also Applies to Public Administration Basic Texts.” The American Review of Public Administration 29 (1): 92–97. doi:10.1177/02750749922064292.
   Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. 2011. “A Bedrock of Support? Trends in Welfare State Attitudes in Sweden, 1981-2010.” Social Policy & Administration 45 (7): 806–825. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00796.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vabo, S. I. 2000. “New Organisational Solutions in Norwegian Local Councils: Leaving a Puzzling Role for Local Politicians?” Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (4): 343–372. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.00041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Schoultz, Å., and A. Papageorgiou. 2019. “Policy or Person? The Electoral Value of Policy Positions and Personal Attributes in the Finnish Open-List System.” Party Politics 27 (4): 767–778. doi:10.1177/1354068819891048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., G. A. Brewer, G. A. Boyne, and C. N. Avellaneda. 2011. “Market Orientation and Public Service Performance: New Public Management Gone Mad?” Public Administration Review 71 (5): 707–717. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A., and N. Caiden. 2001. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. New York: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar