Weak evidence for personality and behavioural syndrome in Teleogryllus commodus crickets

References

• Anestis SF. 2005. Behavioral style, dominance rank, and urinary cortisol in young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour. 142(9/10):1245–1268.
   Google Scholar
• Balsam JS, Stevenson PA. 2021. Agonistic experience during development establishes inter-individual differences in approach-avoidance behaviour of crickets. Scientific Reports. 11(1):16702. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96201-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. 67(1):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AM. 2007. Future directions in behavioural syndromes research. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 274(1611):755–761. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL. 2009. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour. 77(4):771–783. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AM, Sih A. 2007. Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecology Letters. 10(9):828–834. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01081.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boake CRB. 1989. Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evolutionary Ecology. 3:173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briffa M, Sneddon LU, Wilson AJ. 2015. Animal personality as a cause and consequence of contest behaviour. Biology Letters. 11(3):20141007. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WD, Smith AT, Moskalik B, Gabriel J. 2006. Aggressive contests in house crickets: size, motivation and the information content of aggressive songs. Animal Behaviour. 72(1):225–233. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner P. 2017. Brms: an R package for Bayessian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software. 80(1):1–28. doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DJ, Shipp E. 1979. Regulation of spatial pattern in populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Walker). Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie. 51(3):260–268. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00688.x.
   Google Scholar
• Carere C, Drent PJ, Privitera L, Koolhaas JM, Groothuis TGG. 2005. Personalities in great tits, Parus major: stability and consistency. Animal Behaviour. 70(4):795–805. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.003.
   Google Scholar
• Carere C, Maestripieri D. 2013. Animal personalities: behavior, physiology, and evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter AJ, Feeney WE, Marshall HH, Cowlishaw G, Heinsohn R. 2013. Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring? Biological Reviews. 88(2):465–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter AJ, Marshall HH, Heinsohn R, Cowlishaw G. 2012. How not to measure boldness: novel object and antipredator responses are not the same in wild baboons. Animal Behaviour. 84(3):603–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C, Teo HY, Norma-Rashid Y, Li D. 2017. Predator personality and prey behavioural predictability jointly determine foraging performance. Scientific Reports. 7(1):40734. doi:10.1038/srep40734.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen B, Liu K, Zhou L, Gomes-Silva G, Sommer-Trembo C, Plath M. 2018. Personality differentially affects individual mate choice decisions in female and male Western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). PLoS One. 13(5):e0197197. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Vickery VR, Kevan DK. 1967. A morphological comparison of antipodean Teleogryllus species. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 45:1215–1224.
   Google Scholar
• Colléter M, Brown C. 2011. Personality traits predict hierarchy rank in male rainbowfish social groups. Animal Behaviour. 81(6):1231–1237. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall SRX, Houston AI, McNamara JM. 2004. The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecology Letters. 7(8):734–739. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00618.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dammhahn M, Almeling L. 2012. Is risk taking during foraging a personality trait? A field test for cross-context consistency in boldness. Animal Behaviour. 84(5):1131–1139. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David M, Cézilly F. 2011. Personality may confound common measures of mate-choice. PLoS One. 6(9):e24778. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse NJ, Réale D. 2005. Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour. 142(9/10):1159–1184.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M. 2010. Recent models for adaptive personality differences: a review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 365(1560):3947–3958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochtermann NA, Jenkins SH. 2007. Behavioural syndromes in Merriam’s kangaroo rats (Dipodomys merriami): a test of competing hypotheses. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 274(1623):2343–2349. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochtermann NA, Nelson AB. 2014. Multiple facets of exploratory behavior in house crickets (Acheta domesticus): split personalities or simply different behaviors? Ethology. 120(11):1110–1117. doi:10.1111/eth.12284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth RA. 2006. Behavioral correlations across breeding contexts provide a mechanism for a cost of aggression. Behavioral Ecology. 17(6):1011–1019. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccard JA, Liesenjohann T, Dammhahn M. 2020. Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk. Oecologia. 194(4):621–634. doi:10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans AR. 1983. A study of the behaviour of the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Walker) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) in the field and in habitat simulations. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie. 62(4):269–290. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1983.tb02157.x.
   Google Scholar
• Friard O, Gamba M. 2016. BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg B, Allee WC. 1942. Some effects of conditioning on social dominance and subordination in inbred strains of mice. Physiological Zoology. 4:22.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber C. 2009. Behavioural variation in the field cricket (Gryllus integer), what is the role of heritable components? [Dipl, uniwien]. http://othes.univie.ac.at/7883/.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick AV, Kortet R. 2012. Sex differences in the repeatability of boldness over metamorphosis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 66(3):407–412. doi:10.1007/s00265-011-1286-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL. 2006. Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biological Reviews. 81(1):33–74. doi:10.1017/S146479310500686X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JC, Sih A. 2005. Precopulatory sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): a role for behavioral syndromes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 58(4):390–396. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0943-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar F, Whiting MJ, Noble DWA. 2016. Influence of prior contest experience and level of escalation on contest outcome. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 70(10):1679–1687. doi:10.1007/s00265-016-2173-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern EMA, Robinson D, Gass E, Godwin J, Langerhans RB. 2016. Correlated evolution of personality, morphology and performance. Animal Behaviour. 117:79–86. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazraı̈e K, Campan M. 1999. The role of prior agonistic experience in dominance relationships in male crickets Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behavioural Processes. 44(3):341–348. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(98)00058-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortet R, Hedrick A. 2007. A behavioural syndrome in the field cricket Gryllus integer: intrasexual aggression is correlated with activity in a novel environment. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 91(3):475–482. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00812.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lihoreau M, Brepson L, Rivault C. 2009. The weight of the clan: even in insects, social isolation can induce a behavioural syndrome. Behavioural Processes. 82(1):81–84. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay JR, Haskell MJ. 2015. Consistent individual behavioral variation: the difference between temperament, personality and behavioral syndromes. Animals. 5(3):455–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JGA, Réale D. 2008. Temperament, risk assessment and habituation to novelty in eastern chipmunks, Tamias striatus. Animal Behaviour. 75(1):309–318. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.05.026.
   Google Scholar
• McElreath R, Luttbeg B, Fogarty SP, Brodin T, Sih A. 2007. Evolution of animal personalities. Nature. 450:E5. doi:10.1038/nature06326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelangeli M, Chapple DG, Goulet CT, Bertram MG, Wong BBM. 2019. Behavioral syndromes vary among geographically distinct populations in a reptile. Behavioral Ecology. 30(2):393–401. doi:10.1093/beheco/ary178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowles SL, Cotton PA, Briffa M. 2012. Consistent crustaceans: the identification of stable behavioural syndromes in hermit crabs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 66(7):1087–1094. doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1359-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2010. Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews. 85(4):935–956. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00141.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemelä PT, DiRienzo N, Hedrick AV. 2012. Predator-induced changes in the boldness of naïve field crickets, Gryllus integer, depends on behavioural type. Animal Behaviour. 84(1):129–135. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemelä PT, Lattenkamp EZ, Dingemanse NJ. 2015. Personality-related survival and sampling bias in wild cricket nymphs. Behavioral Ecology. 26(3):936–946. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perals D, Griffin AS, Bartomeus I, Sol D. 2017. Revisiting the open-field test: what does it really tell us about animal personality? Animal Behaviour. 123:69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price T, Langen T. 1992. Evolution of correlated characters. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 7(9):307–310. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90229-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Réale D, Garant D, Humphries MM, Bergeron P, Careau V, Montiglio P-O. 2010. Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 365(1560):4051–4063. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reaney LT, Drayton JM, Jennions MD. 2011. The role of body size and fighting experience in predicting contest behaviour in the black field cricket. Teleogryllus commodus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 65(2):217–225. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1030-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose J, Cullen DA, Simpson SJ, Stevenson PA. 2017. Born to win or bred to lose: aggressive and submissive behavioural profiles in crickets. Animal Behaviour. 123:441–450. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudin FS, Briffa M. 2012. Is boldness a resource-holding potential trait? Fighting prowess and changes in startle response in the sea anemone, Actinia equina. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279(1735):1904–1910. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santostefano F, Wilson AJ, Araya-Ajoy YG, Dingemanse NJ. 2016. Interacting with the enemy: indirect effects of personality on conspecific aggression in crickets. Behavioral Ecology. 27(4):1235–1246. doi:10.1093/beheco/arw037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf I, Stoldt M, Libbrecht R, Höpfner AL, Jongepier E, Kever M, Foitzik S. 2021. Social isolation causes downregulation of immune and stress response genes and behavioural changes in a social insect. Molecular Ecology. 30(10):2378–2389. doi:10.1111/mec.15902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC. 2004a. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 19(7):372–378. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC, Ziemba RE. 2004b. Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 79(3):241–277. doi:10.1086/422893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A, Mathot KJ, Moirón M, Montiglio P-O, Wolf M, Dingemanse NJ. 2015. Animal personality and state–behaviour feedbacks: a review and guide for empiricists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 30(1):50–60. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahlschmidt Z, O’Leary ME, Adamo S. 2014. Food limitation leads to risky decision making and to tradeoffs with oviposition. Behavioral Ecology. 25(1):223–227. doi:10.1093/beheco/art110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapley J, Keogh JS. 2005. Behavioral syndromes influence mating systems: floater pairs of a lizard have heavier offspring. Behavioral Ecology. 16(3):514–520. doi:10.1093/beheco/ari019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan MK, Chang C, Tan HTW. 2018. Shy herbivores forage more efficiently than bold ones regardless of information-processing overload. Behavioural Processes. 149:52–58. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traisnel G, Pichegru L. 2019. Boldness at the nest predicts foraging and diving behaviour of female but not male African penguins. Animal Behaviour. 150:113–125. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oers K, Mueller JC. 2010. Evolutionary genomics of animal personality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 365(1560):3991–4000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson ADM, Whattam EM, Bennett R, Visanuvimol L, Lauzon C, Bertram SM. 2010. Behavioral correlations across activity, mating, exploration, aggression, and antipredator contexts in the European house cricket, Acheta domesticus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 64(5):703–715. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0888-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf M, Weissing FJ. 2010. An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 365(1560):3959–3968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong K, Elegante M, Bartels B, Elkhayat S, Tien D, Roy S, Goodspeed J, Suciu C, Tan J, Grimes C, et al. 2010. Analyzing habituation responses to novelty in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behavioural Brain Research. 208(2):450–457. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar