Fostering responsible anticipation in engineering ethics education: how a multi-disciplinary enrichment of the responsible innovation framework can help

References

• Amsler, S., and K. Facer. 2017. “Contesting Anticipatory Regimes in Education: Exploring Alternative Educational Orientations to the Future.” Futures 94: 6–14. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, Jan Peter. 2014. “On Engineers Engaging Ethics Through Dis-location and Reconnection.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 242–244. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922342.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent, and Pieter Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2, edited by B. J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brey, Philip. 2012. “Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies.” Nanoethics 6 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11569-012-0141-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, Erin A. 2013. “The (mis) Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think About Social Injustices.” In Engineering Education for Social Justice, edited by Juan Lucena, 67–84. Dordrecth: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coursey, Kino, Susan Pirzchalski, Matt McMullen, Guile Lindroth, and Yuri Furuushi. 2019. “Living with Harmony: A Personal Companion System by Realbotix™.” In AI Love You, edited by Yuefang Zhou and Martin H. Fischer, 77–95. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dotson, K. 2011. “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing.” Hypatia 26 (2): 236–257. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2015. Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, Fábio, and Carlo Ratti. 2018. “The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Cities: A Review.” Journal of Urban Technology 25 (4): 3–18. doi:10.1080/10630732.2018.1493883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epting, Shane. 2019. “Automated Vehicles and Transportation Justice.” Philosophy & Technology 32 (3): 389–403. doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0307-5.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Erik, David Guston, and Brenda Trindidad. 2019. “Making Reponsible Innovators.” In Does America Need More Innovators?, edited by Matthew H. Wisnioski, Eric S. Hintz and Marie S. Kleine, 345–366. Lemelson Center Studies in Invention and Innovation Series. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, S., W. Pearce, C. McLeod, B. Gibbs, S. Connelly, J. Couto, T. Moreira, et al. 2016. The TERRAIN Tool for Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, Stephen. 2015Science and Democracy Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond.” In Science and Democracy Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond, edited by Stephen Hilgarten, Clark Miller, and Rob Hagendijk, 33–55. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoople, Gordon. 2014. “Engineering Ethics in Every Decision.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 241–242. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922341.
   Google Scholar
• Jamison, A., A. Kolmas, and J. E. Holgaard. 2014. “Hybrid Learning: An Integrative Approach to Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 103: 253–273. doi:10.1002/jee.20041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41: 223–244. doi:10.1023/A:1025557512320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. 2014. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, K. S., R. Steward, and L. Crane. 2019. “‘People Should be Allowed to Do What They Like’: Autistic Adults’ Views and Experiences of Stimming.” Autism 23 (7): 1782–1792. doi:10.1177/1362361319829628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittay, Eva Feder. 2008. “Ideal Theory Bioethics and the Exclusion of People with Severe Cognitive Disabilties.” In Naturalized – Toward Responsible Knowing and Practice, edited by H. Lindemann, M. Verkerk and M. Urban Walker. Cambridge: Camrbidge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, Eva Feder. 2009. “The Personal is Philosophical is Political: A Philosopher and Mother of a Cognitively Disabled Person Sends Notes from the Battlefield.” Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4): 606–627. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01600.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepore, Jill. 2021. “Elon Musk: The Evening Rocket.” Season One Episode One, November 29. Pushkin. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/elon-musk-the-evening-rocket.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, David. 2009. Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Margherita, Nulli, and Stahl Bernd. 2018. “RRI in Higher Education.” The ORBIT Journal 1 (4): 1–8. doi:10.29297/orbit.v1i4.78.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, Lavinia, and Steffen Steinert. 2022. “Twisted Thinking: Technology, Values and Critical Thinking.” Prometheus 38 (1). doi:10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0124.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, Richard T. 2017. “Confronting Emerging New Technology.” The Journal of Mind and Behavior Summer and Autumn 2017, Volume 38, Numbers 3 and 4: 247–270.
   Google Scholar
• McGeer, Victoria. 2009. “The Thought and Talk of Individuals with Autism: Reflections on Ian Hacking.” Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4): 517–530. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01601.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, Niels, Malene Vinther Christensen, Roger Strand, Ivan Buljan, Mar Carrió, Erich Griessler Marta Cayetano i Giralt, et al. 2019. “Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation: A Phronetic Perspective.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (2): 597–615. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0029-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., and K. Mrkva. 2014. “The Development of Moral Imagination.” In The Ethics of Creativity, edited by S. Moran, D. Cropley, and J. C. Kaufman, 25–45. Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature. doi:10.1057/9781137333544.0007.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Jack Stilgoe, Phil Macnaghten, Mike Gorman, Erik Fisher, and Dave Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, Vol. 31, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heitz, 27–50. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Jennifer, Annie E. Hale, and Leanna M. Archambault. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Education: Integrating Values and Technology in the Classroom.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 98–103. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1510713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robaey, Zoë. 2014. “A Commentary on Engineering Ethics Education, or How to Bring About Change Without Needing Scandals.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 248–249. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922345.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, Gemma, Núria Saladie, Gema Revuelta, Clara Vizuete, Carolina Llorente, and Mar Carriò. 2018. “Responsible Research and Innovation: An Opportunity to Develop Creative Skills at Higher Education.” In 4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’18). València: Universitat Polite`cnica de València. doi:10.4995/HEAd18.2018.8187.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, Sabine. 2010. “Intuitions, Emotions and Gut Reactions in Decisions About Risks: Towards a Different Interpretation of ‘Neuroethics’.” Journal of Risk Research 13 (2): 175–190. doi:10.1080/13669870903126275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shew, Ashley. 2020. “Ableism, Technoableism, and Future AI.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 39 (1): 40–85. doi:10.1109/MTS.2020.2967492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruit, Shannon. 2014. “Responsible Innovation Through Ethics Education: Educating to Change Research Practice.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 246–247. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922344.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, T., L. Marin, and J. van Grunsven. 2020a. “Before Responsible Innovation: Teaching Anticipation as an Intellectual Virtue for Engineers.” In Engaging Engineering Education: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Conference of the European Society or Engineering Education (SEFI), edited by J. van der Veen, and H.-M. Järvinen, 1401–1408. ISBN: 978-2-87352-020-5.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, T., F. Santoni de Sio, and P. Vermaas. 2020b. “Driving in the Dark: Designing Autonomous Vehicles for Reducing Light Pollution.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (1): 387–403. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00101-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland, M. E. 2014. “Taking Emotion Seriously: Meeting Students Where They Are.” Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1): 183–195. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9427-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Holter, Carolyn. 2022. “Participatory Design: Lessons and Directions for Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (2): 275–290. doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2041801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbrello, S. 2020. “Imaginative Value Sensitive Design: Using Moral Imagination Theory to Inform Responsible Technology Design.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2): 575–595. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00104-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallor, Shannon. 2016. Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoven, Jeroen. 2013. “Value Sensitive Design and Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant and M. Heintz, 75–83. West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoven, Jeroen. 2017. “The Design Turn in Applied Ethics.” In Designing in Ethcis, edited by J. van den Hoven, S. Miller and T. Pogge, 11–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, Ibo. 2016. “An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3): 667–686. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9724-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel, Ibo. 2020. “Three Philosophical Perspectives on the Relation Between Technology and Society, and How They Affect the Current Debate About Artificial Intelligence.” Human Affairs 30 (4): 499–451. doi:10.1515/humaff-2020-0042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Grunsven, J. 2022. “Anticipating Sex Robots: A Critique of the Sociotechnical Vanguard Vision of Sex Robots as ‘Good Companions’.” In Being and Value in Technology, edited by Enrico Terrone and Vera Tripodi, 63–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Grunsven, J., and S. Roeser. 2022. “AAC Technology, Autism, and the Empathic Turn.” Social Epistemology 36 (1): 95–110. doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1897189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Grunsven, J. B., L. Marin, T. W. Stone, S. Roeser, and N. Doorn. 2021. “How to Teach Engineering Ethics? A Retrospective and Prospective Sketch of TU Delft’s Approach to Engineering Ethics Education.” Advances in Engineering Education 9 (4). doi:10.18260/3-1-1153-25254.
   Google Scholar
• Van Grunsven, J., L. Marin, T. Stone, S. Roeser, and N. Doorn. 2023. “How Engineers Can Care from a Distance.” In Thinking Through Science and Technology: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics in an Engineered World, edited by Glen Miller, Helena Mateus Jeronimo and Qin Zhu, 141–163. Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Wisnioski, Matthew, Eric S. Hintz, and Marie Stettler Kleine, eds. 2019. Does America Need More Innovators? Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• York, Emily, and Shannon N. Conley. 2020. “Creative Anticipatory Ethical Reasoning with Scenario Analysis and Design Fiction.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6): 2985–3016. doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00253-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar