Laboratory learning objectives: ranking objectives across the cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains within engineering

References

• Almeida, L. M. S., K. H. Becker, and I. Villanueva. 2021. “Engineering Communication in Industry and Cross-Generational Challenges: An Exploratory Study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (3): 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1737646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., et al. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S. P. 2013. Taxonomy Circles: Visualizing the Possibilities of Intended Learning Outcomes. London: BPP University.
   Google Scholar
• Avila, D. T., W. Van Petegem, and A. Libotton. 2021. “ASEST Framework: A Proposal for Improving Teamwork by Making Cohesive Software Engineering Student Teams.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (5): 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1863339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, B., and P. C. Woods. 2013. “A Comparative Study on Real lab and Simulation lab in Communication Engineering from Students’ Perspectives.” European Journal of Engineering Education 38 (2): 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.755499
   Google Scholar
• Behera, A. K., R. A. de Sousa, V. Oleksik, J. Dong, and D. Fritzen. 2023. “Student Perceptions of Remote Learning Transitions in Engineering Disciplines During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-National Study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 48 (1): 110–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, J. 2010. “Insightful Learning in the Laboratory: Some Experiences from 10 Years of Designing and Using Conceptual Labs.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (3): 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043791003739759
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, J. 2018. “What Matters for Students’ Learning in the Laboratory? Do Not Neglect the Role of Experimental Equipment!.” Instructional Science 46 (6): 819–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9469-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BHP. 2023. BHP Operational Review for the Half Year Ended 31 December 2022. https://www.bhp.com/-/media/documents/media/reports-and-presentations/2023/230119_bhpoperationalreviewforthehalfyear31december2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, P. A. 1996. Testing and Assessment in Occupational and Technical Education. New York: ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Brinson, J. R. 2015. “Learning Outcome Achievement in non-Traditional (Virtual and Remote) Versus Traditional (Hands-on) Laboratories: A Review of the Empirical Research.” Computers & Education 87: 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerri, S. T. 2016. The Fully Integrated Engineer: Combining Technical Ability and Leadership Prowess, 1st ed. (IEEE PCS Professional Engineering Communication Series). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ekin, S., J. F. O’Hara, E. Turgut, N. Colston, and J. L. Young. 2021. “A Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Light Wave Sensing and Communication Project: Low-Cost, Portable, Effective, and Fun.” IEEE Transactions on Education 64 (3): 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.3029543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elawady, Y., and A. S. Tolba. 2009. “Educational Objectives of Different Laboratory Types: A Comparative Study.” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security 6 (2): 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Faulconer, E. K., and A. B. Gruss. 2018. “A Review to Weigh the Pros and Cons of Online, Remote, and Distance Science Laboratory Experiences.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19 (2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feisel, L. D., and A. J. Rosa. 2005. “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1): 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, S., F. Konietschke, and M. Pauly. 2019. “Resampling-Based Analysis of Multivariate Data and Repeated Measures Designs with the R Package MANOVA.RM.” The R Journal 11 (2): 380. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2019-051
   Google Scholar
• Gamo, J. 2019. “Assessing a Virtual Laboratory in Optics as a Complement to On-Site Teaching.” IEEE Transactions on Education 62 (2): 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2871617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Loro, F., et al. 2021. “Laboratories 4.0: Laboratories for Emerging Demands Under Industry 4.0 Paradigm.” 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 903–909.
   Google Scholar
• Girotto, M., and A. Oliveira. 2022. “Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of the Development of Generic Competences and Their Relevance to the Engineering Profession.” European Journal of Engineering Education 47 (6): 1061–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2113763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Ortiz, F. J., J. J. Fitzpatrick, and E. P. Byrne. 2021. “Development of Contemporary Engineering Graduate Attributes Through Open-Ended Problems and Activities.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (3): 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1803216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwynne-Evans, A. J., M. Chetty, and S. Junaid. 2021. “Repositioning Ethics at the Heart of Engineering Graduate Attributes.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 26 (1): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2021.1913882
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. J. 1997. “Student Learning and Assessment Are Inextricably Linked.” European Journal of Engineering Education 22 (4): 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799708923471
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, M., L. Romero, M. Domínguez, and M. del Mar Espinosa. 2015. “5S Methodology Implementation in the Laboratories of an Industrial Engineering University School.” Safety Science 78: 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ka Yuk Chan, C. 2012. “Laboratory Learning.” In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, edited by N. M. Seel, 1705–1708. Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Kollöffel, B., and T. de Jong. 2013. “Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Circuits in Secondary Vocational Engineering Education: Combining Traditional Instruction with Inquiry Learning in a Virtual Lab.” Journal of Engineering Education 102 (3): 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, S., Lucey Anthony D., Lindsay Euan D., Sarukkalige Priyantha R., Mocerino Mauro, Treagust David F., Zadnik Marjan G. 2017. “An Alternative Approach to Student Assessment for Engineering–Laboratory Learning.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 22 (2): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2018.1435202
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, E. D., and M. C. Good. 2005. “Effects of Laboratory Access Modes upon Learning Outcomes.” IEEE Transactions on Education 48 (4): 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2005.852591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loui, M. C. 2016. “Board Changes and Neglected Research Topics.” Journal of Engineering Education 105 (1): 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. 1943. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50 (4). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
   Google Scholar
• Masoud, M. I. 2017. “Writing a Laboratory Report for Senior Electrical Engineering Courses: Guidelines and Recommendations.” 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 340–346. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• May, D., et al. 2021. “Switching from Hands-on Labs to Exclusively Online Experimentation in Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses.” 2021 ASEE virtual annual conference.
   Google Scholar
• May, D., G. R. Alves, A. A. Kist, and S. M. Zvacek. 2023. Online Laboratories in Engineering Education Research and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Morshead, R. W. 1965. “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain.
   Google Scholar
• Nedic, Z., A. Nafalski, and J. Machotka. 2010. “Motivational Project-Based Laboratory for a Common First Year Electrical Engineering Course.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (4): 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.490579
   Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S. 2015. “Understanding How Students Use and Appreciate Online Resources in the Teaching Laboratory.” International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE) 11 (4): 8–13. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v11i4.4562
   Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S., et al. 2022a. “An Australian University Comparison of Engineering Laboratory Learning Objectives Rankings.” Presented at the 33rd Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S., et al. 2022b. “A European vs Australasian Comparison of Engineering Laboratory Learning Objectives Rankings.” SEFI 50th annual conference, Barcelona, Spain. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI).
   Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S., S. Daniel, R. Haque, M. Belkina, G. M. Hassan, S. Grundy, S. Lyden, P. Neal, and C. Sandison. 2023. “ChatGPT Versus Engineering Education Assessment: A Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Benchmarking and Analysis of This Generative Artificial Intelligence Tool to Investigate Assessment Integrity.” European Journal of Engineering Education 48: 559–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S., C. Ritz, P. J. Vial, M. Ros, and D. Stirling. 2015. “Decoding Student Satisfaction: How to Manage and Improve the Laboratory Experience.” IEEE Transactions on Education 58 (3): 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2346474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S., M. Ros, K. Jovanovic, and Z. Stanisavljevic. 2021. “Remote, Simulation or Traditional Engineering Teaching Laboratory: A Systematic Literature Review of Assessment Implementations to Measure Student Achievement or Learning.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (6): 1141–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1990864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S., T. Suesse, K. Jovanovic, and Z. Stanisavljevic. 2021. “Laboratory Learning Objectives Measurement: Relationships Between Student Evaluation Scores and Perceived Learning.” IEEE Transactions on Education 64 (2): 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.3022666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S., P. J. Vial, M. Ros, D. Stirling, and C. Ritz. 2015. “Improving the Laboratory Learning Experience: A Process to Train and Manage Teaching Assistants.” IEEE Transactions on Education 58 (2): 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2335712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish, D. R. 2015. “The Relevance of Emotional Intelligence for Leadership in a Higher Education Context.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (5): 821–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S. M., and K. J. Crippen. 2021. “Virtual Laboratories in Undergraduate Science and Engineering Courses: A Systematic Review, 2009–2019.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 30: 16–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RioTinto. 2022. Annual Report 2021. https://www.riotinto.com/-/media/content/documents/Invest/Reports/Annual-reports/Annual-report-2021/RT-Annual-report-2021.pdf?rev=0cc3e78061c341aca710df4c1a5e2ed3.
   Google Scholar
• Salim, K. R., R. Ali, N. H. Hussain, and H. N. Haron. 2013. “An Instrument for Measuring the Learning Outcomes of Laboratory Work.” Presented at the International Engineering and Technology Education Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Shyr, W.-J. 2010. “Multiprog Virtual Laboratory Applied to PLC Programming Learning.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (5): 573–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.497550
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, E. J. 1972. “The Classification of Educational Objectives, Psychomotor Domain.”
   Google Scholar
• Soomro, S. A., H. Casakin, and G. V. Georgiev. 2022. “A Systematic Review on FabLab Environments and Creativity: Implications for Design.” Buildings 12 (6): 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Clair, S., D. Kim, and C. Riley. 2021. “Undergraduates’ Perspectives on Readiness, Writing Transfer, and Effectiveness of Writing Instructions in Engineering Lab Report Writing.” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanovic, M., D. Tadic, S. Nestic, and A. Djordjevic. 2015. “An Assessment of Distance Learning Laboratory Objectives for Control Engineering Education.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 23 (2): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger, F., A. Nitsche, A. Arbesmeier, K. D. Brade, H. Schweiger, and I. Belski. 2020. “Teaching Battery Basics in Laboratories: Hands-On Versus Simulated Experiments.” IEEE Transactions on Education 63 (3): 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.2970554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, S. 2017. The EQ Leader: Instilling Passion, Creating Shared Goals, and Building Meaningful Organizations Through Emotional Intelligence. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stransky, J., C. A. Bodnar, M. Cooper, D. Anastasio, and D. Burkey. 2021. “Authentic Process Safety Decisions in an Engineering Ethics Context: Expression of Student Moral Development Within Surveys and Immersive Environments.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 26 (1): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1809881
   Google Scholar
• Trevelyan, J. 2014. The Making of an Expert Engineer. London: CRC Press/Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Trevelyan, J. P. 2021. Learning Engineering Practice. Leiden: CRC Press/Blakema.
   Google Scholar
• U. O. Waterloo. 2022. Bloom's Taxonomy. Centre for Teaching Excellence, University of Waterloo. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/planning-courses-and-assignments/blooms-taxonomy.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, A., S. Lowenhoff, M. Marinelli, S. Male, and G. M. Hassan. 2020. “Building Students’ Nascent Understanding of Ethics in Engineering Practice.” European Journal of Engineering Education 45 (6): 957–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1793913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez, E. S., M. J. Dewitt, Z. J. West, and M. J. Elsass. 2020. “Impact of Team Formation Approach on Teamwork Effectiveness and Performance in an Upper-Level Undergraduate Chemical Engineering Laboratory Course.” Int. J. Eng. Educ 36: 491–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojinovic, O., V. Simic, I. Milentijevic, and V. Ciric. 2020. “Tiered Assignments in Lab Programming Sessions: Exploring Objective Effects on Students’ Motivation and Performance.” IEEE Transactions on Education 63 (3): 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2961647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, D. 2006. “Promoting Independent Learning Skills Using Video on Digital Language Laboratories.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 19 (4-5): 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220601043180
   Google Scholar
• Wahab, N. A. A., Nur Athyratul Aqila, Norain Isa, Nurul Izza Husin, Azrinawati Mohd Zin, Marina Mokhtar, and Nur Maizatul Azra Mukhtar. 2021. “A Systematic Review on Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control in Academic Laboratory.” Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology 24 (1): 47–62. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.24.1.4762.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, T. 2010. “Assessing Student Learning in a Virtual Laboratory Environment.” IEEE Transactions on Education 53 (2): 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2008.2012114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K., P. E. Slaboch, and R. Jamshidi. 2022. “Technical Writing Improvements Through Engineering lab Courses.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 50 (1): 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419020939621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., and A. R. Moylan. 2009. “Self-regulation: Where Metacognition and Motivation Intersect.” In Handbook of Metacognition in Education, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 311–328. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar