Application of gamified virtual laboratories as a preparation tool for civil engineering students

References

• Abdulwahed, M., and Z. K. Nagy. 2014. “The Impact of Different Preparation Modes on Enhancing the Undergraduate Process Control Engineering Laboratory: A Comparative Study.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 22 (1): 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/CAE.20536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achuthan, K., and S. S. Murali. 2015. “A Comparative Study of Educational Laboratories from Cost & Learning Effectiveness Perspective.” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 349: 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18473-9_15.
   Google Scholar
• Aliane, N., R. Pastor, and G. Mariscal. 2010. “Limitations of Remote Laboratories in Control Engineering Education.” International Journal of Online Engineering 6 (1): 31–33. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v6i1.1131.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhaldi, T., I. Pranata, and R. I. Athauda. 2016. “A Review of Contemporary Virtual and Remote Laboratory Implementations: Observations and Findings.” Journal of Computers in Education 3 (3): 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40692-016-0068-Z.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. E., and S. D. Barker. 2020. “BME Labs in the Era of COVID-19: Transitioning a Hands-on Integrative Lab Experience to Remote Instruction Using Gamified Lab Simulations.” Biomedical Engineering Education 1 (1): 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43683-020-00015-Y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alptekin, M., and K. Temmen. 2020. “Gamification in an Augmented Reality Based Virtual Preparation Laboratory Training.” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 916: 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_54/TABLES/1.
   Google Scholar
• Alrehaili, E. A., and H. Al Osman. 2019. “A Virtual Reality Role-Playing Serious Game for Experiential Learning.” Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1703008.
   Google Scholar
• Asarbakhsh, M., and J. Sandars. 2013. “E-Learning: The Essential Usability Perspective.” The Clinical Teacher 10 (1): 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00627.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barham, W., J. Preston, and J. Werner. 2012. “Using a Virtual Gaming Environment in Strength of Materials Laboratory.” Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, Proceedings, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412343.0014.
   Google Scholar
• Bedwell, W. L., D. Pavlas, K. Heyne, E. H. Lazzara, and E. Salas. 2012. “Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning: An Empirical Study.” Simulation and Gaming 43 (6): 729–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878112439444.
   Google Scholar
• Bennie, S. J., K. E. Ranaghan, H. Deeks, H. E. Goldsmith, M. B. O’Connor, A. J. Mulholland, and D. R. Glowacki. 2019. “Teaching Enzyme Catalysis Using Interactive Molecular Dynamics in Virtual Reality.” Journal of Chemical Education 96 (11): 2488–2496. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.9B00181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhute, V. J., P. Inguva, U. Shah, and C. Brechtelsbauer. 2021. “Transforming Traditional Teaching Laboratories for Effective Remote Delivery—A Review.” Education for Chemical Engineers 35: 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECE.2021.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. A., B. Villa-Marcos, and D. P. Williams. 2018. “Preparing Students for Practical Sessions Using Laboratory Simulation Software.” Journal of Chemistry Education 96 (1): 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonde, M. T., G. Makransky, J. Wandall, M. V. Larsen, M. Morsing, H. Jarmer, and M. O. A. Sommer. 2014. “Improving Biotech Education Through Gamified Laboratory Simulations.” Nature Biotechnology 32 (7): 694–697. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. H. 2020. “The Design of Applying Gamification in an Immersive Virtual Reality Virtual Laboratory for Powder-Bed Binder Jetting 3DP Training.” Education Sciences 10 (7): 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI10070172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiew, F. H., B. C. Bidaun, and R. T. J. Sipi. 2021. “Assessing Psychomotor Domain in Civil Engineering Design Project During Pandemic.” International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability 6 (2): 77–97. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijsms.v6i2.15573.
   Google Scholar
• Darrah, M., R. Humbert, J. Finstein, M. Simon, and J. Hopkins. 2014. “Are Virtual Labs as Effective as Hands-on Labs for Undergraduate Physics? A Comparative Study at Two Major Universities.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 23 (6): 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10956-014-9513-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doak, D. G., G. S. Denyer, J. A. Gerrard, J. P. Mackay, and J. R. Allison. 2020. “Peppy: A Virtual Reality Environment for Exploring the Principles of Polypeptide Structure.” Protein Science 29 (1): 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/PRO.3752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drace, K. 2013. “Gamification of the Laboratory Experience to Encourage Student Engagement.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education : JMBE 14 (2): 273. https://doi.org/10.1128/JMBE.V14I2.632.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gamage, K. A. A., D. I. Wijesuriya, S. Y. Ekanayake, A. E. W. Rennie, C. G. Lambert, and N. Gunawardhana. 2020. “Online Delivery of Teaching and Laboratory Practices: Continuity of University Programmes During COVID-19 Pandemic.” Education Sciences 10 (10): 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI10100291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalan, M., K. Rosinger, and J. B. Ahn. 2020. “Use of Quasi-Experimental Research Designs in Education Research: Growth, Promise, and Challenges.” Review of Research in Education 44 (1): 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassini, S., K. Laumann, and M. Rasmussen Skogstad. 2020. “The Use of Virtual Reality Alone Does Not Promote Training Performance (but Sense of Presence Does).” Frontiers in Psychology 11), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodotzki, J., T. R. Ortelt, and A. E. Tekkaya. 2018. “Remote and Virtual Labs for Engineering Education 4.0: Achievements of the ELLI Project at the TU Dortmund University.” Procedia Manufacturing 26: 1349–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROMFG.2018.07.126.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Mosquera, L. F., D. Gómez, P. Thomson, L. F. Guerrero-Mosquera, D. Gómez, and P. Thomson. 2018. “Development of a Virtual Earthquake Engineering lab and its Impact on Education.” DYNA 85 (204): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.15446/DYNA.V85N204.66957.
   Google Scholar
• Hatchard, T., F. Azmat, M. Al-Amin, Z. Rihawi, B. Ahmed, and A. Alsebae. 2019. “Examining Student Response to Virtual Reality in Education and Training.” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), 2019-July, 1145–1149. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN41052.2019.8972023.
   Google Scholar
• Hensen, C., and J. Barbera. 2019. “Assessing Affective Differences between a Virtual General Chemistry Experiment and a Similar Hands-On Experiment.” Journal of Chemical Education 96 (10): 2097–2108. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.9B00561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A. 2022, September. “Supporting Student Motivation through Social Comparison.” In Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3292/DCECTEL2022_paper03.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kamińska, D., T. Sapiński, S. Wiak, T. Tikk, R. E. Haamer, E. Avots, A. Helmi, C. Ozcinar, and G. Anbarjafari. 2019. “Virtual Reality and Its Applications in Education: Survey.” Information 10 (10): 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO10100318.
   Google Scholar
• Karakasidis, T. 2013. “Virtual and Remote Labs in Higher Education Distance Learning of Physical and Engineering Sciences.” IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 798–807. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2013.6530198.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E., L. Rothrock, and A. Freivalds. 2016. “The Effects of Gamification on Engineering Lab Activities.” Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2016-November. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757442.
   Google Scholar
• Kollöffel, B., and T. de Jong. 2013. “Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Circuits in Secondary Vocational Engineering Education: Combining Traditional Instruction with Inquiry Learning in a Virtual lab.” Journal of Engineering Education 102 (3): 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krontiris, A. 2021. Virtual Labs – challenges, Opportunities and Practical Lessons Learned. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPS52805.2021.9492610.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., D. Zhang, H. Guo, and J. Shen. 2017. “A Novel Virtual Simulation Teaching System for Numerically Controlled Machining.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 46 (1): 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419017715426.
   Google Scholar
• Lipp, N., R. Sterna, N. Dużmańska-Misiarczyk, A. Strojny, S. Poeschl-Guenther, and P. Strojny. 2021. “VR Realism Scale - Revalidation of Contemporary VR Headsets on a Polish Sample.” PloS ONE 16 (12): e0261507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, G. G., J. P. Voccio, D. E. Perkins, and T. Greene. 2021. Introduction to Engineering Virtual Labs - Challenges and Improvements.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, S., M. Storr, S. Paynter, P. Morgan, and D. Ilic. 2012. “Investigating the Efficacy of Practical Skill Teaching: A Pilot-Study Comparing Three Educational Methods.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 18 (1): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10459-012-9355-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, M. A., M. C. Viegas, M. C. Costa-Lobo, A. V. Fidalgo, G. R. Alves, J. S. Rocha, and I. Gustavsson. 2014. “How Remote Labs Impact on Course Outcomes: Various Practices Using VISIR.” IEEE Transactions on Education 57 (3): 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2284156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee, M., P. Armstrong, and G. Cunningham. 2009. Achieving Effective Learning in Engineering Laboratory Classes. 5th International CDIO Conference, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore. http://cdio.org/files/document/file/D6.1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pàmies Vilà, R., A. Fabregat Sanjuan, J. Puig Ortiz, L. Jordi Nebot, and A. Hernández Fernández. 2022. “Aplication of a Gamification Learning System in Mechanical Engineering Studies.” 50 Th SEFI Annual Conference, 48–57. https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/374374.
   Google Scholar
• Potkonjak, V., M. Gardner, V. Callaghan, P. Mattila, C. Guetl, V. M. Petrović, and K. Jovanović. 2016. “Virtual Laboratories for Education in Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Review.” Computers & Education 95: 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2016.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, E. S., and C. L. Palmer Garden. 2021. “Gamification for Student Engagement: A Framework.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 45 (7): 999–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1875201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnieder, M., S. Williams, and S. Ghosh. 2022. “Comparison of In-Person and Virtual Labs/Tutorials for Engineering Students Using Blended Learning Principles.” Education Sciences 12 (3): 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI12030153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, D., and E. Lester. 2010. “Virtual Chemical Engineering: Guidelines for e-Learning in Engineering Education.” Seminar. net 6 (1), https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2459.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R. S. 2016. “Technology Enabled Learning of Metal Forming Processes for Engineering Graduates Using Virtual Simulation lab.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 44 (2): 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419016640436.
   Google Scholar
• Skulmowski, A., S. Nebel, M. Remmele, and G. D. Rey. 2021. “Is a Preference for Realism Really Naive After all? A Cognitive Model of Learning with Realistic Visualizations.” Educational Psychology Review 34 (2): 649–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09638-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., P. J. Feltovich, P. L. Feltovich, M. J. Jacobson, and R. L. Coulson. 1991. “Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.” Educational Technology 31 (5): 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stuchlikova, L., A. Kosa, P. Benko, and P. Juhasz. 2017. “Virtual Reality vs. Reality in Engineering Education.” ICETA 2017 - 15th IEEE International Conference on Emerging ELearning Technologies and Applications, Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2017.8102533.
   Google Scholar
• Subhash, S., and E. A. Cudney. 2018. “Gamified Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Computers in Human Behavior 87: 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2018.05.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S. W. B., P. K. Naraharisetti, S. K. Chin, and L. Y. Lee. 2020. “Simple Visual-Aided Automated Titration Using the Python Programming Language.” Journal of Chemical Education 97 (3): 850–854. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.9B00802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, S., N. Ali, and S. U. Rahman. 2016a. “The Effect of Procedural Guidance on Students’ Skill Enhancement in a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory.” Journal of Chemical Education 93 (12): 2018–2025. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.5B00969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, S., N. Ali, and S. U. Rahman. 2016b. “The Effect of Procedural Guidance on Students’ Skill Enhancement in a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory.” Journal of Chemical Education 93 (12): 2018–2025. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.5B00969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly, 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara, D., J. Extremera, M. P. Rubio, and L. P. Dávila. 2019. “Meaningful Learning Through Virtual Reality Learning Environments: A Case Study in Materials Engineering.” Applied Sciences 9 (21): 4625. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP9214625.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara, D., P. Fernández-Arias, J. Extremera, L. P. Dávila, and M. P. Rubio. 2021. “Educational Trends Post COVID-19 in Engineering: Virtual Laboratories.” Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.07.494.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vergara, D., M. P. Rubio, and M. Lorenzo. 2016. “New Approach for the Teaching of Concrete Compression Tests in Large Groups of Engineering Students.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 143 (2): 05016009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara, D., M. P. Rubio, and M. Lorenzo. 2017. “On the Design of Virtual Reality Learning Environments in Engineering.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1 (2): 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/MTI1020011.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., P. Mao, H. Li, Y. Xu, D. You, H. Liu, W. Huang, and J. Yuan. 2020. “Assessing the Safety Risks of Civil Engineering Laboratories Based on Lab Criticity Index: A Case Study in Jiangsu Province.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (17): 6244. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH17176244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar