From complex prepositions to complex subordinators: challenging generalizations

References

• Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aarts, Bas. 2011. Oxford Modern English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, Silvia. 2001. “Les locutions prépositives : questions de méthodologie et de définition.” Travaux de linguistique 42–43 (1): 157–170. https://doi.org/10.3917/tl.042.157.
   Google Scholar
• Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea, eds. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Biel, Lucja. 2015. Phraseological Profiles of Legislative Genres: Complex Prepositions as a Special Case of Legal Phrasemes in EU Law and National Law. Fachsprache 37 (3–4). 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Bisang, Walter. 2017. “Grammaticalization.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.103.
   Google Scholar
• Bordet, Lucie, and Denis Jamet. 2010. “Are English Prepositions Lexical or Grammatical Morphemes?” Cercles, Occasional Papers 1–26. http://www.cercles.com/resources/ops/bordetjamet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brems, Lieselotte, and Kristin Davidse. 2010. “Complex Subordinators Derived from Noun Complement Clauses: Grammaticalization and Paradigmaticity.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42 (1): 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2010.486920.
   Google Scholar
• Davidse, Kristin, Lieselotte Brems, and Adam Smith. 2017. “Charting Ongoing Change: The Emergent Complex Subordinators The Moment (That) and For Fear (That).” In Exploring Recent Diachrony: Corpus Studies of Lexicogrammar and Language Practices in Late Modern English, edited by Sebastian Hoffmann, Andrea Sand, and Sabine Arndt-Lappe, 1–25. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/18/davidse_brems_smith/.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 Million Words, 1810-2009. https://corpus.byu.edu/coha/.
   Google Scholar
• Declerck, Renaat, Susan Reed, and Bert Cappelle. 2006. The Grammar of the English Tense System: A Comprehensive Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199888.
   Google Scholar
• De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. “Change Through Recombination: Blending and Analogy.” Language Sciences 40: 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel, Holger, and Martin Hilpert. 2016. “Frequency Effects in Grammar.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.120.
   Google Scholar
• Eastwood, John. (2005) 2009. Oxford Learner’s Grammar: Grammar Finder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagard, Benjamin. 2009. “Prépositions et locutions prépositionnelles : un sémantisme comparable?” Langages 173 (1): 95–113. https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.173.0095.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, Mirjam, and Jan-Ola Östman, eds. 2004. Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, Dylan. 2014. “Correspondence Analysis: Exploring Data and Identifying Patterns.” In Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy, edited by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson, 443–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.43.17gly.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre, Michael. 2007. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its Appliation to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. “Lexicalization and Grammaticization: Opposite or Orthogonal?” In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, edited by Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, and Björn Wiemer, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2005. Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions: A Corpus-Based Study. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On Some Principles of Grammaticization.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, edited by Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, 17–36. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, Rodney D., and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hüning, Matthias. 2014. “Over complexe preposities en convergentie.” In Patroon en argument. Een dubbelfeestbundel bij het emeritaat van William Van Belle en Joop van der Horst, edited by Freek Van de Velde, Hans Smessaert, Frank Van Eynde, and Sara Verbrugge, 433–445. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt14jxsr0.32
   Google Scholar
• Klégr, Aleš. 1997. “English Complex Prepositions of the Prepositional Phrase Type.” Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Philologica 5: 51–78.
   Google Scholar
• Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59.
   Google Scholar
• Noël, Dirk. 2007. “Diachronic Construction Grammar and Grammaticalization Theory.” Functions of Language 14 (2): 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petré, Peter, Kristin Davidse, and Tinne VanRompaey. 2012. “On Ways of Being on the Way: Lexical, Complex Preposition and Aspect Marker Uses.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (2): 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.2.04pet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, Aimo, Rhonwen Bowen, and Joe Trotta. 1994. “On the So-Called Complex Prepositions.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 29: 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. 2013. “Complex Prepositions and Variation within the PNP Construction.” In Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis, edited by Hilde Hasselgård, Jarle Ebeling, and Signe Oksefjell Ebeling, 153–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.57.12smi.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. 2014. “Newly Emerging Subordinators in Spoken/Written English.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 34 (1): 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.875458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timponi Torrent, Tiago. 2015. “On the Relation Between Inheritance and Change: The Constructional Convergence and the Construction Network Reconfiguration Hypotheses.” In Diachronic Construction Grammar, edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea, 173–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.06tor.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2008. “Grammaticalization, Constructions and the Incremental Development of Language: Suggestions from the Development of Degree Modifiers in English.” In Variation, Selection, Development: Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, edited by Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger, and Tonjes Veenstra, 219–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar