A trichotomic view of the linguistic sign: from the distinction between hyponyms and hypernyms to the distinction between images and ideas

References

• Atkinson, Richard C., and Richard M. Shiffrin. 1968. “Human Memory: A Proposed System and Its Control Processes.” In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, edited by Kenneth W. Spence and Janet Taylor Spence, Vol. 2, 89–195. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, Irene, and Michael Herslund. 2005. “Langues endocentriques et langues exocentriques. Approche typologique du danois, du français et de l’anglais.” In Le génie de la langue française. Perspectives typologiques et contrastives, edited by Michael Herslund and Irene Baron [Special edition]. Langue française 145: 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bentsen, Stine E. 2018. “The Comprehension of English Texts by Native Speakers of English and Japanese, Chinese and Russian Speakers of English as a Lingua Franca. An Empirical Study.” PhD diss., Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachteorie. Jena: G. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, Nelson. 2008. “What are the Differences Between Long−Term, Short−Term, and Working Memory?” Progress in Brain Research 169: 323–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudai, Yadin. 2004. “The Neurobiology of Consolidations, Or, How Stable is the Engram?” Annual Review of Psychology 55 (1): 51–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durst-Andersen, Per. 2009. “The Grammar of Linguistic Semiotics. Reading Peirce in a Modern Linguistic Light.” Cybernetics and Human Knowing 16 (3–4): 38–79.
   Google Scholar
• Durst-Andersen, Per. 2011. Linguistic Supertypes. A Cognitive−semiotic Theory of Human Communication. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Durst-Andersen, Per. 2012. “What Languages Tell Us About the Structure of the Human Mind.” Journal of Cognitive Computation 4 (1): 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-011-9109-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durst-Andersen, Per, and Stine E. Bentsen. 2021. “The Word Revisited. Introducing the CogSens Model to Integrate Semiotic, Linguistic and Psychological Perspectives.” Semiotica 238 (238): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0041.
   Google Scholar
• Durst-Andersen, Per, and Paul Cobley. 2018. “The Communicative Wheel: Symptom, Signal and Model in Multimodal Communication.” Semiotica 225 (225): 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0228.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, Christian. 2008. “Visual Object Recognition and Category Specificity.” Doctoral diss., Copenhagen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, Christian. 2009. “Category−specificity in Visual Object Recognition.” Cognition 111 (3): 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herslund, Michael, and Irene Baron. 2003. “Language as World View. Endocentric and Exocentric Representations of Reality.” In Language and Culture [=Copenhagen Studies in Languages 29], edited by Irene Baron, 29–42. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Holdcroft, David. 1991. Saussure: Signs, Systems, and Arbitrariness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Richard. 2012. An Introduction to Word Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, Ray. 1992. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jocelyn, Sheena A. 2010. “Continuing the Search for the Engram: Examining the Mechanism of Fear Memories.” Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 35 (4): 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.100015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, Reasoning. Chicago: Chicago University Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, Phillip N. 1983. Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karl, Lashley. 1950. “In Search of the Engram.” Symposia of Society for Experimental Biology 4: 454–482.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalewski, Hubert. 2015. “Against Arbitrariness. An Alternative Approach Towards Motivation of the Sign.” Public Journal of Semiotics 6 (2): 14–31. https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2015.6.15179.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalewski, Hubert. 2016. Motivating the Symbolic. Towards a Cognitive Theory of the Linguistic Sign. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Krampen, Martin. 1986. “Ontogenesis of Iconicity and the Accessibilty of the Mental Image by Children’s Drawings.” In Semiotics and International Scholarship: Towards a Language of Theory, edited by Jonathan D. Ewans and André Helbo, 85–99. Dordrect: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4464-0_5
   Google Scholar
• Krampen, Martin. 1990. Children’s Drawings. An Iconic Coding of the Environment. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categoires Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, John. 1981. Language and Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinet, André. 1949. “La double articulation linguistique.” Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 5: 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01050206.1949.10416289.
   Google Scholar
• Nida, Eugene A. 1975. Componential Analysis of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Structure. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Nöth, Winfried. 2011. “From Representation to Thirdness and Representamen to Medium: Evolution of Peircean Key Terms and Topics.” Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 47 (4): 415–481. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.47.4.445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Upheavals of Thought. The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, Charles K., and Ivor A. Richards. (1923) 1989. The Meaning of Meaning. Orlando, FL: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Kelly A. 1997. The Continuity of Peirce’s Thoughts. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles S. 1932–1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Edited by Arthur W. Burks, Charles Hartshorne, and Paul Weiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles S. 1953. Charles S. Peirce’s Letters to Lady Welby. Edited by Irwin Lieb. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peyraube, Alain. 2006. “Motion Verbs in Chinese. A Diachronic Study of Directional Complements.” In Space in Languages. Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, edited by Maya Hickmann and Stéphane Robert, 121–135. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.08pey
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, Jean. 1954. The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, Jean, and Bärbel Inhelder. 1966. L’image mentale chez l’enfant. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Poo, Mu-ming, Michele Pignatelli, Tomás J. Ryan, Susumu Tonegawa, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Kelsey C. Martin, Andrii Rudenko, et al. 2016. “What is Memory? The Present State of the Engram.” BMC Biology 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-016-0261-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, Gary H. 1980. “Picture Superiority in Free Recall: The Effects of Organization and Elaboration.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 29 (3): 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(80)90107-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 104 (3): 192–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192.
   Google Scholar
• Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, Martin. 2018. The Semantic Transparency of English Compound Nouns. Berlin: Langscience Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schweppe, Judith, and Ralf Rummer. 2014. “Attention, Working Memory, and Long−term Memory in Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Perspective Based on Process Models of Working Memory.” Educational Psychology Review 26 (2): 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9242-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semon, Richard. 1921. The Mneme. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Sheriff, John K. 1994. Charles Peirce’s Guess at the Riddle. Grounds for Human Significance. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Robert C. 2004. “Emotions, Thoughts, and Feelings: Emotions as Engagements with the World.” In Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, edited by Robert C. Solomon, 76–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics. Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding Cultures Through Their Keywords: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar