FPGA-Based Statechart Controller for MPPT of a Photovoltaic System

References

• T. Esram, and P. L. Chapman, “Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., Vol. 22, pp. 439–49, May 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jyotirmaya, S. Samanta, and S. Bhattacharyya, “Adaptive PID controller with P&O MPPT algorithm for photovoltaic system,” IETE. J. Res., Vol. 66, pp. 442–53, Aug. 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. P. Amit, K. R. Naruttam, and R. P. Hemanshu, “MPPT methods for solar PV systems: A critical review based on tracking nature,” IET Renew. Power Gener., Vol. 13, pp. 1–19, Jul. 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Dimitrijević, M. A. Stošović, and V. B. Litovski, “An MPPT controller model for a standalone PV system,” Int. J. Electron., Vol. 107, pp. 1345–63, Feb. 2020. DOI:10.1080/00207217.2020.1726492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Patel, and V. K. Sood. “Review of digital controllers in power converters,” in IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC), Toronto, 2018, pp. 2381–842.
   Google Scholar
• M. Marios, L. Dimitris, K. Panos, and H. Nikos, “Combined control and power hardware in-the-loop simulation for testing smart grid control algorithms,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 11, pp. 3009–18, Sept. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Harel, “Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems,” Sci. Comput. Program., Vol. 8, pp. 231–74, Jun. 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Culwin, “The statechart design of a novel date input mechanism,” Innov. Teaching Learn. Inf. Comput. Sci., Vol. 3, pp. 1–11, Dec. 2015. DOI:10.11120/ital.2004.03010004.
   Google Scholar
• S. Jinwoo, and G. Anouck, “Recomposable restricted finite state machines: Definition and solution approaches,” Int. J. Control, Vol. 93, pp. 1–21, Jan. 2019. DOI:10.1080/00207179.2019.1566639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Harel, et al., “STATEMATE: A working environment for the development of complex reactive systems,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., Vol. 16, pp. 403–14, Apr. 1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Lee, and P. Hsu, “Statechart-based representation of hybrid controllers for vehicle automation,” IEE Proc. – Intel. Transport Syst., Vol. 153, pp. 253–8, Dec. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• E. C. Shourov, A. Sajid, R. Sabzehgar, and Y. M. Roshan. “A novel implementation of the state flow approach for maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic systems,” in IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems, North Carolina, 2018, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• R. A. Maher, A. K. Abdelsalam, Y. G. Dessouky, and A. Nouman, “High performance state-flow based MPPT technique for micro WECS,” IET Renew. Power Gener., Vol. 13, pp. 3009–21, Dec. 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Ahmed, A. K. Abdelsalam, A. Namaan, Y. G. Dessouky, and N. K. M'Sirdi. “Improved performance state-flow based photovoltaic maximum power point tracking technique,” in 3rd IET Renewable Power Generation Conference, Italy, 2014, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Ali, D. V. Veeraraghavulu, M. Niveditha, N. Priyadharshini, and P. Sandhiya. “Statef-low based incremental conductance MPPT of a P.V. system using Z - source DC - DC converter” in International Conference of PESTSE,. IEEE, Bangalore, India, 2016, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• M. V. P. Lahari, K. R. Sudha, and R. V. Santhi. “Statechart Models of MPPT Controller for a Photo-Voltaic System in Co-Simulation Environment,” in TENCON 2019 IEEE Region 10 Conference, Kerala, 2019, pp. 581–6.
   Google Scholar
• A. Tomar, and S. Mishra, “Synthesis of a new DLMPPT Technique with PLC for enhanced PV energy extraction under varying irradiance and load changing conditions,” IEEE J. Photovoltaics, Vol. 7, pp. 839–48, Mar. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ouberri, H. Yatimi, and E. Aroudam. “Industrial automation PLC-based modeling and diode ideality factor impact on PV characteristics,” International Conference of Computer Science and Renewable Energies (ICCSRE), Morocco, 2019, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Ouberr, H. Yatimi, and E. Aroudam, “Design of a robust sliding mode controller for MPPT based on automation PLC for PV application,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., Vol. 30, Feb. 2020. DOI:10.1002/2050-7038.12296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. E. Zakzouk, M. A. Elsaharty, A. K. Abdelsalam, A. A. Helal, and B. W. Williams, “Improved performance low-cost incremental conductance PV MPPT technique,” IET Renew. Power Gener., Vol. 10, pp. 561–74, Mar. 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. R. Peng, K. C. Ho, and Y. H. Liu, “A novel and fast MPPT method suitable for both fast changing and partially shaded conditions,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 65, pp. 3240–51, Apr. 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. T. Cotfas, P. A. Cotfas, and S. Kaplanis, “Methods to determine the dc parameters of solar cells: A critical review,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., Vol. 28, pp. 588–96, Dec. 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Mahmood. New models for photovoltaic cells in Multisim. National Instruments, 2014, March. Available: https://forums.ni.com/t5/National-Instruments-Circuit/New-Models-for-Photovoltaic-Cells-in-Multisim/ba-p/3473652?profile.language=en.
   Google Scholar
• BP Solar Global Marketing. BP MSX 120, n.d. Available: http://www.soltec-solar.com/html/cms/bp/product_msx_120.pdf.
   Google Scholar