Moral identity, identification and emotion: a relational and interactive approach

References

• Aboulafia, M. (1999). A (Neo) American in Paris: Bourdieu, mead, and pragmatism. In R. Shusterman (Ed.), Bourdieu: A critical reader (pp. 153–174). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Author and hero in aesthetic activity. In M. Holquist, & V. Liapunov (Eds.), Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. 4–256). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution and epistemology. Paladin.
   Google Scholar
• Bazzani, G. (2022). Agency as conversion process. Theory and Society, 52, 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09487-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1992). The logic of practice. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (1991). Morality, identity, and historical explanation: Charles Taylor on the sources of the self. Sociological Theory, 9(2), 232–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/202087
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, C. H. (1983). Human nature and the social order. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D., Navarro-Rivera, J., & Jones, R. P. (2014). A shifting landscape: A decade of change in American attitudes about same-Sex marriage and LGBT issues. Public Religion Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2006). Reflexive embodiment in contemporary society. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, F. (2015). Relational sociology, pragmatism, transactions and social fields. International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The ethical implications of the five-stage skill-acquisition model. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604265023
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Maynard, D. W. (2010). Pragmatism and ethnomethodology. Qualitative Sociology, 34(1), 221–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-010-9183-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1990). Filial obligations and Kin support for elderly people. Ageing & Society, 10(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X00008059
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, O. J. (1990). Identity and strong and weak evaluation. In O. J. Flanagan, & A. O. Rorty (Eds.), Identity, character, and morality: Essays in moral psychology (pp. 37–66). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. (2005). G.H. Mead: Theorist of the social Act. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8308.2005.00262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. (2006). Games and the development of perspective taking. Human Development, 49(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. (2012). Position exchange: The social development of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1995). Individuation through socialization: On George Herbert Mead’s theory of subjectivity. In Postmetaphysical thinking: Philosophical essays (pp. 149–205). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2013). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, S. K., & Hitlin, S. (2014). Morality and emotions. In J. E. Stets, & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions: Volume II (pp. 451–471). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hart-Brinson, P. (2018). The Gay marriage generation: How the LGBTQ movement transformed American culture. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitlin, S. (2003). Values as the core of personal identity: Drawing links between Two theories of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Introduction to membership categorisation analysis. In R. Fitzgerald & W. Housley (Eds.), Advances in membership categorisation analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatow, G. (2009). Why the sociology of morality needs Bourdieu’s habitus. Sociological Inquiry, 79(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2014). Social identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, H. (1990). The creativity of action and the intersubjectivity of reason: Mead’s pragmatism and social theory. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 26(2), 165–194. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40320279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, H. (1997). G.H. Mead: A contemporary Re-examination of His thought. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, W. (2010). Minds, surfaces, and reasons in the anthropology of ethics. In M. Lambek (Ed.), Ordinary ethics: Anthropology, language, and action (pp. 64–83). Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, W. (2015). Ethical life: Its natural and social histories. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keleher, A., & Smith, E. N. (2012). Growing support for Gay and lesbian equality since 1990. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(9), 1307–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.720540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFollette, H., & Woodruff, M. L. (2015). The righteous mind: Why good people Are divided by politics and religion: The limits of haidt: How his explanation of political animosity fails. Philosophical Psychology, 28(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.838752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontyev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, J. (2001). America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review, 66(5), 762–782. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1994). Critical remarks on The sources of the self by Charles Taylor. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54(1), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108366
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martel, F. (2018). Global Gay: How Gay culture Is changing the world. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, L. (2003). Having it both ways: The incompatibility of narrative identity and communicative ethics in feminist thought. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403206001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1913). The social self. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 10(14), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2012910
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1925). The genesis of the self and social control. International Journal of Ethics, 35(3), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1086/intejethi.35.3.2377274
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From The standpoint of a social behaviorist (C. Morris, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1981). Selected writings. Edited by A.J. Reck. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michelson, M. R. (2019). The power of visibility: Advances in LGBT rights in the United States and Europe. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1086/700591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, A. (2015). The (Re)genesis of values: Examining the importance of values for action’. American Sociological Review, 80(4), 680–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415591800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, A., & Upenieks, L. (2018). An expanded model of the moral self: Beyond care and justice. Social Science Research, 72, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, C., & Dépelteau, F. (2013). Introduction. In C. Powell, & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 1–12). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, A. O., & Wong, D. (1990). Aspects of identity and agency. In O. J. Flanagan, & A. O. Rorty (Eds.), Identity, character, and morality: Essays in moral psychology (pp. 19–35). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, G. M., & Bohan, J. S. (2016). Institutional allyship for LGBT equality: Underlying processes and potentials for change. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sève, L. (2008). in press). Thinking With marx today, volume 2: “Man?” (trans. J. H. Membrez). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. J. (1986). Charles Taylor’s moral subject. Political Theory, 14(2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591786014002008
   Google Scholar
• Silva, F. C. d. (2013). Outline of a social theory of rights: A neo-pragmatist approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 16(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013484001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1999). Family fragments? Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. H. (2002). Charles Taylor: Meaning, morals and modernity. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2003). Moral, believing animals: Human personhood and culture. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2011). The moral self: Applying identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(2), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272511407621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411433762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Benjamin Cummings.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophical papers: Human agency and language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1995). The dialogical self. In R. F. Goodman, & W. R. Fisher (Eds.), Rethinking knowledge: Reflections across the disciplines (pp. 57–66). SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar