Exploring critical media literacy with culturally and linguistically diverse youth in Australia: recontextualisation of school learning in home environments

References

• ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2022. “Cultural Diversity of Australia.” https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/cultural-diversity-australia#language.
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority) 2023. https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/learning-areas/english/year-10?view=quick&detailed-content-descriptions=0&hide-ccp=0&hide-gc=0&side-by-side=1&strands-start-index=0&subjects-start-index=0.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2014. ““Well, Hang On, They’re Actually Much Better Than that!”: Disrupting Dominant Discourses of Deficit About English Language Learners in Senior High School English.” English Teaching: Practice & Critique 13 (3): 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2021. Critical Literacy with Adolescent English Language Learners: Exploring Policy and Practice in Global Contexts. Routledge Research in Language Education series. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D., and C. Harrison. 2017. “Social Media Texts and Critical Inquiry in a Post-Factual Era.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 61 (3): 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E., J. D. Marshall, C. A. McLean, A. P. Huddleston, J. Joaquin, and J. Bishop. 2012. “Adolescents’ Web-Based Literacies, Identity Construction, and Skill Development.” Literacy Research and Instruction 51 (3): 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2010.523135.
   Google Scholar
• Ascenzi-Moreno, L., and K. Seltzer. 2021. “Always at the Bottom: Ideologies in Assessment of Emergent Bilinguals.” Journal of Literacy Research 53 (4): 468–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211052255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila, J., and J. Z. Pandya. 2012. Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis: Intersections and Challenges (New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bacalja, A., E. Aguilera, and E. F. Castrillon-Angel. 2022. “Critical Digital Literacy.” In The Handbook of Critical Literacies, edited by J. Z. Pandya, R. Mora, J. H. Alford, N. Golden, and R. de Roock, 373–380. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. 2021. “Wag the Dog: A Digital Literacies Narrative.” Literacy Research: Theory, Method, & Practice 70 (1): 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377211027556.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., and C. A. Chinn. 2020. “A Review of Educational Responses to the “Post-truth” Condition: Four Lenses on “Post-truth” Problems.” Educational Psychologist 55 (3): 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1990. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., S. Barzilai, and R. G. Duncan. 2021. “Education for a “Post-Truth” World: New Directions for Research and Practice.” Educational Researcher 50 (1): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20940683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber, B., H. Grant, H. Janks, and G. G. Hruby. 2018. “Working Critically and Creatively with Fake News.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 62 (3): 329–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton-Lilly, C., A. Mitra, M. Guay, and L. Spence. 2020. “A Confluence of Complexity: Intersections Among Reading Theory, Neuroscience and Observations of Young Readers.” Reading Research Quarterly 55 (S1): S185–S195. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.348.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. 2014. The Importance of Critical Literacy, Eds. J. Zacher Pandya & J. Ávila., 32–44. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jerasa, S., and T. Boffone 2021. “BookTok 101: TikTok, Digital Literacies and Out-Of-School Reading Practices.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 65 (3): 219–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, F. V., and L. Unsworth. 2023. “Multimodal Composing in the English Classroom: Recontextualising the Curriculum to Learning.” English in Education 57 (2): 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2023.2187696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. 2019. “Theories of Trans/Languaging and Trans/Semiotising: Implications for Content-Based Education Classrooms.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22 (1): 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A., and K. Dooley 2011. “Critical literacy and second language learning.” In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, edited by E. Hinkel, 856–868. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S., N. K. Duke, D. Bloome, S. Faust, I. M. García-Sánchez, A. Stornaiuolo, and D. Alvermann. 2020. “How Can We Study Children’s/Youth’s Out of School Experiences to Inform Classroom Practices?” Literacy Research: Theory, Method, & Practice 69 (1): 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336920937261.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, T., A. Goodstein-Stolzenberg, and E. C. Saliani. 2007. ““Indnpride”: Online Spaces of Transnational Youth as Sites of Creative and Sophisticated Literacy and Identity Work.” Linguistics and Education 18 (3–4): 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., M. Overby, N. Tysvaer, and K. Morris. 2008. “The Complex World of Adolescent Literacy: Myths, Motivations, and Mysteries.” Harvard Educational Review 78 (1): 107–154. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.54468j6204x24157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M., D. Zancanella, and J. Ávila. 2014. “Text Complexity: The Battle for Critical Literacy in the Common Core State Standards.” In Moving Critical Literacies Forward: A New Look at Praxis Across Contexts, edited by J. Z. Pandya and J. Ávila, 129–145. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, E. 2002. “Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Popular Culture: Literacy Development Among Urban Youth.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 46 (1): 72–77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40017507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notely, T., M. Dezuanni, H. F. Zhong, and S. Howden 2017. “News and Australia’s Children: How Young People Access, Perceive and are Affected by the News.” Crinkling News, Western Sydney University and Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L. 2019. Young People’s Literacies in the Digital Age: Continuities, Conflicts, and Contradictions. Abingdon, Eng: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patti, C., and C. Ellis. 2017. “Co-Constructed Interviewing.” In The International Encyclopaedia of Communication Research Methods, edited by J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, and R. F. Potter, 1–2. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. 2009. Case Study Research in Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Skerrett, A., and R. Bomer. 2011. “Borderzones in Adolescents’ Literacy Practices: Connecting Out-Of-School Literacies to the Reading Curriculum.” Urban Education 46 (6): 1256–1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911398920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. A. 2014. “Social Networking, Workplace, and Entertainment Literacies: The Out-Of-School Literate Lives of Newcomer Adolescent Immigrants.” Literacy Research and Instruction 53 (4): 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2014.931495.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 2018. “Fighting “fake news” in an age of digital disorientation: Towards “real news”, critical media literacy education, and independent journalism for 21st century citizens.” In Critical media literacy and fake news in post-truth America, edited by C. Z. Goering and P. L. Thomas, 53–65. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., S. McGrew, J. Breakstone, and T. Ortega. 2016. Evaluating Information: The Cornerstone of Civic Online Reasoning. Stanford, USA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar