Beyond ‘periphery’: a detailed and nuanced taxonomy of the Norwegian regions

References

• Albrecht, M., I. Grundel, and D. Morales. 2021. “Regional Bioeconomies: Public Finance and Sustainable Policy Narratives.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 103 (2): 116–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T. 1999. “Interactive Learning and Localised Knowledge in Globalising Learning Economies.” Geo Journal 49: 345–352.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., and L. Coenen. 2005. “Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters.” Research Policy 34: 1173–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., and M. S. Gertler. 2005. “The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery, and Richard R. Nelson, 291–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., and A. Isaksen. 2002. “Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky' and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 27: 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., A. Isaksen, and M. Trippl. 2019. An Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Azaryahu, M. 2008. “Tel Aviv: Center, Periphery and the Cultural Geographies of an Aspiring Metropolis.” Social & Cultural Geography 9: 303–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg-Nilssen, I., T. Nilsen, S. Karstad, A. Hervik, E. Angell, and B. Bergem. 2012. Erfaringsstudie om ringvirkninger fra petroleumsvirksomhet for næringsliv og samfunn for øvrig. Kunnskapsinnhenting for det nordøstlige Norskehavet. Utarbeidet på oppdrag fra Olje- og energidepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., and B. Truffer. 2017. “Global Innovation Systems—A Conceptual Framework for Innovation Dynamics in Transnational Contexts.” Research Policy 46 (7): 1284–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39: 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and S. Iammarino. 2009. “Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy.” Economic Geography 85: 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullvåg, E., S. Ovesen, T. Steffensen, C. E. Nyvold, and E. Slørdal Skjemstad. 2018. En rapport om utviklingen gjennom 2017 og utsiktene for 2018. Indeks Nordland.
   Google Scholar
• Calignano, G. 2022. “Not All Peripheries are the Same: The Importance of Relative Regional Innovativeness in Transnational Innovation Networks.” Growth and Change 53: 276–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calignano, G., and T. I. Vaaland. 2018. “Local Content in Tanzania: Are Local Suppliers Motivated to Improve?” The Extractive Industries and Society 5: 104–113.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, D. A., D. B. Carson, and L. Lundström. 2021. “Northern Cities and Urban–Rural Migration of University-Qualified Labour in Australia and Sweden: Spillovers, Sponges, or Disconnected City–Hinterland Geographies?” Geographical Research 59: 424–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells-Quintana, D., V. Royuela, and P. Veneri. 2020. “Inequality and City Size: An Analysis for OECD Functional Urban Areas.” Papers in Regional Science 99 (4): 1045–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccone, A., and R. E. Hall. 1996. “Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity.” The American Economic Review 86 (1): 54–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., J. Moodysson, and H. Martin. 2015. “Path Renewal in Old Industrial Regions: Possibilities and Limitations for Regional Innovation Policy.” Regional Studies 49: 850–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, J., W. Ellingsen, and K. Hidle. 2013. “A Crisis of Definition: Culture Versus Industry in Odda, Norway.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 95: 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan J., T. Broekel, and R. D. Fitjar. 2021. “Searching through the Haystack: The Relatedness and Complexity of Priorities in Smart Specialization Strategies.” Economic Geography 97 (5): 497–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Siena, L., and G. Calignano. 2019. “Agglomeration Economies in the Italian ICT Sector: The Structural Features.” Rivista Geografica Italiana 126 (4): 162–192.
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. 2004. “Regional Innovation Systems in Canada: A Comparative Study.” Regional Studies 38: 479–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., and S. Dionne. 2008. “Is Regional Innovation System Development Possible in Peripheral Regions? Some Evidence from the Case of La Pocatière, Canada.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 20: 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., and I. Porto Gomez. 2017. “A Review of (Almost) 20 Years of Regional Innovation Systems Research.” European Planning Studies 25: 371–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. 2015. “Business Networks and the Competitiveness of Small Manufacturing Firms in Sweden`s Northern Periphery.” Norwegian Journal of Geography 69 (3): 135–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, J. 2019. “Innovation in the Periphery: A Critical Survey and Research Agenda.” International Regional Science Review 42: 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, J. 2019. “Peripheralization and Knowledge Bases in Austria: Towards a New Regional Typology.” European Planning Studies 27: 42–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, J., and M. Trippl. 2019. “Innovation in the Periphery: Compensation and Exploitation Strategies.” Growth and Change 50: 1511–1531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdemo, T., and D. Örtqvist. 2021. “Exploring a Leading and Lagging Regions Dichotomy: Does Entrepreneurship and Diversity Explain it?” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 10: 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. 2020. ESPON FUORE – ESPON FUORE - Functional Urban Areas and Regions in Europe. Monitoring and Tools. Final Report. Version 10/07/2020. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/Functional%20Urban%20Areas%20and%20Regions%20in%20Europe%20-%20Final%20Report.pdf (accessed on 17 February 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat, Production in Industry. 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/EN/sts_ind_prod_esms_no.htm (accessed 30 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Faggian, A., R. Gemmiti, T. Jaquet, and I. Santini. 2018. “Regional Economic Resilience: The Experience of the Italian Local Labor Systems.” The Annals of Regional Science 60: 393–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggian, A., F. Modrego, and P. McCann. 2019. “Human Capital and Regional Development.” In Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories, edited by Roberta Capello, and Peter Nijkamp, 149–171. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., and D. Kogler. 2010. “Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B. Hall, and N. Rosenberg, 1, 381–410. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., P. Adler, and C. Mellander. 2017. “The City as Innovation Machine.” Regional Studies 51: 86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangenheim, A., M. Trippl, and C. Chlebna. 2020. “Beyond the Single Path View: Interpath Dynamics in Regional Contexts.” Economic Geography 96 (1): 31–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and M. Wyrwich. 2021. “Is Innovation (Increasingly) Concentrated in Large Cities? An International Comparison.” Research Policy 50: 104237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjelsvik, M. 2011. “The Dynamics of the Regional Innovation around the Oil and Gas Industries: Cases of Stavanger and Aberdeen.” Revista de Ingeniería 34: 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Glückler, J., R. Shearmur, and K. Martinus. 2022. “Liability or Opportunity? Reconceptualizing the Periphery and Its Role in Innovation.” Journal of Economic Geography. https://academic.oup.com/joeg/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jeg/lbac028/6761311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 1993. The Embedded Firm: On the Socio-Economics of Industrial Networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 2018. “Marginality as Strategy: Leveraging Peripherality for Creativity.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (8): 1785–1794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., B. Asheim, A. Isaksen, and H. Nielsen. 2022. “Advancing the Treatment of Human Agency in the Analysis of Regional Economic Development: Illustrated with Three Norwegian Cases.” Growth and Change 53 (1): 248–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., M. Martynovich, R. D. Fitjar, and S. Haus-Reve. 2021. “The Black Box of Regional Growth.” Journal of Geographical Systems 23: 425–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and M. Nilsson. 2015. “Innovation in Peripheral Regions: Do Collaborations Compensate for a Lack of Local Knowledge Spillovers?” The Annals of Regional Science 54: 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and M. Sotarauta. 2020. “Trinity of Change Agency, Regional Development Paths and Opportunity Spaces.” Progress in Human Geography 44: 704–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1999. “The Future of Cities.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 23: 173–185.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. M., D. Harrison, D. Weaver, and G. Wall. 2013. “Vanishing Peripheries: Does Tourism Consume Places?” Tourism Recreation Research 38: 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Herstad, S. J., H. Wiig Aslesen, and B. Ebersberger. 2014. “On Industrial Knowledge Bases, Commercial Opportunities and Global Innovation Network Linkages.” Research Policy 43 (3): 495–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., S.-E. Jakobsen, E. Njøs, and R. Normann. 2019. “Regional Industrial Restructuring Resulting from Individual and System Agency.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32: 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and J. Karlsen. 2013. “Can Small Regions Construct Regional Advantages? The Case of Four Norwegian Regions.” European Urban and Regional Studies 20 (2): 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and J. Karlsen. 2010. “Different Modes of Innovation and the Challenge of Connecting Universities and Industry: Case Studies of Two Regional Industries in Norway.” European Planning Studies 18 (12): 1993–2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., F. Tödtling and, and M. Trippl. 2018. “Innovation Policies for Regional Structural Change: Combining Actor-Based and System-Based Strategies.” In New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lesson, edited by Arne Isaksen, Roman Martin, and Michaela Trippl, 221–238. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and M. Trippl. 2016. “Regional Industrial Path Development in Different Types of Regions: A Conceptual Analysis.” In Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategy, edited by Davide Parrilli, Rune Dahl Fitjar, and Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 66–84. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and M. Trippl. 2017. “Exogenously Led and Policy-Supported New Path Development in Peripheral Regions: Analytical and Synthetic Routes.” Economic Geography 93: 436–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstad, T., and A. Hauge. 2009. Samhandling og innovasjon. Aktører, systemer og initiativ i Innlandet. Vallset: Oplandske Bokforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. 2002. “Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production.” Research Policy 31: 247–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. 2005. “Sectoral Systems of Innovation: A Framework for Linking Innovation to the Knowledge Base, Structure and Dynamics of Sectors.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14 (1–2): 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M., and J. Moodysson. 2013. “Comparing Knowledge Bases: On the Geography and Organization of Knowledge Sourcing in the Regional Innovation System of Scania, Sweden.” European Urban and Regional Studies 20 (2): 170–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2006. “Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution.” Journal of Economic Geography 6: 395–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellander, C., and R. Florida. 2014. “The Rise of Skills: Human Capital, the Creative Class, and Regional Development.” In Handbook of Regional Science, edited by Manfred M. Fisher, and Peter Nijkamp, 317–329. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., M. Henning, and R. Boschma. 2011. “How Do Regions Diversify Over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions.” Economic Geography 87: 237–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge (United States): The Belknapp Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T. 2017. “Firm-Driven Path Creation in Arctic Peripheries.” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 32: 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., M. Grillitsch, and A. Hauge. 2022. “Varieties of Periphery and Local Agency in Regional Development.” Regional Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00343404.2022.2106364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., and S. Karlstad. 2016. “Connecting to Global Production Networks: Challenges for Regional Actors in Northern Norway.” Arctic Review on Law and Politics 7: 42–59.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., and R. Njøs. 2022. “Greening of Regional Industrial Paths and the Role of Sectoral Characteristics: A Study of the Maritime and Petroleum Sectors in an Arctic Region.” European Urban and Regional Studies 29 (2): 204–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., S. Sjøtun, and S.-E. Jakobsen. 2020. “Expanding Analyses of Path Creation: Interconnections Between Territory and Technology.” Economic Geography 96 (3): 266–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NORDREGIO. 2016. Functional urban areas 2016. https://nordregio.org/maps/functional-urban-areas-2016/ (accessed on 17 Feburary 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Paci, R., and S. Usai. 2008. “Agglomeration Economies, Spatial Dependence and Local Industry Growth.” Revue D'économie Industrielle 123: 87–109.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzi, G., and G. Urso. 2017. “Coping with Peripherality: Local Resilience Between Policies and Practices. Editorial Note.” Italian Journal of Planning Practice 7: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, R., and A. Dubois. 2021. “Peripheries Within Economic Geography: Four “Problems” and the Road Ahead of Us.” Journal of Rural Studies 87: 267–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., and R. Crescenzi. 2008. “Mountains in a Flat World: Why Proximity Still Matters for the Location of Economic Activity.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1 (3): 371–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel, T., C. Pfister, and U. Backes-Gellner. 2022. “Tertiary Ducation Expansion and Regional Firm Development.” Regional Studies 56 (11): 1874–1887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P. G., J. M. Díaz-Puente, and M. Bettoni. 2022. “How Rurality Influences Interactive Innovation Processes: Lessons Learnt from 15 Case Studies in 12 Countries.” European Planning Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09654313.2022.2043832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze-Krogh, A. C., and G. Calignano. 2020. “How do Firms Perceive Interactions with Researchers in Small Innovation Projects? Advantages and Barriers for Satisfactory Collaborations.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 11: 908–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2012. “Are Cities the Font of Innovation? A Critical Review of the Literature on Cities and Innovation.” Cities 29: S9–S18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., and D. Doloreux. 2016. “How Open Innovation Processes Vary Between Urban and Remote Environments: Slow Innovators, Market-Sourced Information and Frequency of Interaction.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 28: 337–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., and D. Doloreux. 2021. “The Geography of Knowledge Revisited: Geographies of KIBS use by a new Rural Industry.” Regional Studies 55: 495–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2021a. Classification of centrality. https://www.ssb.no/en/klass/klassifikasjoner/128/koder (accessed 30 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2021b. Classification of Economic Regions. Available online: https://www.ssb.no/a/english/publikasjoner/pdf/nos_c634_en/nos_c634_en.pdf (accessed on 30 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl. 2005. “One Size Fits all?” Research Policy 34 (8): 1203–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., S. Baumgartinger-Seiringer, A. Frangenheim, A. Isaksen, and J. O. Ryptestøl. 2020. “Unravelling Green Regional Industrial Path Development: Regional Preconditions, Asset Modification and Agency.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 111: 189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. 2016. “Tracing Policy Movements: Methods for Studying Learning and Policy Circulation.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (2): 391–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar