Informational analysis of the Canadian National Hydrometric program monitoring network

References

• Alfonso, Leonardo, Arnold Lobbrecht, and Roland Price. 2010. “Information Theory–Based Approach for Location of Monitoring Water Level Gauges in Polders.” Water Resources Research 46 (3): W03528. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008101
   Google Scholar
• Altman, N. S. 1992. “An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression.” The American Statistician 46 (3): 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 2022. “Terrestrial Ecoregions: Level I - Commission for Environmental Cooperation.” Accessed July 20, 2022. http://www.cec.org/north-american-environmental-atlas/terrestrial-ecoregions-level-i/.
   Google Scholar
• Coulibaly, Paulin, Jos Samuel, Alain Pietroniro, and David Harvey. 2013. “Evaluation of Canadian National Hydrometric Network Density Based on WMO 2008 Standards.” Canadian Water Resources Journal 38 (2): 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2013.787181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doane, David P. 1976. “Aesthetic Frequency Classifications.” The American Statistician 30 (4): 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1976.10479172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, Mark J., and Sean W. Fleming. 2015. “Complex Network Theory, Streamflow, and Hydrometric Monitoring System Design.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 19 (7): 3301–3318. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, Hongjun, Hung Soo Kim, Soojun Kim, and Bellie Sivakumar. 2021. “Complex Networks and Integrated Centrality Measure to Assess the Importance of Streamflow Stations in a River Basin.” Journal of Hydrology 598: 126280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karn, Jeffrey. 2020. “Assessing the Spatial Gradient of Hydrometric Monitoring Needs in Canada.” Environment and Climate Change Canada (Unpublished Internal Company Document)
   Google Scholar
• Keum, Jongho, and Paulin Coulibaly. 2017a. “Information Theory-Based Decision Support System for Integrated Design of Multivariable Hydrometric Networks.” Water Resources Research 53 (7): 6239–6259. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keum, Jongho, and Paulin Coulibaly. 2017b. “Sensitivity of Entropy Method to Time Series Length in Hydrometric Network Design.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 22 (7): 04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keum, Jongho, Paulin Coulibaly, Tara Razavi, Dominique Tapsoba, Adam Gobena, Frank Weber, and Alain Pietroniro. 2018. “Application of SNODAS and Hydrologic Models to Enhance Entropy-Based Snow Monitoring Network Design.” Journal of Hydrology 561: 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keum, Jongho, Frezer Seid Awol, Jacob Ursulak, and Paulin Coulibaly. 2019. “Introducing the Ensemble-Based Dual Entropy and Multiobjective Optimization for Hydrometric Network Design Problems: EnDEMO.” Entropy 21 (10): 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21100947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keum, Jongho, Kurt C. Kornelsen, James M. Leach, and Paulin Coulibaly. 2017. “Entropy Applications to Water Monitoring Network Design: A Review.” Entropy 19 (11): 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19110613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmet, Dale R. 2021. Service beyond Measure: The Story of Water Survey of Canada. Canadian Water Resources Association. https://cwra.org/en/contact-us/.
   Google Scholar
• Kornelsen, Kurt C., and Paulin Coulibaly. 2015. “Design of an Optimal Soil Moisture Monitoring Network Using SMOS Retrieved Soil Moisture.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 53 (7): 3950–3959. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2388451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Max, and Kjell Johnson. 2013. Applied Predictive Modeling. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3
   Google Scholar
• Leach, James M., Kurt C. Kornelsen, Jos Samuel, and Paulin Coulibaly. 2015. “Hydrometric Network Design Using Streamflow Signatures and Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration.” Journal of Hydrology 529: 1350–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, James M., Paulin Coulibaly, and Yiping Guo. 2016. “Entropy Based Groundwater Monitoring Network Design considering Spatial Distribution of Annual Recharge.” Advances in Water Resources 96: 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Chao, Vijay P. Singh, and Ashok K. Mishra. 2012. “Entropy Theory-Based Criterion for Hydrometric Network Evaluation and Design: Maximum Information Minimum Redundancy.” Water Resources Research 48 (5): W05521. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011251
   Google Scholar
• Markus, Momcilo, H. Vernon Knapp, and Gary D. Tasker. 2003. “Entropy and Generalized Least Square Methods in Assessment of the Regional Value of Streamgages.” Journal of Hydrology 283 (1–4): 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00244-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, Ashok, and K. Paulin Coulibaly. 2010. “Hydrometric Network Evaluation for Canadian Watersheds.” Journal of Hydrology 380 (3–4): 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, Ashok K., and Paulin Coulibaly. 2014. “Variability in Canadian Seasonal Streamflow Information and Its Implication for Hydrometric Network Design.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 19 (8): 05014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Auditor General of Canada (OAGC). 2010. “Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development to the House of Commons. Chapter 2: Monitoring Water Resources.” https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2011/bvg-oag/FA1-2-2010-2-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ouarda, Taha B. M. J., Claude Girard, George S. Cavadias, and Bernard Bobée. 2001. “Regional Flood Frequency Estimation with Canonical Correlation Analysis.” Journal of Hydrology 254 (1–4): 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00488-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, Jos, Paulin Coulibaly, and Joshua Kollat. 2013. “CRDEMO: Combined Regionalization and Dual Entropy-Multiobjective Optimization for Hydrometric Network Design.” Water Resources Research 49 (12): 8070–8089. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, Claude E. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal 27 (3): 379–423. 623-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, Donald. 1968. “A Two-Dimensional Interpolation Function for Irregularly-Spaced Data.” Proceedings of 1968 23rd ACM National Conference, 517–524. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/800186.810616
   Google Scholar
• Shu, Chang, and Taha B. M. J. Ouarda. 2012. “Improved Methods for Daily Streamflow Estimates at Ungauged Sites.” Water Resources Research 48 (2): W02523. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011501
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Vijay P. 1997. “The Use of Entropy in Hydrology and Water Resources.” Hydrological Processes 11 (6): 587–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199705)11:6<587::AID-HYP479>3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreeparvathy, Vijay, and V. V. Srinivas. 2020. “A Fuzzy Entropy Approach for Design of Hydrometric Monitoring Networks.” Journal of Hydrology 586: 124797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. 2017. “Standard Drainage Area Classification (SDAC).” Accessed August 16, 2022. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjects/standard/sdac/sdacinfo1.
   Google Scholar
• Tongal, Hakan, and Bellie Sivakumar. 2022. “Transfer Entropy Coupled Directed–Weighted Complex Network Analysis of Rainfall Dynamics.” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 36 (3): 851–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02091-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursulak, Jacob, and Paulin Coulibaly. 2021. “Integration of Hydrological Models with Entropy and Multi-Objective Optimization Based Methods for Designing Specific Needs Streamflow Monitoring Networks.” Journal of Hydrology 593: 125876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werstuck, Connor, and Paulin Coulibaly. 2018. “Assessing Spatial Scale Effects on Hydrometric Network Design Using Entropy and Multi-Objective Methods.” JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 54 (1): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werstuck, Connor, and Paulin Coulibaly. 2017. “Hydrometric Network Design Using Dual Entropy Multi-Objective Optimization in the Ottawa River Basin.” Hydrology Research 48 (6): 1639–1651. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijaya, Dedy R., Riyanarto Sarno, and Enny Zulaika. 2017. “Information Quality Ratio as a Novel Metric for Mother Wavelet Selection.” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 160: 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2008. “Methods of Observation.” In Hydrology – From Measurement to Hydrological Information, I.2-1 - I.2-60. 6th ed. Vol. I of Guide to Hydrological Practices. Geneva, Switzerland: WMO-No. 168.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Yujuin, and Donald H. Burn. 1994. “An Entropy Approach to Data Collection Network Design.” Journal of Hydrology 157 (1–4): 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90111-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar